Jump to content

User talk:88.104.27.75

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 88.104.27.75 (talk) at 06:03, 15 September 2013 (→Block notice: u). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

September 2013

Information icon Hello, I'm SFK2. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! See WP:POINT SFK2 (talk) 04:47, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Information icon Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. PLEASE NOTE: Simply being unreferenced is not excuse enough to remove a section. Rather, if a substantial amount of content is unreferenced, it's far better to seek out references for the content rather than simply removing it (unless of course info falls under other violations like BLP, In popular culture, etc.). Please make every attempt to source content (or correct it) using reliable sources before removing content. Thank you.    DKqwerty    05:03, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Eh? What removal? 88.104.27.75 (talk) 05:05, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
These: [1], [2], [3], [4].    DKqwerty    05:10, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Per WP:BURDEN and WP:V, you cannot reinstate those edits unless you can provide appropriate references. 88.104.27.75 (talk) 05:14, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
WP:BURDEN states, "burden of evidence lies with the editor who adds or restores material." I've neither added to nor restored any of your edits. However, I'll note that WP:BURDEN in no way gives permission for section blanking. The more logical course of action is to take these issues to article talk pages, or simply find a contradictory and reliable ref and correct the info; but blanking is not acceptable behavior without more salient issues being involved, like BLP or IPC.    DKqwerty    05:22, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Nope, incorrect. Read it again. 88.104.27.75 (talk) 05:26, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Per WP:BURDEN, "Any material lacking a reliable source directly supporting it may be removed. Whether and how quickly this should happen depends on the material and the overall state of the article. Editors might object if you remove material without giving them time to provide references; consider adding a citation needed tag as an interim step." You've done none of the actions prescribed by the very policy you're citing. This is my last comment regarding this issue, as you're clearly operating under WP:IDHT    DKqwerty    05:40, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

September 2013

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to The Key School with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Tbhotch.™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 05:16, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to The Key School. Tbhotch.™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 05:28, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I only removed unsourced content - per the wikipedia guidelines. Please, explain the problem?
I won't, first, you are not my boss, second WP:V is not a justification to edit-war. It is not an exception to the WP:3RR, which you have violated. Third, you are reported at ANI, so I suggest you to stop "applying" policies to articles under a lack of understanding those policies. In case you didn't know, like >70% of all Wikipedia articles are unsourced or contain unsourced information, are we removing it? No. Stop, or this will end up at AIV and EWN. Tbhotch.™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 05:32, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I prefer WP:IAR, because you neither are following WP:V, just applying it to justify edit-wars and blankings pages: "Any material lacking a reliable source directly supporting it may be removed. Whether and how quickly this should happen depends on the material and the overall state of the article. Editors might object if you remove material without giving them time to provide references; consider adding a citation needed tag as an interim step. When tagging or removing material for lacking an inline citation, please state your concern that there may not be a published reliable source for the content, and therefore it may not be verifiable. If you think the material is verifiable, try to provide an inline citation yourself before considering whether to remove or tag it." Did you attempt to try to verify the information? No, because you blanked four pages in a few minutes. And considering chatting won't work with you, as you still believing it is justified and V is a shield, I'll report you to the WP:EWN for edit-warring. Tbhotch.™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 05:43, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Stop icon

Your recent editing history at The Key School shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Tbhotch.™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 05:44, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Welcome to Wikipedia! Listed below are some brief introductions containing all the basics needed to use, comment on, and contribute to Wikipedia.

If you want to know more about a specific subject, Help:Help explains how to navigate the help pages.

Where next?

  • If you wish to express an opinion or make a comment, Where to ask questions will point you in the correct direction.
  • If you would like to edit an article, the Basic tutorial will show you how, and How to help will give you some ideas for things to edit.
  • If you would like to create a new article, Starting an article will explain how to create a new page, with tips for success and a link to Wikipedia's Article Wizard, which can guide you through the process of submitting a new article to Wikipedia.
  • For more support and some friendly contacts to get you started, the Editors' Welcome page should be your next stop!

See also

Good luck and happy editing. Gtwfan52 (talk) 05:48, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Teahouse logo
Hello! 88.104.27.75, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Gtwfan52 (talk) 05:49, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Continuous Removal

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. EzPz (talk) 05:51, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Block notice

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.  - Barek (talk • contribs) - 05:57, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

88.104.27.75 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please provide a reason as to why you should be unblocked.
Change {{unblock}} to {{unblock | reason=your reason here ~~~~}}

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=original unblock reason |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=original unblock reason |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=original unblock reason |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

I am blocked; I request posting onto ANI

"I only removed unsourced claims from an article,

Please tell me why I've been blocked?"

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:88.104.27.75&oldid=572980978"