User talk:Faizan

User	Talk	E-mail	My part	Toolbox	Bookmarks	Guestbook

Criteria

hi Faizan. The wikipedia policy WP:VERIFY state that the criteria for inclusion is that material "must clearly support the material as presented in the article". Please bear that in mind in your future edits. References must also be "reliable, third-party, published sources" per wp:rs. The source you used isn't. Thank you. Pass a Method talk 19:01, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

Vandalism

If i do vandalize wikipedia, for how long will i be banned? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.253.97.50 (talk) 12:15, 15 June 2013 (UTC)

At the pace at which you are vandalizing, you may get an indefinite block. Please stop it. Faizan 12:19, 15 June 2013 (UTC)

ok i wont do it now :( — Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.253.97.50 (talk) 12:22, 15 June 2013 (UTC)

That's great. I was going to report you otherwise. Faizan 12:24, 15 June 2013 (UTC)

Syed Ahmed Bukhari

What is written in this ? Solomon7968 13:55, 15 June 2013 (UTC)

It is the board at the mosque I think, which includes the names of all the thirteen Imams on the mosque, just like included in the list in Shahi Imam. Faizan 13:57, 15 June 2013 (UTC)

I cannot visualise this. There are only 13 imams till today, all in a family since the time of Shahjahan. Should we not have separate articles for each of them? And what is the Pakistani equivalent of Jama Masjid. I mean the most historically significant mosque in Pakistan. I know about the lahore mosque but is it the most influential? Solomon7968 14:15, 15 June 2013 (UTC)

We can have separate articles for them, but if we have the substance which we found for Syed Ahmed Bukhari. Jama Masjid is the same for all over the world. Its meaning is like "A Grand Mosque". In Pakistan, we have them at Khudabad and Sialkot. But the Badshahi mosque is obviously more influential and known. Faizan 14:21, 15 June 2013 (UTC)

I checked the article Badshahi Mosque. It does not contains the list of its Imams. Any info? Solomon7968 15:12, 15 June 2013 (UTC)

What I could find from the external links was: [1] and [2]. Faizan 15:16, 15 June 2013 (UTC)

Article in Urdu Wikipedia created too. Faizan 09:37, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

Surrender

hi faizan, we had our first arguments over the instrument of surrender article, remember? Why can't you people accept the reality of '71 and move on? You should keep the redirect, its a very common term--ArmanJ (talk) 13:58, 15 June 2013 (UTC)

Hello Arman. My concerns on the redirect remain there. It is insignificant, redundant, and therefore unnecessary. It does not tell about the time period of the surrender, and is less likely to be used for a redirect commonly. Faizan 14:01, 15 June 2013 (UTC)

It's a very significant term because its more commonly used than the actual technical term, and hence there should be a redirect page. Moreover, its a more standard title for wikipedia, like other military surrender articles.--ArmanJ (talk) 14:16, 15 June 2013 (UTC)

redirect deletion attempts

Stop all your efforts to get the redirect deleted except for the RFD. Do not remove the RFD tag from the redirect, let it run its course and an uninvolved admin will evaluate the discussion and decide if it should be deleted. Any other tactics to try to get the redirect deleted will be considered disruptive and you may be blocked. GB fan 18:23, 15 June 2013 (UTC)

I have already started an RfD. Thanks for your warning. Faizan 06:47, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

Why did you withdraw in the first place then? --Zayeem ^(talk) 07:08, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

I went for an CSD. But now, the previous record of the RfD has also been restored. Faizan 07:13, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.

IMPORTANT CHANGES: We have modified the selection of articles SuggestBot suggests and altered the design to incorporate more information about the articles, as described in this explanation.

