Jump to content

User talk:JakobSteenberg/Archives/1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< User talk:JakobSteenberg

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by ClueBot III (talk | contribs) at 13:08, 3 October 2013 (Archiving 1 discussion from User talk:JakobSteenberg. (BOT)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.


hi!

Teahouse logo
Hello! JakobSteenberg, you are invited to join other new editors and friendly hosts in the Teahouse, an awesome place to meet people, ask questions, and learn more about Wikipedia. Please join us! --Rosiestep (talk) 02:25, 24 August 2012 (UTC)

Those hairy Latins

Good call. Latin has many words for hair, it seems. It all rather depends what type of hair it is.

Badly laid out, from Google Translate:

caesaries hair, curls, locks, long hair, hair of the beard

capillus - hair, beard, wool, hair of the beard

crinis = hair, long hair, tentacle, tail

capillatura - hair, false hair

coma - hair, coma, lock, plume, mane, aigrette

pilus - hair, trifle

saeta - thick, hair, bristle, coarse, brush

seta - thick, hair, bristle, coarse, brush

villus - hair, shaggy hair, nap of clothes

umbra - ghost, shade, shadow, dark, darkness, hair

plantaria - sets, slips, hair, cuttings

capillatio - hair

From this list I have no idea which one to choose Fiddle Faddle (talk) 13:40, 16 November 2012 (UTC)

Infobox location

Hi, thanks for tweaking anatomy articles. However, I noticed that your are systematically placing infoboxes above dablinks and maintenance tags. WP:LEAD recommends the opposite. Is there a good reason for changing this in anatomy articles? --Fama Clamosa (talk) 06:36, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

OK. I thought those edits had something to do with the information on your user page: "users of Nomina Anatomica have easy access to information on wikipedia". I'm not going to revert you, but someone will sooner or later because most editors conform to the WP:MoS guidelines. Happy editing! --Fama Clamosa (talk) 14:41, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

R from alternative language

You have new message/s Hello. You have a new message at Wdchk's talk page. – Wdchk (talk) 01:47, 20 December 2012 (UTC)

A page you started has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Anterior surface of the heart, JakobSteenberg!

Wikipedia editor Senator2029 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

When creating a redirect, please categorize it too. See Template:R template index for a list of templates to use.

To reply, leave a comment on Senator2029's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Thanks

Thanks for posting at WP:MED2013GA. Great choice. Let me know if you need any assistance! Best. Biosthmors (talk) 00:00, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

No problem! I'll try to rephrase that a bit. =) Thanks for your work on anatomy articles. Do you want to bring any of those up to GA status? If so, feel free to list there still. Do you have any particular targets? No worries about feeling "unqualified". I brought DVT up to GA without a M.D. (I'm pre-med also). Thankfully, some M.D.s have given me feedback (see Wikipedia:Peer_review/Deep_vein_thrombosis/archive3). I'd like to get it to become a featured article relatively soon. Best! Biosthmors (talk) 00:21, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

I'll try to push it on someone! What if I tried to push human anatomy on you?! ;-) I could help out with that one. I should read up on that subject for myself anyways. Interested? Biosthmors (talk) 00:38, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

It seems like the whole Approaches section should be mostly meaningful prose instead of being a list in line with WP:PROSE and WP:SS. So section(s)/paragraph(s) should exist to summarize the human nervous system, etc. That's the biggest opportunity I see for improvement. Human body gets a lot of views too. I'm not sure why separate articles are really needed at this point, but whatever. Biosthmors (talk) 04:21, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

Translation request

Hi Jakob, is it possible for you to translate this page to Danish? ●Mehran Debate● 12:46, 30 January 2013 (UTC)

Sure. I will post a first draft below later along with a question or two. Before I start, you use the term reader, is it okay if I translate this to browser (That is the term used in Danish as well)?
But when I am done you might want to throw it by another native Danish speaker since some of the terms like Portable Pre-indexed ZIM is hard to make a proper translation of without making it sound like a machine translation. --JakobSteenberg (talk) 12:55, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
Thank you very much buddy. This is excellent and adequate for me. So quick and nice job :) ●Mehran Debate● 15:07, 30 January 2013 (UTC)

I submitted your translation here. There is an article named Kiwix and it doesn't have a Danish version. It would be good if you can create this article in your Wikipedia too, you can do that in your free time and there is no rush! Thanks again and best wishes ●Mehran Debate● 05:23, 31 January 2013 (UTC)

