Jump to content

User talk:8.19.13.19

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by HasteurBot (talk | contribs) at 13:43, 19 August 2013 (User:HasteurBot: Notification of CSD:G13 potential nomination of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Gomadam). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.


October 2011

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Samuel de Champlain, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

November 2011

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Valley Forge, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

Hello and welcome! I edit Wikipedia too, under the username Glane23. Wikipedia is written by people like you and me, so thank you for taking the time to participate. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to Kendrick with this edit, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions about editing, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Template:Z85 Geoff Who, me? 18:11, 12 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Kendrick. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Tgeairn (talk) 18:14, 12 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Sabre (fencing). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Sabre (fencing) with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Wikipelli Talk 18:06, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

December 2011

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Snowboarding, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Snowboarding was changed by 8.19.13.19 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.875068 on 2011-12-15T05:36:36+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 05:36, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lily_Mazahery, you may be blocked from editing. Please refrain from posting blatantly false and unverified information, as you have done to the Lily Mazahery page. Your actions constitute vandalism and are disruptive editing. Allconsidered 00:22, 16 December 2011 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Allconsidered (talk • contribs) 00:22, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

January 2012

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Sputnik 1, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Sputnik 1 was changed by 8.19.13.19 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.976429 on 2012-01-13T16:54:52+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:54, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Great chain of being, you may be blocked from editing. -- Obsidi♠n Soul 21:49, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Elizabeth of Russia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Reaper Eternal (talk) 16:28, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JohnCD (talk) 16:38, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

March 2012

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Genre fiction, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Genre fiction was changed by 8.19.13.19 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.987633 on 2012-03-20T16:42:56+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:42, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Genre fiction with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Joydeep (talk) 16:47, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Genre fiction with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Joydeep (talk) 16:51, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

April 2012

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Nazism with this edit, did not appear to be constructive, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Excirial (Contact me,Contribs) 19:02, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Bushido. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Allens (talk | contribs) 19:02, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Dalisays (talk) 02:09, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

May 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Steven Mond has been reverted.
Your edit here to Steven Mond was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://www.flickr.com/photos/shavar/5879344631/) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. an image file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy and therefore probably should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 17:58, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Steven Mond. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Tgeairn (talk) 18:36, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Steven Mond with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Я£ΙИӺΘЯСΣĐᴙᶕᵻᴎᵮᴓᴚᴐᶒᵯɘᴎᴛᶊTalk 19:53, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Steven Mond with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Я£ΙИӺΘЯСΣĐᴙᶕᵻᴎᵮᴓᴚᴐᶒᵯɘᴎᴛᶊTalk 19:56, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Steven Mond, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Allens (talk | contribs) 18:00, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback on List of English Monarchs

Hi, Thank you for your feedback, the page List of English Monarchs shows the Monarchy of England, since the Act of Union the monarchy has actually been Bristish as it covers all the UK not just England, please try List of British Monarchs to answer your question instead. I hope that this helps you and I apologise for any confusion this caused, I will investigate whether we can make the article any clearer to avoid any confusion in future. Thank you once again for your feedback, Jamietw (talk) 17:59, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

September 2012

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Great chain of being, you may be blocked from editing. Chiswick Chap (talk) 21:08, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Steven Mond

I reverted your recent edit involving Steven Mond because it appears to be vandalism, If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia you will be blocked from further editing. Vincelord (talk) 14:01, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

November 2012

Hello, I'm Moe Epsilon. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Charles Krauthammer because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Regards, — Moe Epsilon 22:52, 9 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2013

Hello, I'm Widr. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to Matt Dallas, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Widr (talk) 21:17, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

February 2013

Hello, I'm Rocketrod1960. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Rowland Hall-St. Mark's School because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Rocketrod1960 (talk) 09:25, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Gomadam concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Gomadam, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 13:43, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:8.19.13.19&oldid=569223104"