Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Memebot

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Alexthegreater (talk | contribs) at 03:01, 17 June 2006. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

dicdef, neologism, nn. Delete. KleenupKrew 22:34, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per WP:NEO. Stifle (talk) 21:59, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Dumb, dumb idea! MEME itself is a neologism. To delete this article on the basis of neologism policy is just obscenely stupid. I'm certain secondary sources could be found that mention the word Memebot. It's a widespread memetical concept.
    -Ormuz Bey —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 200.138.33.29 (talkcontribs) .
  • maybe put an entry in wiktionary, then link all existing references to the wiktionary article for clarifcation. otherwise how are all the new members of alt.satanism going to get up to speed? it is a *regularly used term in memetics*. or we should just ditch wikipedia entries on 'meme' and 'memetics' itself (i agree, neologism argument invalid) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 66.57.13.147 (talkcontribs) .
  • Keep it -- I found it valuable to have this entry here and linked through memetic engineering. It describes a great term for a great concept. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.46.5.164 (talkcontribs) .


 AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
 Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Deathphoenix ʕ 13:56, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]