User talk:DemocraticLuntz

Credentials re:Thanks!!!!!

thank you for keeping wikipedia safe! Khus2001 (talk) 14:55, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	Thank you for all the great work you are doing regarding demographics for Tennessee articles! :) SarahStierch (talk) 23:36, 17 December 2013 (UTC)

Soucouyant

I've posted on the talk pages of Vampire and Category:Vampires before to support my removal of the Soucouyant from that category. The "Hag" category was ill-chosen. May I suggest we could use Category:Witchcraft_in_fairy_tales instead, which seems to be the seminal category of the Hag? I really do not think this creature is anything like a vampire, as it does not match the factors ascribed to vampires in the Vampire article. The Vampires category currently contains numerous creatures which are directly contradictory to the description in the Vampire article. -- Ciaraleone (talk) 11:09, 24 December 2013 (UTC)

That sounds fair. DemocraticLuntz (talk) 15:25, 24 December 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I have realized that you have reverted 4 of my edits. Can you please explain why? Why did you delete Belgium from the list? 80.10.161.203 (talk) 05:22, 25 December 2013 (UTC)

If you would like to confirm that the information is right please visit the official ECHR site to prove it. 80.10.161.203 (talk) 05:29, 25 December 2013 (UTC)

I think I hit the wrong button accidentally in STiki. Sorry. DemocraticLuntz (talk) 15:02, 25 December 2013 (UTC)

Ok. No problem! (i am editing from another IP as I am currently not at my house). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.142.34.154 (talk) 15:03, 28 December 2013 (UTC)

Congratulations!

		The Bronze STiki Barnstar of Merit
		Congratulations, DemocraticLuntz! You're receiving this barnstar of merit because you recently crossed the 5,000 classification threshold using STiki. We thank you both for your contributions to Wikipedia at-large and your use of the tool. We hope you continue your ascent up the leaderboard and stay in touch at the talk page. Thank you and keep up the good work! West.andrew.g (developer) and   Tentinator   07:41, 26 December 2013 (UTC)

A pie for you!

Thank you for keeping wikipedia safe! Khus2001 (talk) 14:54, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

Why did you delete my changes?

I had recently changed the page of orange. Every thing waS OK.

(

Khus2001 (talk) 15:02, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

A cup of coffee for you!

YOU MUST BE REALLY TIRED. GO HAVE A CUP OF COFFEE! ) :) :) ;) Khus2001 (talk) 15:03, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

Paying attention to ambiguities.

In regard to: https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:178.50.80.217&redirect=no — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bene-210666-dict (talk • contribs) 16:48, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

The ambiguity subject: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Atta_in_airport.jpg

The ambuigity itself: Double time and date stamp on CCTV

It is obvious and clear that there are two time and date stamps on the CCTV image. For such, I don't believe there are any references needed. However, special attention to a face value anomaly a such is deserved. You do not mention it in your articles. As such, a reference addressing the consequences of this observation is called for. You may add references that further discuss this observation to your liking. If not I can do this for you or someone else. Best regards, Ben — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bene-210666-dict (talk • contribs) 16:46, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

Note: my change adding notice about the double timestamp on Mohammed Atta's CCTV capture in 'Portland' & the deletion of my added notice by the original writer: The writer makes no mention about the double time and date stamped CCTV image. There are NO double timestamps possible on ANY video footage - there is only ONE SMTP code on a video signal. Al the rest is fairytale. Be grateful I provide you this information. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.50.87.209 (talk) 20:40, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

Regarding Religion in Denmark

Hi, you reverted the changes I made to this article, as you required a source. Since I have no source for this (as I am a Dane, and merely used common knowledge in my country), I have instead chosen to delete the entire paragraph (which was, originally, also without a source). As my original edit was clarification on a point made, if that clarification cannot be added, I feel it better to remove the entire paragraph, instead of giving false information or impression (as noted, this paragraph was also source-less). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Philipzeplin (talk • contribs) 20:11, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

Fair enough. However, there ought to be some source; for instance, if Denmark or some sort of non-governmental organization tallies/estimates the religious beliefs (or even how religious they are) of its citizens, you could add a caveat that despite the importance of Christmas in the lives of Danes, Danes are not particularly religious.

Hello, You have reverted my changes and mentioned no reliable source, what is the reliablity of your source that god is He and not she? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lalwani.sanjay (talk • contribs) 12:38, 31 December 2013 (UTC)

God being He or She

Hello DemocraticLuntz, you seem to revert my change which changed he to she in some religious pages. your arugment was no reliable source. Does that mean you have a reliable source that god is he ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lalwani.sanjay (talk • contribs) 12:42, 31 December 2013 (UTC)

No, it means those religions refer to their deity as male. Please don't do this in the future (except for a religion which refers to its deity as female, in which case by all means the change is acceptable). The actual nature of any deity is irrelevant to Wikipedia. DemocraticLuntz (talk) 12:44, 31 December 2013 (UTC)

Detox

I wanted to check with you about this revert to the Detox disambiguation page. I wasn't sure if you might have been reverting it because it looked like vandalism. The article was recently moved from Detox (drag queen) to Detox Icunt since that's his character's full name. hinnk (talk) 23:58, 31 December 2013 (UTC)

Yeah that's what happened. Feel free to un-revert it if you haven't already. DemocraticLuntz (talk) 00:48, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

Congratulations!

		The Silver STiki Barnstar of Merit
		Congratulations, DemocraticLuntz! You're receiving this barnstar of merit because you recently crossed the 10,000 classification threshold using STiki. We thank you both for your contributions to Wikipedia at-large and your use of the tool. We hope you continue your ascent up the leaderboard and stay in touch at the talk page. Thank you and keep up the good work! West.andrew.g (developer) and   Tentinator   08:41, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

you are NOT the world's police

I find your attitude disgusting and unfortunately all too typical of the so called American way. You have no right to meddle with and police other people's edits. I find your methods somewhat like an illegal spy.

You are NOT the world's police.... take a hike and take your "bot" with you

Tosser Keewipete (talk) 14:52, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

Uh what? DemocraticLuntz (talk) 15:11, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

Ashley Spurlin edit

Ashley Spurlin Bio on Top Shot page has no merit or references to use as a valid source. Leave it alone. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 162.205.150.75 (talk) 20:33, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

Admiral Locklear edit

I served with him for 2 years, and when I was on the Truxtun 2 of the JO's were his students at the Academy

His nickname IS Lockup. I don't know where that would be written down, but I didn't add it to be defamatory. He's fully aware people call him that