Jump to content

Talk:Cholinergic neuron

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Allison gainer (talk | contribs) at 14:34, 25 November 2013. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconNeuroscience C‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Neuroscience, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Neuroscience on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NeuroscienceWikipedia:WikiProject NeuroscienceTemplate:WikiProject Neuroscienceneuroscience
CThis article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconAnatomy C‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Anatomy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anatomy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnatomyWikipedia:WikiProject AnatomyTemplate:WikiProject AnatomyAnatomy
CThis article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article has not yet been associated with a particular anatomical discipline.


  1. Quality of Information (1/2): Images would have helped in maintaining my interest in the entire page. Not sure if this is applicable here or in the formatting section. In any case, I’ll only take a point in this section and not formatting.
  2. Article size (2/2): ~21000 bytes
  3. Readability (2/2): Great job putting scientific jargon into layman’s terms. Very easy to read.
  4. Refs (2/2): Very recent references that are journal articles.
  5. Links (1/2): Had some links but not enough to warrant a 2/2. Not sure if it’s because the information is not located elsewhere on Wikipedia, but a lot of unlinked things seemed like very basic concepts.
  6. Responsive to comments (2/2): Not applicable as there are no comments yet.
  7. Formatting (2/2): Great headings and subheadings.
  8. Writing (2/2): Looks like a lot of work went into this especially getting good sources.
  9. Used real name or has real name on User TALK page (2/2): KelseyGratton
  10. Outstanding? (1.5/2): Well written, but nothing really stood out to me. Not a bad article though!

Total: 17.5 out of 20 Jenna Fair (talk) 01:55, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  1. Quality of Information: 2 (a lot recent research articles)
  2. Article size: 2 (~20,500)
  3. Readability: 2 (extremely easy to follow, follows wikipedia guidelines)
  4. Refs: 2
  5. Links: 1 *Apply more wikipedia links throughout the paper. There are links in the beginning, but they become scarce throughout.
  6. Responsive to comments: 2 (<24 hours so I feel it is okay that a response hasn't been posted for the comment above)
  7. Formatting: 2
  8. Writing: 1 *easy to read, however, make sure you proof read and remove unnecessary commas and such.
  9. Used real name or has real name on User TALK page: 2
  10. Outstanding?: 1 *I think once more links are placed and it is proofread, it will be outstanding!

_______________ Total: 17 out of 20 Allison gainer (talk) 14:32, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Talk:Cholinergic_neuron&oldid=583236674"