Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2006 June 13

< June 12	>

June 13, 2006

Template:Beograduni

Template:Academic Departments, University of Warwick

Template:Infobox musical artist

Deprecated template. Replaced by Template:Infobox musical artist 2. CG 08:26, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete accordingly. --Coredesat 08:27, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom.--SomeStranger^(t|c) 10:22, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - Why don't you merge the other into this one? The name would be more friendly, without the "2". Afonso Silva 12:49, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- When it gets deleted, I'll move the one with the 2 using a bot. CG 16:33, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WP:meat-puppet

No. its not useless, I use it very often. Just look at the pages linking ti it! I made it because I was tyred of writting [[Sock_puppet_(internet)#Meat_puppet|meat-puppet]], {{WP:meat-puppet}}, which I use very oftern, is much easier to write and to remember. I recently had much problems with meat-puppets.

Meat-puppetry is very serious problem here and it's neglected for ne reason. People have problem explaining what it is since it's rarelly discussed. This way, Im trying to make it more accessible.

So, it is very usefull for me, and it will be udes even more when we start writtinf WP:RFC for those meat-puppets we have problems with.

Please, leave it. --Ante Perkovic 07:41, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, useless template. --Coredesat 08:26, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WHY??? How can be used and usseless in the same tame? What is your problem? Does this template hurts someone??? Does it break any rules??? I need it and I use it! Besided, it is used on many pages and by removing it, those pages would be full of red link to this template!

I have enough trouble explaining people recent problems with Wikipedia:Meat-puppets and now you want to make it even hareder for me? Why?

Just, leave it alone, for wiki's sake! --Ante Perkovic 08:51, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

All right, then, I'll abstain. You've made a good argument. --Coredesat 09:14, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Whether or not this template is useful, it should still not have anything linking to it. Something like this is meant to be substituted, not included.--SomeStranger^(t|c) 10:19, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:TBA

Template:TBA (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Pretty useless, and for its purpose far too verbose. No real need for this template, and not even being used. Alfakim -- talk 14:37, 13 June 2006 (UTC) As of when is it not being used? I applied it in several places when I saw the "TBA" lack of conformity in different articles. Kashami 19:36, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Turkic

Template:Turkic (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
This template contains a lot of false information and (nationalistic) POV. Actually, this entire template is POV, like creating a template called "Germanic" and then counting all kinds of histrical kingdoms in it. This template is claiming dynasties and peoples as "Turkic" of whom we almost know nothing about, for example the Huns (a heterogenious group of all kinds of backgrounds, including Turkic, but certainly not predominantly Turkic), Avars (a totally unknown, probably Mongol tribal confederation), Hephthalites (a probably Indo-European, most-likely Iranian nomadic confederation), Khwarizmshahs (a dynasty of unknown origin), Mughals (a Persian-speaking dynasty of Mongol origin in India), etc etc etc. So, no matter how you look at it, it's filled with wrong information and POV, most of all because it propagates some kind of an "ethnic identity" that has not existed in those dynasties. Tajik 15:53, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - This template has many flaws as the nom points out.--WilliamThweatt 17:23, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - This template is very misleading and inaccurate. Nationalism of this sort is becoming rampant on WP we need more people dedicated to weeding these sorts of things out. It's going to hurt the reputation of WP if it's allowed to continue. --WilliamThweatt 17:23, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]