Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Future Korean War (2nd nomination)
AfDs for this article:
- Future Korean War (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
complete speculation, belongs on a blog, not an encyclopedia. There is already a page for OPLAN 5027, which already contains enough WP:Crystal Mztourist (talk) 10:47, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2013 July 4. Snotbot t • c » 11:15, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
- Delete as an original essay and violation of the spirit of WP:CRYSTAL (hopefully and presumably this event never comes to pass). Serious Korean geopolitics is already being written about at North Korea–South Korea relations, for example; there is no need for a compendium of the opinions and "predictions" of publicists and talking heads. Carrite (talk) 15:36, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:49, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:49, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:49, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:CRYSTAL. Speculation about a future conflict doesn't constitute an encyclopedia article but an essay....William 20:23, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
- Keep per some in the previous AfD - WP:CRYSTAL only applies to unverifiable speculation, unlike this article - consider it like World War III. It could use a better title and better writing, but the subject passes WP:N. Ansh666 03:26, 5 July 2013 (UTC)