Jump to content

User talk:DemocraticLuntz

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 112.210.36.131 (talk) at 21:39, 25 December 2013. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.


A barnstar for you!

The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
Thank you for all the great work you are doing regarding demographics for Tennessee articles! :) SarahStierch (talk) 23:36, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Why?

Regarding this edit, what reasoning do you have? They seemed to be perfectly fine. If you have a valid reason, I would love to hear it. Thanks! bojo1498 talk 20:10, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I was just being overzealous (it seemed to clunk up the page but I agree it was harmless). I've gone ahead and reverted myself. DemocraticLuntz (talk) 20:17, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Cool, thanks! bojo1498 talk 23:28, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It's true

Ken Shamrock returning is true though. Look into the facts, buddy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dontbescaredhomie11 (talk • contribs) 22:59, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A Dobos torte for you!

bojo1498 talk has given you a Dobos Torte to enjoy! Seven layers of fun because you deserve it.


To give a Dobos Torte and spread the WikiLove, just place {{subst:Dobos Torte}} on someone else's talkpage, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

Welcome to STiki!

Hello, DemocraticLuntz, and welcome to STiki! Thank you for your recent contributions using our tool. We at STiki hope you like using the tool and decide to continue using it in the future. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Here are some pages which are a little more fun:

  • The STiki leaderboard - See how you are faring against other STiki users!
  • Userboxes - Do not hesitate to wear the STiki label with pride by choosing from a selection of userboxes!

We hope you enjoy maintaining Wikipedia with STiki! If you have any questions, problems, or suggestions don't hesitate to drop a note over at the STiki talk page and we'll be more than happy to help. Again, welcome, and thanks! West.andrew.g (developer) and Pratyya (Hello!) 06:31, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Supernatural Meg

Could I add it under the "fandom and popular culture" section with a better reference? --84.169.215.36 (talk) 20:04, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I believe so, but I'd check the talk page first. DemocraticLuntz (talk) 20:56, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

American Poetry

I will be editing a bit more for grammar (one should not start a paragraph with the word This) and to add other poetic narratives. Toodle007.Toodle007 (talk) 21:22, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations!

The Anti-Vandalism + STiki Barnstar

Congratulations, DemocraticLuntz! You're receiving this barnstar because you recently crossed the 1,000 classification threshold using STiki. We thank you both for your contributions to Wikipedia at-large and your use of the tool. We hope you continue your ascent up the leaderboard and stay in touch at the talk page. Thank you and keep up the good work! West.andrew.g (developer) and   Tentinator   09:22, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Help Improving the Section about the Duck Dynasty Controversy

Hello, would you help me improve the accuracy of the Duck Dynasty Controversy section [1]? The characterization of Phil Robinson's comments as anti-gay is problematic because he commented on behavior, not on a person who might describe himself or herself as a "homosexual." Mr. Robinson simply described homosexual behavior as sinful (which is objectively the traditional Christian, Judaic, and Islamic viewpoint). He said, "everything is blurred on what’s right and what’s wrong... Sin becomes fine ... Start with homosexual behavior and just morph out from there" [2].Perusteltu (talk) 04:21, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps describe them as "comments about 'homosexual behavior.'" DemocraticLuntz (talk) 04:35, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you; that sounds like a great start. How does the following proposed improvement sound?
: A&E Television's "Duck Dynasty" star Phil Robertson made headlines in December 2013 for his comments about homosexual behavior in a GQ interview. Robertson said, "Everything is blurred on what’s right and what’s wrong. Sin becomes fine." He gave this example, "Start with homosexual behavior and just morph out from there" [3]. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Perusteltu (talk • contribs) 04:45, 24 December 2013 (UTC) Perusteltu (talk) 05:09, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

controlled vs heard - mitm attack

I disagree with your edit on the MITM page. There are three parties to the conversation. The verb 'to control' implies that the MITM controls what the other two parties do or say. This is emphatically *not* the case and may lead to mistaken analysis. Perhaps 'influence' would be a happier medium.

69.60.245.199 (talk) 05:39, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I think influence would indeed be a happier medium. My issue with 'heard' was that a MITM attack may be active, while 'heard' seems to imply passive. Thanks. DemocraticLuntz (talk) 15:24, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Soucouyant

I've posted on the talk pages of Vampire and Category:Vampires before to support my removal of the Soucouyant from that category. The "Hag" category was ill-chosen. May I suggest we could use Category:Witchcraft_in_fairy_tales instead, which seems to be the seminal category of the Hag? I really do not think this creature is anything like a vampire, as it does not match the factors ascribed to vampires in the Vampire article. The Vampires category currently contains numerous creatures which are directly contradictory to the description in the Vampire article. -- Ciaraleone (talk) 11:09, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That sounds fair. DemocraticLuntz (talk) 15:25, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

cannabis smoking

The changes that I made to the article where true and not vandalism the image of a joint was one being rolled with a filter roaches are seldom rolled into a joint with regular pot but rather into roach joints with many roaches. A joint also contains 1 gram of marijuana and not 250-750 mg. This is first hand information from a former user/dealer. (as I have since stopped all contact with the creminal activities.) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Reikano1 (talk • contribs) 00:00, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Article ECHR

Hello, I have realized that you have reverted 4 of my edits. Can you please explain why? Why did you delete Belgium from the list? 80.10.161.203 (talk) 05:22, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you would like to confirm that the information is right please visit the official ECHR site to prove it. 80.10.161.203 (talk) 05:29, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I think I hit the wrong button accidentally in STiki. Sorry. DemocraticLuntz (talk) 15:02, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

THanks

Thank you for your civil resolution of the introduction of the Muslim Brotherhood article. --112.210.36.131 (talk) 21:39, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  1. ^ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A%2BE_Networks#Duck_Dynasty_Controversy
  2. ^ http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2013/12/23/duck-dynasty-patriarch-phil-robertson-says-will-not-give-after-homosexuality
  3. ^ http://www.gq.com/entertainment/television/201401/duck-dynasty-phil-robertson?currentPage=2
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:DemocraticLuntz&oldid=587669495"