Jump to content

Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Brmull (talk | contribs) at 00:43, 13 July 2013 (Undid revision 564042268 by Brmull (talk) one more chance). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

    Report active, obvious, and persistent vandals and spammers here.

    Before reporting, read the spam and vandalism pages, as well as the AIV guide. To submit, edit this page and follow the instructions at the top of the "User-reported" section. For other issues, file a request for administrator attention.

    Important!
    1. The edits of the user must be obvious vandalism or obvious spam.
    2. Except for egregious cases, the user must have been given enough warning(s).
    3. The warning(s) must have been given recently and there must be reasonable grounds to believe the user(s) will further disrupt the site in the immediate future.
    4. If you decide that a report should be filed place the following template at the bottom of the User-reported section:
      • * {{Vandal|Example user or IP}} Your concise reason (e.g. vandalised past 4th warning). ~~~~
    5. Requests for further sanctions against a blocked user (e.g., talk page, e-mail blocks) should be made at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
    6. Reports of sockpuppetry should be made at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations unless the connection between the accounts is obvious and disruption is recent and ongoing.
    This noticeboard can grow and become backlogged. Stale reports are automatically cleared by MDanielsBot after 4–8 hours with no action.
    You can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

    This page was last updated at 10:12 on 26 December 2024 (UTC). Purge the cache of this page if it is out of date.


    Reports

    User-reported

    No edits since being warned. Re-report if this user continues vandalising or spamming after sufficient warnings. JamesBWatson (talk) 19:55, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    This seems to be more inexperience than straight vandalism. SpencerT♦C 15:37, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    Note: Hearfourmewesique, you may want to contact Kww directly if the edits are disruptive as he has warned the IP in the past.Jezebel'sPonyobons mots 17:04, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    (Non-administrator comment) Edits are not vandalism. Please ensure recent edits constitute vandalism before re-reporting. This same IP was reported (and declined) a few hours ago for the same reason. WikiPuppies bark dig 19:56, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]