Tibia

I was going through tibia and I noticed a fair amount of overlinking so I recommend trying the script at Wikipedia:Highlight duplicate links to spot these! I ordered some textbooks but it will be a while before they arrive. Not so much in time for February! Do you have an idea for what kind of anatomy article you might want to work on in March? I'd like for it to be something that lists at the WP:5000 consistently from being so popular. Best. Biosthmors (talk) 01:32, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

Thanks, I will look into it. Hmm... I was planning on doing more work on the leg and since arteries and veins have been suggested on Anatomy project then starting on femoral artery and working my way down through out march. I have not found anything on the top5000 that really cought my interest, but I only got to 3000-and-something... any suggestions since you ask? --JakobSteenberg (talk) 10:01, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

Article Feedback deployment

Hey JakobSteenberg; I'm dropping you this note because you've used the article feedback tool in the last month or so. On Thursday and Friday the tool will be down for a major deployment; it should be up by Saturday, failing anything going wrong, and by Monday if something does :). Thanks, Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 22:30, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, JakobSteenberg. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Media_copyright_questions#Creative_Commons_Attribution-Noncommercial_3.0_United_States_License.
Message added SPhilbrick(Talk) 14:28, 11 March 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

The Signpost: 18 March 2013

The Signpost: 25 March 2013

The Signpost: 01 April 2013

The Signpost: 08 April 2013

Fascial spaces of the head and neck

Hi again. Work is ongoing on these articles. So far we have these which I have either created or reworked:

Wouldn't mind you taking a look at one of the pages I have reworked or created and pointing out any style errors, as I usually don't make anatomy articles. Thanks. There are also several more that need to be created or reworked I feel... will get around to these in the coming days:

Lesion (talk) 13:53, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for feedback. I have altered the current headings of these facial space spaces to reflect the MEDMOS, but I don't have content to fill some of the others, other animals etc.
A category I think would be good. Re a template, option is either to stick these new pages onto a template that already exists (maybe Template:Mouth anatomy or Template:Digestive tract- which already has a few pharyngeal fascial spaces listed) or create a new one. Not sure of best way to proceed with regards templates. There is no rush, it will take me a while to rework all the articles of this topic anyway. Lesion (talk) 10:55, 11 April 2013 (UTC)
Not sure if fascial spaces have a ==function==, it is just connective tissue filling a space. Maybe you could say that fascia is to lubricate muscles so they can move a bit within the surrounding tissues...but I'm not sure the fascial spaces have a purpose. Lesion (talk) 12:54, 11 April 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for creating that category. I have added 2 more pages to it, canine space and infratemporal space. I have thought more about what template(s) are best. Some of these spaces are not immediately adjacent to the mouth (and therefore also the digestive tract). Perhaps this would make the inclusion of some of them (e.g. superficial temporal space) on the templates for mouth anatomy and for digestive system anatomy inappropriate? I think a new template would be good. I might be able to copy an existing template with minimal changes. Thanks gain for your help and advice. Lesion (talk) 18:19, 13 April 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 15 April 2013

new article: dorsal nexus

Hello we are working on a new article about dorsal nexus for our project, it would be nice if you check our advances in this sandbox. ¨User:Thelmadatter/Sandboxes_Group_1/Dorsal_Nexus Thanks --Kenshinb (talk) 16:12, 24 April 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 22 April 2013

The Signpost: 29 April 2013

The Signpost: 06 May 2013


Eng. WP s.v. Ulna

Hello JakobSteenberg,

There is no etymology section s.v. Ulna. I think it is relevant for the reader to know that Latin ulna means both “elbow” and “forearm” – and so does Classical Greek ὠλένη. In fact, the primary meaning is “elbow”, cf. the root *elei-, “to bow”.

In Danish you can’t possibly use albue if you intend to say underarm – at least not today. The same obtains for English. In French it is a bit mixed-up, and French WP doesn’t really clear up things, see French WP s.v. Ulna, a word which has taken over “a part of” Latin ulna, so to say, i.e. the bigger bone of the forearm. The headword Ulna should therefore be changed to Cubitus. Even Modern Greek, when resuscitating the term ὠλένη (which is a purely medical term today), they adopted the semantic content from French.

I happen to be a classical scholar – at least I was until I proceeded in other directions – I bowed my arm, if you like. :- )

Best greetings from Hirpex (talk) 22:02, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 13 May 2013

The Signpost: 20 May 2013

The Signpost: 27 May 2013

The Signpost: 05 June 2013

The Signpost: 12 June 2013

June 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Buck's fascia may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:32, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Lobes of thyroid gland may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • [[cricoid cartilage]]s, the [[Vertebrate trachea|trachea]], the [constrictor pharyngis inferior]] and posterior part of the [[cricothyreoideus]] muscles, the [[esophagus]] (particularly on the

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:19, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Library now offering accounts from Cochrane Collaboration (sign up!)

