Jump to content

User talk:66.225.160.9

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by MatthewVanitas (talk | contribs) at 15:25, 15 January 2014 (Comment on draft: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Welcome to Wikipedia!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see:

You are welcome to continue editing without logging in, but you may want to consider creating an account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits such as the ability to create articles. For a full outline and explanation of the benefits that come with creating an account, please see this page. If you edit without a username, your IP address (66.225.160.9) is used to identify you instead.

In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on this page. Again, welcome!

January 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Canadian American Transportation Systems may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • 9426857 bloomberg businessweek: "Company Overview of Canadian American Transportation Systems LLC"]</ref>

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:37, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sudden spate of edits in January 2014

Hi, I've noticed from your contributions page that, after a long inactive period, you made 100+ edits in three days. Are you aware that there are rules about use of reliable sources and neutral point of view, especially when making changes to biographies of living persons? I'm thinking for example about your edits to Lisa_Raitt, where you change to say Raitt was made minister "because a CP line runs straight through her riding", to say that the Auditor General report was "scathing", to say that Jazz service was discontinued "under a legal cloud", to say that TPA issued a review that was "partisan", and so on. Peter Gulutzan (talk) 19:22, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: William Sharp McKechnie (January 15)

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

Comment on draft

Hello, 66.225.160.9. You have new messages at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/William Sharp McKechnie.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.