Jump to content

User talk:Almost Famous

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Almost Famous (talk | contribs) at 01:43, 5 June 2006 (→Your threat via email). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Archive
Archives
  1. April 2006 – May 15, 2006

Please remember to remain civil.

Firstly, as per your request, I archived your talk page. Keep in mind that talk page guidelines for archiving suggest no more than 32KB per page, in which yours was considerably under. But I'm happy to oblige nonetheless.

I have noticed that in recent edits, you have ignored WP:CIVIL, WP:NPA and WP:AGF, among others. (See: [1], [2]). Please try to keep a cool head when dealing with problematic edits. Personal attacks are never acceptable and are a quick way to a long block. I wouldn't hope for that on any potential editor and I hope that you edit peacefully and productively.


You can help improve the articles listed below! This list updates frequently, so check back here for more tasks to try. (See Wikipedia:Maintenance or the Task Center for further information.)

Fix spelling and grammar
None

Help counter systemic bias by creating new articles on important women.

Help improve popular pages, especially those of low quality.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Happy (and civil!) editing, Wes! • Tc 07:17, 16 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

May 2006

Please do not remove warnings from your talk page or replace them with offensive content. Blanking your talk page will not remove the warnings from the page history. If you continue to blank your talk page, you will lose your privilege of editing your talk page. Thanks. Wes! • Tc 18:01, 16 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please read

Regarding recent edits [3], [4], [5]: Please do not make personal attacks on other people. Wikipedia has a policy against personal attacks. In some cases, users who engage in personal attacks may be blocked from editing by admins or banned by the arbitration committee. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Please resolve disputes appropriately. Thank you. If you would like to resign from Wikipedia, please pursue the options in WP:CHU, rather than adding unsupported personal attacks[6] to my talk page. Wes! • Tc 23:16, 18 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Images

When an image is listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems is not enough just to assert that it's in the public domain; you have to give a source and some reason to believe it's in the public domain. Also, do not remove the imagevio tags; you may comment and the admin will read your comment, but the tag has to stay until the image has been processed. You've been warned about this before. I have deleted Image:Aucocisco.jpg and Image:Custom House Wharf.jpg. Chick Bowen 19:27, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NPA

Please do not make personal attacks on other people. Wikipedia has a policy against personal attacks. In some cases, users who engage in personal attacks may be blocked from editing by admins or banned by the arbitration committee. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Please resolve disputes appropriately. Thank you. Chick Bowen 20:25, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Old Post Card of LI

Thanks for e-mailing me, I did my best to save your image--but it looks like they're out to delete your additions. My suggestion is not to worry about the images, if they don't want them it's their loss not yours. Looks like favortism to me, but eh, who cares, right? Take care my friend. Don't worry about the island's article--if I can I'll reupload the post card with the proper copyright status so no one messes with it. Livin' Large 18:14, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for nothing. Almost Famous 17:40, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NPA

Please do not make personal attacks on other people. Wikipedia has a policy against personal attacks. In some cases, users who engage in personal attacks may be blocked from editing by admins or banned by the arbitration committee. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Please resolve disputes appropriately. Thank you. Master of Puppets That's hot. 04:58, 25 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Old_Photograph.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:59, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have fixed the photograph tag for you, and confirmed its source. Please be a bit nicer, and don't take this stuff so seriously. Livin' Large 22:03, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This is of course directed to Almost Famous and his/her temper, and not the bot. Livin' Large 22:04, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Removing warnings and other content

This is your last warning. Removing warnings from your talk page is considered vandalism. You will be blocked from editing Wikipedia and your talk page will be protected from editing if you do it again. While it is acceptable to remove non-hostile comments once they've been dealt with, this line of reasoning is inapplicable to perceived civility issues and warnings regarding personal attacks. Wes! • Tc 05:19, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for disrupting Wikipedia by making personal attacks. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires. AmiDaniel (talk) 06:42, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your threat via email

I am utterly mystified why you would threaten another person for editing Wikipedia policy violations of Wikipedia:Fair_use, Wikipedia:Verifiability, and Wikipedia:Copyrights.

It is Wikipedia official policy that "The threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is verifiability, not truth. This means that we only publish material that is verifiable with reference to reliable, published sources."[7]

If you would like to discuss my edits, please read the official Wikipedia policies I linked to above, plus Wikipedia:Civility. I will be happy to discuss any edits you feel are improper.Econrad 21:25, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dude, you need to chill with the reverting. That's my point. It's annoying. Almost Famous 23:18, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please be aware that threats, even if indirect ("I would like to know who you are in real life... but it would be best not to tell me"), can be cause for being blocked. From {{Threatban}}: "Users who make threats, whether legal, personal, or professional, that in any way are seen as an attempt to intimidate another user, are immediately blocked."

I don't want to get on your back, but I wanted to give you a friendly heads-up that you may want to be a little more careful about what you say -- I know a user who was recently blocked for sending threatening e-mails, so it does happen. Even if you didn't mean "I would like to know who you are in real life... but it would be best not to tell me" as a threat, some people could interpret it as such and might get you in trouble.

Happy editing, Hbackman 01:01, 3 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Just a friendly reminder; you say that the pages "are not [his]". Correction; every time you click that little Save Page button, you're agreeing to release your contribution under the GFDL license, effectively making them everyone's and noone's. So he has as much right to edit it as you do. Master of Puppets FREE BIRD! 01:06, 3 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, it's Eric Norcross. See User:Sevenlinefeatures for more information.  RasputinAXP  c 01:59, 3 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
It's all good. I am utterly mystified at the idea that one man believes that HE and HE alone has the right to edit a certain article. Mr. Conrad doesn't seem to believe that anyone else has the right to edit the Casco Bay articles except him and him only--he's a fucking moron and I detest him and this site for allowing him to have hand over that group of articles. You all betray the public's trust. Almost Famous 01:43, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Almost_Famous&oldid=56925832"