Davide Lazzeretti
Davide Lazzaretti (1834-1878) was the leader of the Giusdavidic Church in Italy (Monte Amiata). Killed in a clash with the Carabinieri (19th century). The dramatic climax appears to be linked to the suggestive power of the Messianic prophecy. After a wait of prayer and fasting duration 3 days, David can not defer more than the fulfillment of the prophecy which announced, and, driven by the expectations it has aroused, goes in procession to meet his destiny.
[1]
For some people, Lazzaretti was an impostor. Among these are counted the experts, who saw in David a political agitator: “we suspect that Lazzaretti intended a double goal, provoke a religious fanaticism and propagate a political party -- the first aim was merely a pretext, the second was his main objective.” Others have hypothesized that there might have been imposture at the beginning. David could have simulated, but then he would have been imprisoned in the acted part. Barzellotti writes: “A singular condition of mind with spirit, this, for which reason he, like so many others of the same nature, began perhaps by playing a part in public, in which there was a great amount of self-love and the craving for popularity, and ended with believing himself, with being in fact, for as much as it depended on him, the personage he had assumed.” And also a doctor, Dr Bottoni, so Verga reports, had supported this interpretation: “It is assumed that is, that, moved by an over-riding ambition, he had right from the start to get himself looked upon as a prophet, an envoy from God, and that by dint of speaking of the visions he had been privileged to have, of the high mission he had received from God, he had finished up by himself believing in this and in that” . Barzellotti did not turn a blind eye, moreover, to the psychopathological elements: “In that so far I have said not only that I do not exclude, but presuppose that he might have been insane, that the morbid impulses, manifest in him from his youth, were then such, especially in the later years of his life, as to dominate his will entirely.” Had Lazzaretti the “will to believe” (in the sense given to it by William James)? Had he used trickery, such as, for instance, impression of the mark on his forehead? Is he to be considered, at least so far as genealogical claims go, an impostor? This question raises the matter of impersonation. For Verga, the central element was that given by the hallucinatory experience. The happenings of visions and hallucinations support the structuring of delirious themes and “open the way to madness.” [2]
The Bible wisely warns: "of that day and hour no one knows, no, not even the angels" (Matthew 24:36). It is true, however, that the faithful are encouraged to be aware of the signs of times. Hence it is not surprising that believers feel legitimized in their interest for what should remain inscrutable. There will continue to be expectations – of Christ, of the end of the world, of the New Age, of extraterrestrial saviours… – and disappointments following failed prophecies. But we know that, "when prophecy fails" [4], followers sometimes persevere and are not discouraged to try again. Scholars with backgrounds in various disciplines have undertaken to explore the fascinating world of apocalypticism in its various forms. But there is still a lot to do in order to understand better the dynamics of apocalyptic movements.
The names of David Lazzaretti and the Giurisdavidica Church are not unknown to the small circles of millenial experts.
- ^ Mario Di Fiorino Se il mondo non finisce. Quando la profezia non si avvera. Forte dei Marmi, 1996
- ^ Mario Di Fiorino “If the world does not end. When the prophecy plays false! , Massarosa, 1999.
- ^ Jean-François Mayer “The end of the world: between religious hopes and secolar fears” Forward of “If the world does not end. When the prophecy plays false! Mario Di Fiorino , Massarosa, 1999.
- ^ Leon Festinger et al., When Prophecy Fails: A Social and Psychological Study of a Modern Group that Predicted the Destruction of the World, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1956.