User talk:212.183.140.21

February 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to attack other editors, as you did on User:Ged UK. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Jrod2 (talk) 12:37, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page West Exe Technology College. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. --Gnowor^T_C 22:46, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

March 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Phoebe Tonkin has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. The Thing // Talk // Contribs 16:18, 8 March 2010 (UTC) [reply]

February 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Aamer Anwar, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. PatGallacher (talk) 01:07, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for repeated abuse of editing privileges. Please stop. You are welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. -- Ed (Edgar181) 12:55, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Andrew Lonergan, you may be blocked from editing. Materialscientist (talk) 23:32, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Kasper Schmeichel, you may be blocked from editing. Materialscientist (talk) 23:32, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

August 2011

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Dave Grohl, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --Bongwarrior (talk) 10:26, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

November 2012

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Toddst1 (talk) 21:48, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

212.183.140.21 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

No evidence of the alleged misdemeanour has been offered. This is a dynamic IP, not a person, so the block is meaningless anyway, and likely to be misinterpreted by untrained administrators, such, apparently, as the one who made this block, as implying that all people who are allocated this IP address are the same person, and should also be blocked, even when, through no conscious action of their own, they are allocated another IP by the clever ISP software. 212.183.140.21 (talk) 13:32, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=No evidence of the alleged misdemeanour has been offered. This is a dynamic IP, not a person, so the block is meaningless anyway, and likely to be misinterpreted by untrained administrators, such, apparently, as the one who made this block, as implying that all people who are allocated this IP address are the same person, and should also be blocked, even when, through no conscious action of their own, they are allocated another IP by the clever ISP software. [[Special:Contributions/212.183.140.21|212.183.140.21]] ([[User talk:212.183.140.21#top|talk]]) 13:32, 29 July 2013 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=No evidence of the alleged misdemeanour has been offered. This is a dynamic IP, not a person, so the block is meaningless anyway, and likely to be misinterpreted by untrained administrators, such, apparently, as the one who made this block, as implying that all people who are allocated this IP address are the same person, and should also be blocked, even when, through no conscious action of their own, they are allocated another IP by the clever ISP software. [[Special:Contributions/212.183.140.21|212.183.140.21]] ([[User talk:212.183.140.21#top|talk]]) 13:32, 29 July 2013 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=No evidence of the alleged misdemeanour has been offered. This is a dynamic IP, not a person, so the block is meaningless anyway, and likely to be misinterpreted by untrained administrators, such, apparently, as the one who made this block, as implying that all people who are allocated this IP address are the same person, and should also be blocked, even when, through no conscious action of their own, they are allocated another IP by the clever ISP software. [[Special:Contributions/212.183.140.21|212.183.140.21]] ([[User talk:212.183.140.21#top|talk]]) 13:32, 29 July 2013 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.