Talk:The Sarah Jane Adventures

The Sarah Jane Adventures has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
January 1, 2012	Good article nominee	Listed

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Doctor Who Top‑importance

	Doctor Who portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Doctor Who, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Doctor Who and its spin-offs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this notice, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Doctor WhoWikipedia:WikiProject Doctor WhoTemplate:WikiProject Doctor WhoDoctor Who
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

BBC Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject BBC, an attempt to better organise information in articles related to the BBC. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join us as a member. You can also visit the BBC Portal.BBCWikipedia:WikiProject BBCTemplate:WikiProject BBCBBC

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tasks for WikiProject BBC:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Improve BBC, BBC News (TV channel) and BBC News to Good Article status following previous reviews, create BBC Computer Literacy Project (in light of forthcoming 30th anniversary)
Cleanup : Chucklevision - references and general clean-up, Pebble Mill Studios - over-detailed and long, BBC World Service Television - unreferenced and confusing
Copyedit : BBC News, Broadcasting House
Expand : Top 20 start-class BBC articles with most importance: BBC Japan, BBC World Service Television, BBC Lifestyle, BBC Two Northern Ireland
NPOV : Criticism of the BBC (See comments)
Stubs : Stub-Class BBC articles
Other : *Restructure the category
- Add infoboxes to the BBC articles without infoboxes
- Add free-use images to biographical articles where possible
- Add references to Goa Mix (see assessment) and Coat of arms of the BBC
- Return Dad's Army to a Good article. (See comments)
- Reassess BBC following improvements to article.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archives

Archive 1

Airdate for final episodes

Someone inserted October into the introduction as the airdate for the final episodes. So far only one source - Doctor Who Magazine - has speculated this date. The BBC has yet to announce when it will air and bear in mind this year Doctor Who is airing in the fall, so that may result in the SJA episodes airing later than usual (perhaps even around Christmas). Also, once the change was made the sentence no longer reflected the information in the cited source at the end of the sentence; when changing such info you need to make sure the source still matches - or is replaced by an updated source. 68.146.78.43 (talk) 13:01, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Images Missing from Sarah Jane Adventures Episode Pages

I have noticed there are a number of SJA episode pages that do not have images the list is below i will tick them off as and when they are completed.

Invasion of the Bane Y
Eye of the Gorgon
From Raxacoricofallapatorius with Love
Prisoner of the Judoon
The Mad Woman in the Attic
The Eternity Trap
Mona Lisa's Revenge
The Gift

Thanks Kelvin 101 (talk) 17:24, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Audio Adventures page

I have started of the first audio adventures page as requested above The Glittering Storm Thanks Kelvin 101 (talk) 18:33, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article?

I'm hestitant as I say this but is this article a Good Article? And if it is not what needs to be done to improve it? Regards Rafmarham (talk) 17:01, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:The Sarah Jane Adventures/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Grandiose (talk · contribs) 12:17, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I will conduct a full review once certain things have been addressed, which need to be done within 7 days:

Please address all citation needed and original research tags.

Article on hold. Grandiose (me, talk, contribs) 12:17, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article needs a thorough copyedit. For example, there should be no space between consecutive references; the standard of English is poor in much of the article. Consider the audiobooks section alone:

"Series star" - not encyclopedic wording;
"Minute" should not be capitalised, and, preferably, with a non-breaking space before it;
"called "The Monster Hunt" written by Trevor Baxendale, read by Anjli Mohindra this episode" - grammar.
"Both parts can only be downloaded by finding aliens" really? surely this gimmick is not notable. The fact they can be found on the website is sufficient;
"Sarah Jane Adventures" - self redirect;
"Website" - should be "website"
"It is unclear if these will be the last stories, ending with the series, or if they will carry on after series 5 has ended." - poorly worded for an encyclopedia.

See if you can apply these ideas to the whole article. Grandiose (me, talk, contribs) 15:49, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Amazon is not a reliable source and these should be replaced. Grandiose (me, talk, contribs) 17:41, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Who would you recomend to be a reliable source? Thanks Kelvin 101 (talk) 14:53, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Any independent media source that mentions the existence of such a DVD, preferably. I'd be prepared to accept one from the BBC or its affiliates in these locations, though. Grandiose (me, talk, contribs) 18:10, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The references for the existence of DVDs and Blu-ray have been changed to BBC Shop and 2 Entertain links which are official BBC websites. thanks Kelvin 101 (talk) 18:38, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

There are some others in the "audiobooks" section. Grandiose (me, talk, contribs) 19:36, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Audiobook section is references have been amended, I think the Novelisations has a lot of Amazon references so i will find other official references for them. Thanks Kelvin 101 (talk) 15:24, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Novelisations section references has now been amended is there anything else that needs to be done. Thanks Kelvin 101 (talk) 16:18, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry to do it it drabs, but #18 isn't broken and #73 and #74 need more details (date, page, ISSN(?)). Grandiose (me, talk, contribs) 21:21, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above items you described have no been resolved thanks Kelvin 101 (talk) 16:25, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The citation needed tags need filling with citations. Grandiose (me, talk, contribs) 17:20, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

All Citations have now been resolved. Thanks Kelvin 101 (talk) 18:02, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please expand the section that I have now marked as requiring expansion. I think that may be all. Grandiose (me, talk, contribs) 19:57, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have expanded on the Critical response section. Tsange ☯ Talk 18:30, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Although I would have liked some more "reputable" critics, there's enough there to satisfy the criteria. Passing. Grandiose (me, talk, contribs) 19:22, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]