User talk:Yids2010

If I have left you a message: please answer on your talk page, as I am watching it.
If you leave me a message: I will answer on my talk page, so please add it to your watchlist.
Please click here to leave me a new message.

Take That

You may care to check your information at ASCAP.com. I have reverted Patience and quoted a reference, do you want to amend the others? Cheers. --Richhoncho (talk) 10:45, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, i'll sort it, thanks for pointing it out!

Yids2010 (talk) 01:09, 15 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Take That

Why is the release date of The Flood wrong? If you look below, you see that the release date of Denmark was October 15 and we always write the first release date above, don't we? So I don't see anything wrong with the info I wrote... Hello...--79.216.213.42 (talk) 20:03, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

because it wasnt officially released on that date, see the sources provided, the one you refer to was a leaked promo. Yids2010 (talk) 15:17, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Yids2010. You have new messages at Armbrust's talk page.
Message added 00:09, 7 February 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Armbrust ^Talk _Contribs 00:09, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Take That discog

hey, thought i'd explain some of my changes on here. 1) IRMA does not certify it's singles, so the irish flood certification is false. 2) their is no existing reliable source for the irish album chart pre-2000, so even if albums charted highly their is no way of proving it so they can't be included. 3) mediatraffic.de is a very very bad source for anything and it always contains mistakes. if it does indeed get it's sales info from music week, then find the music week article. 4) i removed the eu and italian certifications because their positions are not included in the tables. per WP:DISCOGSTYLE they should not be included. - i could not find the irish cert for the ultimate collection in the irma site, thats why that was removed. Mister sparky (talk) 20:33, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

haha it's cool, i don't always read things either lol Mister sparky (talk) 22:01, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No worries mate! Yids2010 (talk) 22:06, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

i removed the italian one cuz the positions aren't in the table, i wasn't saying it doesnt exist lol. Mister sparky (talk) 22:21, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It's live... and it may be more helpful than not

See Wikipedia:Future Films Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 07:17, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Tt progress.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Tt progress.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 03:55, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This has already been discussed and the deletion file has been removed as it does not meet WP:CSD guidelines. Yids2010 (talk) 12:07, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User

Hi Yids. I just wanted to ask a question. There is this user, Fatty2k10 who is continuing to remove sourced stuff (Gary Barlow now X Factor judges) and acting in an agressive manner, how can we stop him doing this? --SATURDAYmight. (talk) 09:14, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Itsbydesign

Yes, I know he's a trouble some user. There's no indication of why he's removing the information and sponsors are as important to the article, not some dumb rule he pointed out. Just keep in mind his one point, "not to cut/paste quotes", else if he fails to provide reasoning and continues to vandalize, raise an ANI thread and report him. Wikipedia does not need disruptive users like him. — Legolas ^(talk2me) 05:10, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

trying to figure out

I'm trying to figure out the purpose of this. Why would using a redirect to the template better than using the template itself? Am I missing something here? Best regards.--Muhandes (talk) 07:27, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Widespread edit war

Everyone needs to calm down and look at things more closely. Taking Shine (Take That song), for example, I discovered that the references to the Belgian Tip charts weren't correct: Swisscharts.com does not reflect Belgian Tip positions. I used the singlechart template, and now we have correctly referenced positions. I looked at the Czech chart, however, and it was fine: the reference indicates what to place in the search bar, and, when you do that, the Czech position shows as described. Everyone slow down, stop reverting each other, and actually check the material that is being put in and taken out. If this keeps up, it's possible that I'll block everyone involved.—Kww(talk) 17:00, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your involvement, it is very welcome. Yids2010 (talk) 17:06, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've determined that you were dealing with a long-term disruptive editor, Pesf. His strategy, however, seemed to be removing blocks of good data along with a little bit of bad. You really should go over the articles where you have been reverting Madiera1234 and check the material. There's probably at least one real problem mixed in with the invalid reverts.—Kww(talk) 19:46, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much, and yes I will check over the articles right now. Thanks again.Yids2010 (talk) 01:18, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Rule the World