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Content	Headings	Images	Links	Sources	Tagged with…
592		Pakistan Muslim League (N) (talk)						Add sources
5		Pitts Modern School (talk)						Add sources
106		Court system of Pakistan (talk)						Add sources
94		Neetu Singh (born 1990) (talk)						Add sources
128		Shas (talk)						Add sources
398		Akbar Bugti (talk)						Add sources
66		Makhdoom Ahmed Mehmood (talk)						Cleanup
27		Bangladeshi Declaration of Independence (talk)						Cleanup
2		Karikkakom Devi Temple (talk)						Cleanup
11		M8 motorway (Pakistan) (talk)						Expand
26		Index of Pakistan-related articles (talk)						Expand
191		2013 in British music (talk)						Expand
15		Syed Qasim Mahmood (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
429		Culture of Pakistan (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
1,001		India–Pakistan relations (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
89		Pakistan–Russia relations (talk)						Merge
258		History of the Punjab (talk)						Merge
30		Ejector venturi scrubber (talk)						Merge
131		West Pakistan (talk)						Wikify
35		Latif Khosa (talk)						Wikify
9		Alexander Smith Cochran (talk)						Wikify
166		Gujjar, Pakistan (talk)						Orphan
3		Anis Ebeid (talk)						Orphan
5		Transcendental model (contextual theology) (talk)						Orphan
53		Government of Punjab, Pakistan (talk)						Stub
10		Karam Ali Shah (talk)						Stub
53		Nayyar Hussain Bukhari (talk)						Stub
7		Tamil Nadu Industrial Explosives Limited (talk)						Stub
18		Chief Justice of the Federal Shariat Court (talk)						Stub
3		Sethi Town (Haji Camp) (talk)						Stub

Talkback

Hello, Faizan. You have new messages at Kashmiri's talk page.
Message added 12:12, 16 June 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

kashmiri ^TALK 12:12, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

Potential RFC/U

Because you supported corrective action regarding my improperly-filed ANI about USer:Baboon43's conduct, I am contacting you per Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/User_conduct/Guidance#Qualification. Would you be interested in endorsing such an RFC/U? You can view the draft at sandbox. If you agree, I grant my consent for you to edit my sandbox as needed in order to make that endorsement apparent. MezzoMezzo (talk) 06:46, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

I had my response here. So now at the Request for comment on the user conduct, am I eligible to endorse it as "Users who tried and failed to resolve the dispute."? Faizan 08:09, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

This is where I'm not entirely sure. This is the first time I've tried this so to be safe, it might be better - if you do choose to endorse, as there's no pressure - to stamp under the "Additional users endorsing this cause for concern" section. I don't want to end up improperly filing anything again, you know what I mean? MezzoMezzo (talk) 08:43, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

Sure, endorsing it as an additional user. Faizan 08:46, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

Buggle

Hi. Any idea why your Huggle didn't add the proper warnings to User talk:117.193.163.233? It appears to be stuck after the first, while we both reverted that IP a number of times. Did you get errors or a crash?  Yintan  12:31, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

Eh. An unknown error may be there, I got "Failed to retrieve" error while warning him. Faizan 12:33, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

Hm... annoying. There's still a few bugs in that thing.  Yintan  12:44, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

Latest change on the "Albanophobia" article

Dear Faizan, I really found your article very well written. The only thing I wanted to change on it was the name "Republic of Macedonia". Being a Greek, it is unacceptable for me to read an article refering to a state named Macedonia. The terms: "Macedonia", "Macedonian people", "Macedonian language" and everything else called "Macedonian" is nothing more than terms refering to the Greek civilization. After all the Republic's name is only constitutionally called "Republic of Macedonia". This state is officially recognised by the United Nations as "the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia" or "the FYROM" and it is not in any case recognised as the "Republic of Macedonia". If we have to be clear in our articles we have to write everything as it must be written. After all the only thing I did, was to change a dispute name and write the real name of the country, which is official and makes no dispute, since it has been agreed by Greece, the country itself and by the rest of the world's UN states. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Elias Raptis (talk • contribs) 13:35, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

Hello Elias. I think I had interaction with you before too. I don't own that article. The article's name is "Republic of Macedonia". I think, you should go through the previous thread of discussion. Faizan 13:45, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) Hi Elias. We've gone over that many times already and the current name of the article follows WP conventions. More info here and here. Γειά σας,  Yintan  14:38, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

I'm BracketBot

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to 2013 Quaid-e-Azam Residency attack may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• [[File:PKR100REV.jpg|thumb|A 100 [[Pakistani rupee|rupee]] note featuring the [[Quaid-e-Azam

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:20, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

 Fixed Thanks, BracketBot. Faizan 14:22, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

Signature messed up !

Hey dude my signature sucks how do I sort it out ha ha ! 86.151.237.220 (talk) 21:03, 17 June 2013 (UTC)