Talk:List of content management systems

Computing: Software List‑class Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
List	This article has been rated as List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software.

Systems List‑class Low‑importance

	Systems science portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Systems, which collaborates on articles related to systems and systems science.SystemsWikipedia:WikiProject SystemsTemplate:WikiProject SystemsSystems articles
List	This article has been rated as List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is within the field of Systems.

Archives

Nov 2004 - Jan 2007
Feb 2007 - Dec 2008
May 2009 - Jan 2010
Feb 2010 - May 2013

Fedora Commons Removal Fedora Commons should be removed from this list. It is not a CMS. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.162.142.184 (talk) 21:38, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Request edit

It is requested that edits be made to the following semi-protected pages:

D (edit · history · last · links · protection log)
List is only of the most notable CMS' (edit · history · last · links · protection log)

This template must be followed by a complete and specific description of the request, that is, specify what text should be removed and a verbatim copy of the text that should replace it. "Please change X" is not acceptable and will be rejected; the request must be of the form "please change X to Y".

The edit may be made by any autoconfirmed user. Remember to change the |answered=no parameter to "yes" when the request has been accepted, rejected or on hold awaiting user input. This is so that inactive or completed requests don't needlessly fill up the edit requests category. You may also wish to use the {{ESp}} template in the response. To request that a page be protected or unprotected, make a protection request.

Please add Contentverse to both SaaS and Proprietary sections. www.contentverse.com. For SaaS - Name - Contentverse Web - Licensed version available - Yes, last stable version 2013, Web Content Management - yes, Group Content Management - yes, Enterprise Content Management - Yes. For Proprietary section - Name - Contentverse, Platform - Java, Supported databases - Oracle and SQL Server, Latest stable release 8.0, Licenses - Proprietary software, Latest release date - 2013, Web Content Management - Yes, Group Web Content Management - Yes, Enterprise Content Management - Yes.

I notice that this particular list article specifically says that it's a list of "notable" content management systems, but the Computhink Wikipedia article (the developers of ContentVerse) says they have less than 100 employees. When I do a quick Google search for lists of content management systems[1][2] ContentVerse doesn't seem to come up in other lists of CMS systems. I believe when/if the company grows it may become large enough for inclusion, but at the moment, the list doesn't appear to be intended to be comprehensive and the company doesn't appear to be notable. CorporateM (Talk) 15:33, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request on 28 September 2013

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

|IBM FileNet Content Management |Java |Oracle, DB2, MSSQL |5.2 |Proprietary software |2013 | Yes | Yes | Yes Haides.di (talk) 13:38, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Not done for now: Are you asking for an update to the "IBM Enterprise Content Management" line in the Proprietary software section (which links to this article), or for a new entry? If the former, we can proceed, but keeping the same name as now. If the latter, please note that there is an HTML comment in the article saying:

This is a list of NOTABLE CMSs, as judged by the existence of articles on Wikipedia. Please don’t add external links or wikilinks to nonexistent articles – instead, write an article to demonstrate notability. CMS without articles, redlinks, external links, and links to articles that aren’t about the CMS in question will be pruned periodically. Fill in the background info too, please, to make this article useful. Thanks.

so the right thing to do would first be to create such an article, then add the table entry. If you'd like to reply here, don't forget to change "answered=yes" to "answered=no" in the edit request to flag it for further attention. --Stfg (talk) 11:48, 5 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]