Jump to content

Talk:Australopithecus anamensis

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 24.254.238.231 (talk) at 17:53, 25 October 2013 (→New link for the Seth Borenstein reference: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconPrimates C‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Primates, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Primates on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PrimatesWikipedia:WikiProject PrimatesTemplate:WikiProject PrimatesPrimate
CThis article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Homo antiquus praegens

I can't find any mention on Wikipedia of Homo antiquus praegens Ferguson 1989. This is a fossil hominin from about the same age or slightly earlier than Praeanthropus anamensis. If the same, the name Praeanthropus praegens (or Australopithecus praegens, or whatever) would have precedence. Does anybody know if this has been addressed in the literature? And why is there no page for praegens? 69.231.215.41 (talk) 00:50, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nice article

But it needs sources. WAS 4.250 22:50, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Confusing article

The 1965 and 1987 findings were of the same "specimen". Does that mean same individual? And the Leakey finds were of the same "hominid" - meaning same individual or just same species?

"Although they did not find hips, feet or legs ... the fossils ... include ... the upper and lower parts of a leg bone (tibia)." Contradiction.

Where is Kanapoi? Is it the "hillside east of Allia Bay"? Nurg 22:50, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Audio request

Someone please upload an audio pronunciation see how lots of issues | leave me a message 13:29, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Images needed

If you're discussing fossils, or long extinct species, you need images.

- Angel Eyes. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.104.139.212 (talk) 03:27, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

USA Today still carries a link to Seth Borenstein's AP article. http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/tech/science/2006-04-12-fossil-evolution-gap_x.htm

24.254.238.231 (talk) 17:53, 25 October 2013 (UTC) Mike[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Talk:Australopithecus_anamensis&oldid=578719357"