The Protocol for the Prohibition of the Use in War of Asphyxiating, Poisonous or other Gases, and of Bacteriological Methods of Warfare, usually called the Geneva Protocol, is a treaty prohibiting the first use of chemical and biological weapons. It was signed at Geneva on 17 June 1925 and entered into force on 8 February 1928. It was registered in League of Nations Treaty Series on 7 September 1929.[4] The Geneva Protocol is a protocol to the Hague Conventions of 1899 and 1907.
A number of countries submitted reservations when becoming parties to the Geneva Protocol, declaring that they only regarded the non-use obligations as applying to other parties and that these obligations would cease to apply if the prohibited weapons were used against them.
History
In the 19th century Great Britainused chemical weapons at war [citation needed] and others planned to use it. In the Hague Conventions of 1899 and 1907 the use of dangerous chemical agents were outlawed.
In spite of this, chemical warfare was done in large scale in the First World War. Already in 1914 France used teargas. The first large scale application was by the German Empire in Ypres, Kingdom of Belgium in 1915, when chlorine gas was released as a defensive measure at a Canadian led attack leaving lots of wounded and a few killed. After the introduction, most warfaring countries engaged in a chemical arms race, including Great Britain, Russia, Austria-Hungary, USA and Italy. It resulted in a vast range of horrific chemicals affecting lungs, skin, or eyes, and some were intended to be lethal on the battle field, like hydrogen cyanide, and efficient methods of deploying agents were invented. At least 124 000 tons was produced during the war. In 1918 about one grenade out of three was filled with dangerous chemical agents. As protective equipment developed, also the technology to destroy such equipment became a part of the race of armament. About 1% of the fatalities and 4% of woundings of the Great War can be attributed to the use of gas, but the terror inflicted on the soldiers was an even bigger effect.
At the 1925 Geneva Conference for the Supervision of the International Traffic in Arms the French suggested a protocol for non-use of poisonous gases. The Second Polish Republic suggested the addition of bacteriological weapons. It was signed on 17 June.[6]
In the Second World War, the USA, Great Britain and Germany prepared the resources to deploy chemical weapons, stockpiling tons of them, but refrained from their use due to the balance of terror: the probability of horrific retaliation. Great Britain collaborated with USA in the development of the weapons. Soviet Union kept their development secret but they did have the facilities to produce chemical weapons.
After the war thousands of tons of shells and containers with tabun and sarin and other chemical weapons were disposed of at sea by the allies.
Historical assessment
Eric Croddy, assessing the Protocol in 2005, took the view that the historic record showed it had been largely ineffectual. Specifically it did not prohibit:[6]
use against not-ratifying parties
retalliation using such weapons, so effectively making it a no-first-use agreement
use within a state’s own borders in a civil conflict
research and development of such weapons, or stockpiling them
Despite the U.S. having been a proponent of the protocol, the U.S. military and American Chemical Society lobbied against it, causing the U.S. Senate not to ratify the protocol for 50 years.[6]
State parties
To become party to the Protocol, states must deposit an instrument with the government of France (the depositary power). Thirty-eight states originally signed the Protocol. France was the first signatory to ratify the Protocol on 10 May 1926. El Salvador, the final signatory to ratify the Protocol, did so on 26 February 2008. As of May 2013, 138 states have ratified, acceded to, or succeeded to the Protocol,[3] most recently Moldova on 4 November 2010.
Reservations
A number of countries submitted reservations when becoming parties to the Geneva Protocol, declaring that they only regarded the non-use obligations as applying to other parties to the Protocol and that these obligations would cease to apply with respect to any state, or it's allies, which used the prohibited weapons. Several Arab states also declared that their ratification did not constitute recognition of, or diplomatic relations with, Israel, or that the provision of the Protocol were not binding with respect to Israel. Subsequently, numerous states, including the former Czechoslovakia prior to its dissolution, have withdrawn their reservations and are now fully bound by the provisions of the Protocol.
According to the Vienna Convention on Succession of States in respect of Treaties, states which succeed to a treaty after gaining independence from a state party "shall be considered as maintaining any reservation to that treaty which was applicable at the date of the succession of States in respect of the territory to which the succession of States relates unless, when making the notification of succession, it expresses a contrary intention or formulates a reservation which relates to the same subject matter as that reservation." While some states have explicitly either retained or renounced their reservations inherited on succession, states which have not clarified their position on their inherited reservations are listed as "implicit" reservations.
The Protocol was ratified by the Coalition Government of Democratic Kampuchea in exile in 1983. 13 states (including the depositary France) objected to their ratification, and considered it legally invalid. In 1993, the Kingdom of Cambodia stated in a note verbale that it considered itself bound by the provisions of the Protocol.[26]
^ abcdefghijklmnopqrsAccording to the Vienna Convention on Succession of States in respect of Treaties, states which succeed to a treaty after gaining independence from a state party "shall be considered as maintaining any reservation to that treaty which was applicable at the date of the succession of States in respect of the territory to which the succession of States relates unless, when making the notification of succession, it expresses a contrary intention or formulates a reservation which relates to the same subject matter as that reservation." Any state which has not clarified their position on reservations inherited on succession are listed as "implicit" reservations.
The first international agreement limiting the use of chemical weapons, in this case, poison bullets.
1874
Brussels Convention on the Law and Customs of War
Prohibited the employment of poison or poisoned weapons, and the use of arms, projectiles or material to cause unnecessary suffering.
1899
1st Peace Conference at the Hague
European Nations prohibited "the use of projectiles whose sole purpose is the release of asphyxiating or harmful gases".
1907
2nd Peace Conference at the Hague
The Conference added the use of poisons or poisoned weapons.
1919
Treaty of Versailles
Prohibited poison gas in Germany (Added by E.Arms).
1922
Treaty relating to the Use of Submarines and Noxious Gases in Warfare
Failed because France objected to clauses relating to submarine warfare.
1925
Geneva Protocol
Prohibited the "use in war of asphyxiating, poisonous or other gases, and of all analogous liquids, materials or devices" and "bacteriological methods".
1972
Biological and Toxins Weapons Convention
No verification mechanism, negotiations for a protocol to make up this lack halted by USA in 2001.
1993
Chemical Weapons Convention Signed
Comprehensive bans on development, production, stockpiling and use of Chemical Weapons, with destruction timelines.
^Papanicolopulu, Irini; Scovazzi, Tullio, eds. (2006). "Quale diritto nei conflitti armati?" (in Italian). Giuffrè Editore. pp. 231–237. Retrieved 5 August 2013.