Jump to content

User talk:204.107.53.153

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Lugia2453 (talk | contribs) at 21:24, 16 October 2013 (Message re. Empiricism (HG)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

July 2011

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! I edit Wikipedia too, under the username Glane23. I noticed that one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Scotland with this edit, appeared to be unconstructive, and I’ve reverted it. In the future, please use the sandbox for testing and be sure to provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Please feel free to ask me questions about editing Wikipedia (or anything else) on my talk page. Template:Z54 Geoff Who, me? 23:07, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 204.107.53.153. You have new messages at Glane23's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

November 2011

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Racism in the United States. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. WikiPuppies! (bark) 23:56, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Racism in the United States, you may be blocked from editing. Acroterion (talk) 00:17, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is your last warning. The next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Mona Charen, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Acroterion (talk) 00:22, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Native American owned slaves

As you've been interested in removing the section, please consider contributing to the discussion here - Talk:Racism_in_the_United_States#Blanking_of_.22Native_American_owned_slaves.22 Thanks, Colonel Tom 21:58, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

October 2013

Information icon Hello, I'm Lugia2453. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Empiricism, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Lugia2453 (talk) 21:24, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]