User talk:Fideliosr

Dabangg 2

Hello Fideliosr,the ref you added here is correct one but after some time the content will be changed but url remains same.So we prefer not to add it as i did it earlier.I hope you would notice this.Well then,keep up good work---zeeyanketu ^discutez 11:50, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Chennai Express

Yes, of course. They also need spacings, to make the section easy to read.----Plea$ant 1623 ✉ 05:26, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If not indicine then double check the critic reviews it reported.

We cannot continue to use BOI as it is now showing huge difference.

We can't just ignore other reliable trade websites and trade experts who give same data and BOI who has started to show nett gross figures less by 4-5 crore for a single day.Its high time we should discuss on wikipedia that Box Office Mojo can't be compared to Box Office India.BOxofficeMojo data are used by trade websites in Holllywood,but BOI data is not used.The Alexa ranking of BOI is way below which proves that BOI i not much searched website .For high grossing Bollywood films we have to go with reliable trade websites.I am also fan of BOI,but when huge disparity comes,I try to avoid BOI.See below some more reliable Wiki websites who quote Chennai express first day collections at Rs 33.12 crore,beating Ek tha tger.Even BOI has decred Ek tha tiger figures from its previous Rs 31.25 crore to Rs 30.25 crore.What the hell is BOI doing?

http://www.dnaindia.com/entertainment/1872682/report-chennai-express-mints-rs33-12-crore-on-opening-day
http://www.hindustantimes.com/Entertainment/Bollywood/Shah-Rukh-Khan-starrer-Chennai-Express-mints-Rs-33-crore-on-opening-day/Article1-1106072.aspx
--Tarandhoni (talk) 17:24, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No. There's always difference between data of Box Office India and other trade publications. The former's figure is always lesser than latter. Same is the case with Chennai Express. Fideliosr (talk) 18:10, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]