Jump to content

User talk:Jingiby

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Wingsk (talk | contribs) at 13:00, 5 January 2014. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Vandalism of Christianity

Hi. There is vandalism of the Christian articles done by you. Please do not try to make to describe all Macedonian Saints as Bulgarian. There is not place for bulgarian chauvinism in wikipedia. Wikipedia is not not a bulgarian propaganda book written by Bozidar Dimitrov. All the time you are posting some unreliable reference from bulgarian nationalist authors, which you have never read. You are just posting them because you find the word 'bulgarian' in them, taking it out of context. Tell me what is the purpose of putting the map of Bulgaria in the article of Saint Naum? Or why you start the article with translation on His name on bulgarian? You can not manipulate on wikipedia. Tell me only only one source where Saint Naum called himself 'bulgarian'? But you even changed his name in the wikipedia article! You do not know what is Holly, even you vandalize the Christianity!

If you continue with your vandalism on everything connected with Macedonian history, I will need to report you to the administration. Regards. Wingsk (talk) 13:00, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Aromanians

You support your opinion about Balkan people on a Sultan's firman? Is sultan ethnologist or sociologist?

If we accept (I say "if") sultan's firman as a sociology study(!), we should mention the following:

Vlachs are the today Romanians.

Aromanians is a different tribe far away from the Romanian lands, with a different ethnic backround, different origin and different customs. The only connection with the Vlachs (today's Romanians) is that their languages come from Latin (separated from latin laguage in different centuries and with individual differencies). In 1905 Romanian Foreign Policy and Propaganda tried to usurp Aromanians in order to extend their influence in Southern Balkans. After 2 decades of propaganda, money spended and pressoures to the Ottoman government (supported also by Austrungaria) for that scope, Ottoman Administration recognized the Aromanians, not as an individual nation, but as part of the Great Vlach (Romanian) nation and allowed them to have the Romanian school and church system.

So, this firman, is just a proof that Aromanians are connected with the Greeks, since Ottomans tried unsuccessfully, to put them under Romanian control, during the Macedonian struggle. Additionally I would like to mention that Aromanians declare to be Greeks in 99% percentage for the last two centuries (that we have data). And another thing: from the 18th century Aromanians used to consist Greco-Roman Associations in central Europe as immigrants, because the believed in common nationality.

According to the above, I correct the article. User:Pyraechmes Chrusts

Ask first, write next

Ural-Altaic race was redirected to the Turanid race. On the other hand, you at least need to read the article which you trying to change. According to article ..."Turanid race" that included the Uralic and Altaic speaking peoples more generally and this is a sourced information(source 4). And, Altaic Japanese've established Turanist organisations. You can look at Turanian Society to see it. Therefore, I can easily add the Japanese to See also part of the article and also I can add the ...or Ural-Altaic race to the article. Wikipedia is not ur blog! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.174.135.252 (talk) 09:28, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

December 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Bulgarian Millet may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • Greeks]]".<ref>Nationality on the Balkans. The case of the Macedonians, by F. A. K. Yasamee. (Balkans: A Mirror of the New World Order, Istanbul: EREN, 1995; pp. 121-132.</ref> In the [[

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 07:22, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Bulgarian Millet may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • и Възраждане, том 2, Георги Бакалов, TRUD Publishers, 2004, ISBN 9545284676, стр. 23. (Bg.)]</ref> During the late 18th century, the Enlightenment in Western Europe provided influence for the
  • Greeks]]".<ref>Nationality on the Balkans. The case of the Macedonians, by F. A. K. Yasamee. (Balkans: A Mirror of the New World Order, Istanbul: EREN, 1995; pp. 121-132.</ref> In the [[

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:17, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Millet (Ottoman Empire) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:19, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Pliska may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • For|the medieval battle|Battle of Pliska}}

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 05:59, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bulgarian Millet, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Serbian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:07, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Millet (Ottoman Empire)

I see that you have recently been involved in an edit war at Millet (Ottoman Empire). Please note that one is not exempt from the edit warring policy because one believes one 's edits are right, and that edit warring can lead to being blocked from editing. JamesBWatson (talk) 09:28, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

OK, then. I have asked for help on Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard. Thank you.Jingiby (talk) 12:29, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Since the IP editor has continued edit warring after being warned, I have blocked the IP address for 48 hours. JamesBWatson (talk) 14:33, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I hope, this was a wise decision. Jingiby (talk) 14:40, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Fortunately, this ip madness has been fixed. Thanks Jing.Alexikoua (talk) 21:24, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion open at WP:DRN

Please participate when you have time.-- — Keithbob • Talk • 19:10, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Mixture

Of course there were. The Romans practiced a lot of measure re-settlement. Actually Sarmatians were settled in Macedonia also, some of those "300, 000) (not doubt exaggerated figure by the Romans) Limigantes redistrubuted throughtout Moesia Inferior, Dacia Ripensis and Macedonia; there were also "Goths", possibly Cumans (-> Cumanovo), and even a group of Magyars ! There were Kuvars people also. Don't think there were any Pechenges, they all went to NE Bulgaria and around Belgrade. (see Curta). Unfortunately , there were no Celts. They raided, but not settled in Macedonia. They settled around Belgrade (Scrodisci) and Bulgaria (Tylis, etc) Slovenski Volk (talk) 23:44, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

For now, I have amended it slightly to what we have references for. If you can find references for Kumans that would be great ! I couldnt find it in Curta's paper. Slovenski Volk (talk) 00:28, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The Historical dictionary of Republic of Macedonia mentiones Pechenegs' as Turkic settlers in Byzantine Macedonia, together with Kumans and Vardariots during 11-12th century. However, Curta wrote: It has been noted that the earliest Pecheneg raids into the Balkans shifted from west (1027) to east (1036), in order to spare provinces that had been attacked in previous years. The reason for this shift in raiding appears to be that the regions of western Bulgaria, Serbia, and Macedonia were less fortifed. Jingiby (talk) 16:22, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hi I replied on my TP Slovenski Volk (talk) 02:30, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, and as for the Pechenegs - yes they raided Macedonia, but they were not settled there. Only around Belgrade and NE Bulgaria. Raiding is different from settlement. The aim of raiding is raping and pillaging. Settlement was only ever done with Roman permission - federates or defeated, pacified and Christianized/ Romanizsed enemies - eg Getae, Sarmatians, Carpi, etc were all defeated groups, not groups which forced their way in. Becuase a raiding group can go all the way to Greece, camp the winter there, but ultimately can never settle becuase the Romans would always eventually 'catch up with them'. Even with the Slavs/ Avars, the emerging evidence suggests that, yes they raided, but did not settle till later. it appears that the Byzantines tactically withdrew much of the population of the Balkans further south. Then the Slavs settled (? were allowed to settle) by Phocas or Heraclius. The problem is the sources are silent on this matter, becuase the Byzantine historians of the 8th/ 9th century disliked those Emperors. Slovenski Volk (talk) 08:26, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Macedonians (ethnic group), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Byzantines (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

@Rv. Not an improvement.

By improvement it hasn't meant only rewording, but also putting stats, references and general description. Do you understand now what I've meant? Don't go into verbal war with me. Have a nice day. AirWolf (talk) 14:56, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I have written this in affect. Thought you've meant my edits. Bye.
Don't worry. However my edits didn'n change nothing you have edited. Jingiby (talk) 14:59, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Jingiby&oldid=589284526"