The Wikipedia Library gets Wikipedia editors free access to reliable sources that are behind paywalls. Because you are signed on as a medical editor, I thought you'd want to know about our most recent donation from Cochrane Collaboration.

  • Cochrane Collaboration is an independent medical nonprofit organization that conducts systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials of health-care interventions, which it then publishes in the Cochrane Library.
  • Cochrane has generously agreed to give free, full-access accounts to 100 medical editors. Individual access would otherwise cost between $300 and $800 per account.
  • If you are still active as a medical editor, come and sign up :)

Cheers, Ocaasi t | c 20:12, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

Redirects

Dear Jakob,

I will create redirects later this day regarding the nomenclatorial changes I have made in some articles (editing with an iPad is not that easy at all). By the way, I try to make multiple redirects as you have seen, that take into account multiple versions and guidelines of the Nomina Anatomica, Nomina Histologica, Nomina Embryologica, and the Terminologia Anatomica and Terminologia Histologica. And the orthography changes all the time, e.g. anulus->annulus->anulus, oesophagus->esophagus->oesophagus,aquaeductus->aqueductus->aquaeductus(in TH or Terminologia Embryologica). And of course the textbooks and atlases that use corrected forms, e.g. glandula parotis. By the way, by categorizing these redirects, they are beautifully alphabetically ordered on the category:stub-class page. Thanks for the good work, with kind regards, Wimpus (talk) 08:53, 15 June 2013 (UTC)

Dear Jakob, I have made a start with the redirects. Tomorrow more redirects. With kind regards, Wimpus (talk) 21:06, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
I have to do a lot more redirects. By the way, thank you for the redirect of discus proliger. You can find that form on google books. In Latin there are a few endings that loses the -us for the masculine form of the adjective, e.g. -fer, -ger. With kind regards, Wimpus (talk) 20:53, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 19 June 2013

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Oval window, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tympanum (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:56, 22 June 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 26 June 2013

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Posterior septal branches of sphenopalatine artery, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ethmoidal arteries (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:10, 2 July 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 03 July 2013

Sciatic Nerve

In reference to your addition for sciatic nerve. The jewish population constitutes less than 0.2% of the world population. And of that tiny group, a vast majority of jewish people do not keep kosher. So you have entered a cultural reference that is very obscure. It is also based on religious dietary restrictions, which should be kept to a separate page.

While interesting to some, there are plenty of better venues to discuss Jewish Law than on an anatomy page. And in reference to your assertion that this is not an anatomy page, I disagree. The vast majority of data on this page is factual anatomic information. Please refrain from adding unneeded material.

The sciatic nerve entry is a page within the Category: Nerves of the lower limb and lower torso. And this is a subset of Category:Lower limb anatomy. So this page is in an Anatomy section.

There is a separate entry for sciatic nerve associated with Jewish Law. A link to this page has been added under See Also.

A beer for you!

Thanks for reverting vandalism on mu user page - Enjoy!! Denisarona (talk) 10:54, 8 July 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 10 July 2013

The Signpost: 17 July 2013

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Carpal tunnel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Palm (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:11, 24 July 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 24 July 2013

Advice requested

Hi Jakob,

I ask for some advice regarding a potential COI with a user who has been making many edits to head and neck anatomy pages, but from the same source. Please see User_talk:PeggyDoll#Fehrenbach. Thanks, Lesion (talk) 11:15, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for getting back to me. I will try to follow your good advice in future, always to remember that what seems like a problem editor initially may turn into a good editor ... assume good faith as always I suppose. Anyway, the user in question is now not using the same source, but using a variety of sources. I have not reverted any edit they have done, they all appear to be constructive, apart from small things which appear to be accidental such as removing infoboxes... possibly due to visual editor bugs, who knows. By the way, congratulations on the semester abroad, sounds great. Lesion (talk) 02:37, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 July 2013

The Signpost: 07 August 2013

August 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Pectineus muscle may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • Origin = [[Pectineal line (pubis)|Pectineal line]] of the]] [[pubis (bone)|pubic bone]] |

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:46, 13 August 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 14 August 2013

The Signpost: 21 August 2013

The Signpost: 28 August 2013

The Signpost: 04 September 2013

The Signpost: 11 September 2013

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:JakobSteenberg/Archives/1&oldid=575574933"