Talk:Neuroenhancement
 | This article was the subject of an educational assignment in 2013 Q3. Further details were available on the "Education Program:Georgia Institute of Technology/Introduction to Neuroscience (Fall 2013)" page, which is now unavailable on the wiki. |
1. Quality of Information: 2
2. Article size: 2
3. Readability: 2
4. Refs: 2
5. Links: 2
6. Responsive to comments: 2
7. Formatting: 2
8. Writing: 2
9. Used real name or has real name on User TALK page: 2
10. Outstanding?: 1
Total: 19 out of 20
Final Comment: I liked the page, because it was interesting and definitely informative. Some of the sentences were run on and could be made shorter. I would also some add pictures to make this page more than just text. It basically just needs some fine tuning to be outstanding.
Dmodi6 (talk) 19:27, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Wiki Article Critique (Applies to Last Version before November 19)
1. Quality of Information: 2
2. Article size: 2
3. Readability: 2
4. Refs: 2
5. Links: 2
6. Responsive to comments: 2
7. Formatting: 1
8. Writing: 1
9. Used real name or has real name on User TALK page: 2
10. Outstanding?: 2
Total: 18 out of 20
Comments: This page has a lot of awesome information, but still needs some fine tuning. I think the format could be improved to make it easier to read. The paragraphs have a lot of great information, but can be a little lengthy. Maybe splitting them up into multiple paragraphs will make it easier to read. Also, there are some grammar errors (run ons, awkward sentences) that could be fixed to help improve the page. Overall, great article. It just needs a little bit of editing to be perfect! Crowen4 (talk) 01:25, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
Wiki Article Critique By Tuan Nguyen
1. Quality of Information: 2
2. Article size: 2
3. Readability: 2
4. Refs: 2
5. Links: 2
6. Responsive to comments: 2
7. Formatting: 2
8. Writing: 2
9. Used real name or has real name on User TALK page: 2
10. Outstanding?: 1
Total=19/20
This page is very interesting and has a lot of new information but i think you should break it down to smaller parts so it can be read easier. Other than that, this page is great. Awesome!