Jump to content

Talk:Convergence of accounting standards

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Well-rested (talk | contribs) at 16:50, 12 January 2014 (nominating for GA). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconBusiness: Accounting C‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
CThis article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Accounting task force.

Additional references

Adding some extra references for additions. I may have added a few of these already. -Well-restedTalk 08:38, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Overviews

News

Recent work

Arguments against

Misc sites

Misc news

US has possibly given up on convergence

I'm not a wiki editor so I don't know exactly how I would format a correction the article, or even if my source is reputable enough to correct it. But according to the CPA Journal FASB is no longer endorsing convergence, instead they think a viable alternative is condorsement.

http://www.nysscpa.org/cpajournal/toc2012.htm

If you click on the October 2012 issue you'll find an article on page 62-67 that discusses America's decision to head away from convergence. I think it's a pretty good source, but again I'm not really sure how to format any correction, so I thought I would put the information here for more experienced editors to use. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.203.166.30 (talk) 07:21, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]