User talk:Zeeyanwiki

Click here to leave me a message.

I am currently very busy with no proper internet access and will not be able to respond quickly to queries for a little while.---zeeyanketu ^{talk to me}

|

My Talk Archives

Archive 1	Archive 2	Archive 3
Archive 4	Archive 5	Archive 6
Archive 7

This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by when more than 3 sections are present.

Welcome back?

Can you explain what you meant by this edit? Has Satyamcompany been away and returned? It's not obvious that he/she has. JamesBWatson (talk) 13:03, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for this but i am pretty sure about him as a sock.---zeeyanwiki ^discutez 18:13, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Khiladi 786 Music CD Cover.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Khiladi 786 Music CD Cover.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 05:12, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Khiladi 786 Album Art issue

Dear Zeeyanwiki

As you have noticed I had removed the previous picture of Khiladi 786 Soundtrack Infobox. Well I did that because in Official Mp3 releases the album art are generally square dimension-ed but the one you uploaded had dimensions which are not generally found in album arts. But then I realised the work 'CD Cover' and YES CD covers are not square but your picture rather looks like a poster instead of a CD Cover anyways I decided to keep both of them

My one - "Mp3 Cover"

Your one - "CD Cover"

If you are still not satisfied regarding the issue you can post on my talk page.

Regards Soham

--Sohambanerjee1998 (talk) 11:33, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Chennai Express.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Chennai Express.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:10, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Great news!

Great news! Kahaani has just passed the FAC! ----Plea$ant 1623 ✉ 17:24, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

re United States

It's such a gigantic topic, and one that so many people have such strong opinions about, that it's very difficult to get to a quality status. It's close but it's a slow push getting there. --Golbez (talk) 21:28, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Hi

Oh, then how are you now? Anyways, Jab Tak Hai Jaan had undergone a peer review while you were absent and is currently a GA nominee. Check the article, it is much better shape then before. Regards, ----Plea$ant 1623 ✉ 16:45, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers BRO

Thank you for clearing my confusion.

Regards

Sohambanerjee1998 talk 16:49, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Mail

Hello, Zeeyanwiki. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

----Plea$ant 1623 ✉ 12:53, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Chennai Express box office

Hi,

I would appreciate any input you have in an almost certainly sockpuppet led nuisance relating to the acknowledgement of sources other than Box Office India for Chennai Express, despite us having a consensus for several years that uses BOI only (which has maintained uniformity for so long). Please see the talk page when you can, thanks. Factual Proof (talk) 19:31, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Good news!

Good news! Jab Tak Hai Jaan has just passed the GA review! And plus, it is your first GA!----Plea$ant 1623 ✉ 13:10, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

STiki emergency

Chennai Express/ Box Office India

Hi. I've got the Satyashiva/ Tarandholi company banned thru an SPI and two other groups of sockpuppets also. Your views would be welcome here. Fideliosr (talk) 03:26, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Radharani

Hi, I have warned him not to create vandals. But since he won't talk, I think we can just block him. Kailash29792 (talk) 06:38, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Boxofficeindia.com

Hi Saw your comments on user Sohambanerjee1998's talk page about Boxoffice where you said:-

"Person's like Komal Nahta are assosiated with Bollywood so their comments,updates and figures might be wrong and biased because they probably got money to give better reviews.Whereas BOI is independent website who tracks only boxoffice figures and yes reliable newspapers can be wuoted in case BOI delays.We create a consensus for BOI following a discussion few years back".

I have some questions, what is known about Boxofficeindia's ownership ? How has the conclusion been reached that it is "Independent", and who all were involved in the discussion about BOI because I would like the discussion to be reopened, some years ago it was the "only" site that had regular figures for all releases and though at times there were delays there was no other source, the situation now is different and in fact it is Boxofficeindia now that seems to be lagging, where figures are reported the other websites numbers are not any difference so the claim of bias and wrong is not substantiated by actual experience, and for us to call Boxofficeindia independent we should have some news about it's ownership too, if all this has already been discussed if you could point me to where it was discussed it would cut a long discussion short, else request that this be discussed again in light of things changing on the ground over the last few years. Injun Gone Loco (talk) 06:57, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]