User talk:Pleasetry

Welcome

Hello, Pleasetry! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Яehevkor ✉ 11:03, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

June 2012

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is invited to contribute, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Gun politics in the United Kingdom, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you.
I went back in the page history and the version you changed it from is how it has been written in the past. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 14:16, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit was inaccurate and has been reverted.Discuss it on the talk page if you think otherwise. Pleasetry (talk) 14:22, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've started a discussion on the article's talk page regarding the change you made to the first sentence on 11:37am at 28 June 2012. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 14:59, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Gun politics in the United Kingdom & wikibreak

I'm taking a wikibreak until the 4th or 5th, sorry for the inconvenience, but regarding Talk:Gun politics in the United Kingdom I haven't lost interest, just can't respond for a few days. Looking forward to catching up on the discussion in a few days. Regards, Callanecc (talk • contribs) talkback (etc) template appreciated. 15:02, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Pleasetry. You have new messages at Talk:Gun politics in the United Kingdom.
Message added 12:20, 6 July 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Callanecc (talk • contribs) talkback (etc) template appreciated. 12:20, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Suzuki Inazuma 250

The article Suzuki Inazuma 250 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unremarkable motorcycle.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hello71 (talk) 03:21, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Rob Douglas

Re your de-prod and comment "We can just find new links". Please do. I tried and couldn't find anything which wikipedia would consider a reliable source--Scott Mac 12:21, 14 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring, as you did at Gun politics in the United Kingdom. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Lord Roem ~ (talk) 15:34, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Pleasetry (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The edits were justified in the talk page and the other offending parties have not been blocked despite their edit warring and WP:WL conduct. The offending edits also remain Pleasetry (talk) 18:20, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Whether or not the edits were justified, you were edit warring, and that's not acceptable. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 18:34, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Article probation

Thank you for your contributions to the encyclopedia! In case you are not already aware, an article to which you have recently contributed, Men's rights movement, is on article probation. A detailed description of the terms of article probation may be found at Talk:Men's rights movement/Article probation. Also note that the terms of some article probations extend to related articles and their associated talk pages.

The above is a templated message. Please accept it as a routine friendly notice, not as a claim that there is any problem with your edits. Thank you. -- Sonicyouth86 (talk) 11:56, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Men's Issues

Ranze proposed a WikiProject Men's Rights: Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals/WikiProject Men's rights.

I have gone ahead and created a candidate page for WikiProject Men's Issues and will make the page an actual WikiProject page once enough people sign up and give their input. I think it would be useful to have a place where work together to prepare material and arguments to respond to people who try to apply double standards to articles about men's rights.

Interested? Ummonk (talk) 04:48, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]