User talk:220.245.146.235

Welcome!

Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account!

Your IP address, 220.245.146.235, is registered to TPG Internet Pty Ltd and is believed to be a static address used by only one connection. However, this IP address may represent more than one user, accessing the Internet via several personal computers or devices.

To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free.

If you are autoblocked repeatedly, contact your Internet service provider or network administrator and request it contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on its proxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user.

Administrators: review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, consider a soft block using Template:Anonblock.

If vandalism is noted from this IP address, abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for investigation.

Network administrators, to monitor this IP address for vandalism, can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

May 2013

Your recent editing history at The Name of the Doctor shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Anaxial (talk) 17:40, 12 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

July 2013

When editing artcles, please take care to ensure that your edits are appropriate. This edit summary includes some fundamental flaws that are addressed on the talk page. Season 6 isn't airing, despite your asssertion (it won't start for 2 months), the table isn't what is being referred to, the section titled "Season 6: (2013) is what is being referred to, and so on. Please do not edit the article again without first discussing on the article's talk page. --AussieLegend (✉) 05:35, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at List of Castle episodes shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. --Drmargi (talk) 07:35, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

IP hopping to avoid the appearance of 3RR won't work; it's easy to track your IP. --Drmargi (talk) 07:36, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Message to Drmargi

Didn't IP hop. I returned home today, so naturally I'll have a different IP. Get your facts straight before you start accusing people. Also:

"Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly."

How about you and "AussieLegend", as much of a legend he is not, take that into consideration? I'm just as much an author as you are.

220.245.146.235 (talk) 08:08, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

3RR breach

Based on your acknowledgement above that you are the IP who added the table entry to List of Castle episodes, it appears that you have now breached the three-revert rule at that article. As a result, you may find yourself blocked from editing at any time. --AussieLegend (✉) 08:52, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That's four on this account, and two more from your work account. --Drmargi (talk) 09:34, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

As of right now, the count is 6 on this account in the past 9 hours.[1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6] --AussieLegend (✉) 14:59, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You.. You can.. YOU CAN COUNT? :O 220.245.146.235 (talk) 15:14, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

@AussieLegend

You should say the same to yourself, "mate". ;)

Well no, I can't. I chose to disengage after your first edit under this IP. You have continued to edit war after a receiving a 3RR warning and then notification that you had breached 3RR. You've refused to discuss on the talk page, which is what we normally do when there is a content dispute, which is why I started the discussion there. --AussieLegend (✉) 10:08, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. --Drmargi (talk) 09:54, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

Regarding this edit summary, it isn't just a matter of looking at the talk page, you need to discuss your edits. They are obviously disputed and in such situations we follow WP:BRD, we don't continue to edit war as you are doing. That achieves nothing. As you have now reverted 6 times in the last 9 hours you will most certainly be blocked, so you should start discussing now, at the very least as a token of good faith. While discussing disputed edits, the status quo prevails, which means you shouldn't be bulldozing your edits back into the article as soon as they are reverted by another editor (3 of us so far). --AussieLegend (✉) 15:14, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Let's discuss, then! I'd like a cupcake, please. ^^ Also, only two. You, "Legend", and Drmm-y boy over there! 220.245.146.235 (talk) 15:18, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think you appreciate the gravity of the situation. You should be attempting to collaborate. Ding so might reduce the length of the block. Puerile responses serve no purpose. --AussieLegend (✉) 15:24, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Really? How far's the stick been shoved up your ass? xD I've done my edits, you've done yours. I see no problem with my edits, so I continue to put them back. Nothing to see, nothing to talk! ^^ 220.245.146.235 (talk) 15:32, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Continuing to put your edits back into the page will ensure only one thing, that you will be blocked from editing. Wikipedia works on consensus, collaboration between editors is essential and at the moment, with the opposition to your edits, when you are blocked, consensus will likely result in your edits being reverted again, since you are clearly unwilling to justify their inclusion. --AussieLegend (✉) 16:37, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for your disruption caused by edit warring and violation of the three-revert rule. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Mark Arsten (talk) 17:33, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Z10

August 2013

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Teen Wolf (season 3) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Teen Wolf (season 3) was changed by 220.245.146.235 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.862627 on 2013-08-18T09:04:33+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 09:04, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Teen Wolf (season 3). Your edits have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. Ochristi (talk) 19:24, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.