I'm sorry but this is more of the same. Following Kww's advice I went over some of the deletes Madiera1234 did, and indeed Madiera1234's modus operandi is to remove good material with bad. In this case, you added to Rule the World a certification with a source that does not verify the fact. Neither the band nor the song appear on the page provided. On the spirit of our understanding I did not remove it, and I ask that you either provide a proper source, or remove the certification yourself. Best regards. --Muhandes (talk) 08:43, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

And I'm afraid another one on the same page. here you added another certification without verifying source. Best regards. --Muhandes (talk) 08:45, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Although I notified you of the above a week ago, you still have no corrected it. I really do not want to remove this, per our understanding, but you have to do your part of the deal, which is to either find reliable sources, or remove the material yourself. For now, I replaced the inappropriate sources with {{cn}}, but they should not stay there without a source. Please advise me on how you think this should be handled. --Muhandes (talk) 23:27, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This applies to the Polish chart for Kidz (song) as well. --Muhandes (talk) 00:16, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for handling these. I see that the pages were semi-protected, so I took them off my watchlist again. If you ever need me to put them back on let me know. --Muhandes (talk) 08:46, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No problem mate, thanks for your help and I will do. Yids2010 (talk) 09:55, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Gary Barlow

You have on multiple occasions removed fully-referenced and accurate information from this article without reason. Please refrain from doing so. If you wish to request its removal, do so on the Talk Page and provide justification for doing so within Wikipedia's guidelines. Jammy07 (talk) 17:33, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you feel so strongly about mentioning it then put it on the The X Factor (UK) article as it is about the show not individuals. It will continue to be removed from the Gary Barlow article as there is proof. What tabloids say is one thing but no statements have been made regarding it and insiders say it never happen. The definition of an inconclusive story. Yids2010 (talk) 17:38, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Barlow is mentioned specifically as being involved in the incident rather than any of the other judges. The story has been widely reported and not just in the tabloids, the references show. If you wish to remove it discuss it on the talk page of the article in question, not simply here. Jammy07 (talk) 20:16, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

They all quote one tabloid, The Sun, which carried an exclusive story heading when it was printed and the twist on the story is categorically denied on the last paragraph of the original article here. I understand you are acting in good faith but it is not appropriate for the article as there is no conclusive evidence. Best Yids2010 (talk) 22:44, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

TT

What is your problem with my edits PLEASE LEAVE THEM ALONE!!!! --Equalizer2011 (talk) 17:55, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Equalizer, you do not own "your" edits. Below the "Save Page" button on every edit window appears the text "If you do not want your writing to be edited, used, and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here." —KuyaBriBri^Talk 18:37, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Princess of China

Digital Spy published the mid week tally given by the Official Charts Company, what is your problem with it? Calvin • ^NaNaNaC'mon! 14:44, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It is not the official charts. It is the midweek charts. Therefore the song has not 'officially' charted until the OCC announce the charts at 7pm here. For even further clarification that the song has not charted see here Yids2010 (talk) 14:49, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Paradise

I provided the sources. If you find the Triple A format unacceptable (it is used on FA-class articles such as "Just Like Heaven (song)"). I will be happy to provide you a link to the current edition of the chart. :) Toa Nidhiki05 22:49, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks, however for future reference see WP:OTHERSTUFF, and the US Triple A chart can remain as it doesn't appear on the list of WP:BADCHARTS but again please consider this before adding charts and sources. Best Yids2010 (talk) 23:33, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I know exactly how OTHERSTUFF works, and looking to FA articles for formatting help is perfectly fine. Further, an 'unsourced' chart peak is not unpermitted under BADCHART, which is guideline, not policy. Removing 'unsourced' data without making any attempt to even look it up is not cool, in my opinion. Toa Nidhiki05 00:25, 31 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you know WP:OTHERSTUFF then that's cool, no problem. I simply removed an unsourced chart which seemingly misled the reader of the article. If I wanted to include it in the article then I would have avoided hassle and included the appropriate chart source. You have now, just bare it in mind for the future regardless of whether you think it is cool or not. Best Yids2010 (talk) 00:32, 31 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Beautiful World (Take That album)

Hi Yids2010. Had to revert this since it did not have a source and I could not find it in the source of the next sentence. Feel free to restore it with a reliable source. Best regards. --Muhandes (talk) 08:35, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Progress Live

