Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Midnight Memories

Midnight Memories

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It is way WP:TOOSOON to have an article about an upcoming 1D album article that was only first announced a couple of days ago. A big amount of news sources came up in a google search, but they only announce the release details, and thats not enough. Since when did the amount users not understanding the meaning of a WP:CRYSTALBALL and WP:NOTNEWS start to increase? I'm hoping to god there won't be any retarded WP:ATA#CRYSTAL arguments in this discussion. 和DITOR E tails 22:14, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect - no need to delete the article, since it will be released soon. After all, it's an album by an undoubtedly popular band. It's notable on it's own merit, but if it needs to be cleared for now, make it a redirect. RazorEye ⡭ ₪ ·o' ⍦ ࿂ 22:27, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 01:20, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 01:20, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]