Jump to content

Talk:Kusilvak Census Area, Alaska

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 108.48.209.62 (talk) at 01:47, 11 July 2013 (Poverty; at risk: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconAlaska Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Alaska, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Alaska on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.


Untitled

Wondering how to edit this U.S. Borough Entry?
The WikiProject U.S. Counties standards might help.

Poverty; at risk

The article says, "The census area's per-capita income makes it one of the poorest places in the United States." But what is the per-capita income?

Joel Achenbach writes in the Washington Post (http://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/style/fires-tornadoes-asteroids-how-we-prepare-for-looming-disaster/2013/07/10/29169e90-e59a-11e2-aef3-339619eab080_story_1.html) "[T]he Hazards and Vulnerability Research Institute at the University of South Carolina . . . has published a map showing the social vulnerability to disaster of every county in the United States. It’s a resilience map that takes into account such things as poverty, age and the percentage of people with special needs. The five most vulnerable counties are, in order, the Bronx; Wade-Hampton in Alaska; Manhattan; Buffalo, S.D.; Daniels, Mont."

Note that Wade-Hampton is right up there, with two much more famous boroughs. This claim is notable enough to be in Wikipedia. Some one should research it.

108.48.209.62 (talk) 01:47, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]