Threats do not work with me. No discussion was had, no administrator "warned" me of anything. If you seriously want to throw a hissy fit over the placement of content, please let me know. Itsbydesign (talk) 00:35, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

As I stated, threats do not work on me. You edits will be reverted and I will follow this up with an ANI if you continue to act as if you own the article. Itsbydesign (talk) 13:12, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Take That

I see we both like Take That. How have I vandalised Wikipedia with "Eight Letters" exactly? It's a promotional song, maybe not a single (I was going to change that if you hadn't deleted the page again) but it still deserves its own page, just like all of the songs on David Bowie's "Hunky Dory" album. "Eight Letters" is an extremely popular song with fans and the band alike. It tells the story of Take That, documenting Robbie William's feelings about the band after he left the first time in 1995 (the second time being this year), and how everyone is on good terms now. Please give "Eight Letters" what it deserves: its own page. Thank you very much. — Preceding unsigned comment added by George Moore 1995 (talk • contribs) 20:22, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Firstly it isn't a single, they released a video montage of their tour with the song playing over it as promotion. Nowhere has there been an official annoucement that it is a single. If you read this here it states that When We Were Young was the final single to be released from this album/EP. We need to be impartial on Wikipedia and regardless of its popularity it doesn't fit the required criteria to have an article. With regard to your David Bowie statement it is irrelevant as per WP:OTHERSTUFF. Also Rob has not left Take That, their management rubbished the rumours and issued this statement here. Thank you for editing Wikipedia and for discussing this via my talk page but as said above no song deserves an article because the fans love it. For future reference please make sure that you sign your posts by typing four tildes at the end of your post. All the best, Yids2010 (talk) 23:35, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Gary has confirmed that Rob has left take that for the time being and they are "back to a four-piece". He said that it ended "perfectly". I suppose we'll have to wait and see! [[1]] If "Eight Letters" gets into the Top 100 at some point between now and the beginning of next year, do you think we could create an article for it? George Moore (talk) 11:08, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The official statement is that Rob will release a solo album and tour and that Gary is judging on X Factor, and that they are (as a 5 piece) on a break. Regardless of what Gary said we have to go with the official statements of the management. If Eight Letters is announced of a single or if anything significant happens to suggest it is worthy of an article then yes, of course, but at this moment in time there is no basis to create an article for an album track with a montage for a music video. Best, Yids2010 (talk) 13:37, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Alright then, I understand. Do you think "Look Back, Don't Stare" deserves its own article, just like "Take That: For the Record"? George Moore (talk) 13:55, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah if you fancy making it then that's fine, no problem. You should also look to source the DVD as it charted in the UK and Eire. Yids2010 (talk) 23:11, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Certification 1D album

i'm sorry i was reverting the daily vandalism i had to revert you or else i couldn't revert the other people before you. will not do it again. USER: AdabowtheSecond (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 13:00, 20 February 2012 (UTC).[reply]

References

Thanks for adding pertinent info to Diamond Jubilee of Elizabeth II. However, the supporting reference should use a Wikipedia citation template. Those can be found here: Wikipedia:Citation templates. Thanks. --Ħ MIESIANIACAL 15:51, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

List of songs?

Hi, i dont know if you can help me, but I notice most other artists have a link to a page documenting a complete list of their songs. Is there a reason why Take That do not? I would be happy to work to create one. --Jonie148 (talk) 20:18, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the support on the page --Jonie148 (talk) 20:10, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No problem Jonie, It looks good! Yids2010 (talk) 14:53, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 28

Hi. When you recently edited Open Road (Gary Barlow album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Madonna (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:42, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Teardropvideo.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Teardropvideo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:01, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

your message

 Which change are you referring to please?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.149.19.77 (talk) 22:43, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Love Ain't Here Anymore (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to IRMA

Sure (Take That song) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to IRMA

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:24, 26 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gary Barlow discography, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Worldwide (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:32, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Since I Saw You Last (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to The Metro, The Telegraph and McCartney

Let Me Go (Gary Barlow song) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to IRMA

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]