Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Jones (Access Software)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:11, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Chris Jones (Access Software)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No great claim of notability. Perhaps redirect to Indie Built. Bazonka (talk) 19:56, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 02:23, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:23, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:23, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, buff bills 7701 00:09, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: The article definitely needs work, but as both the lead designer and the face of the Tex Murphy games, he should meet WP:CREATIVE. And aside from various gaming sources, it seems he's been featured in mainstream newspaper coverage as well: [1][2]. ISTR Under a Killing Moon making a fairly big splash back in the day, so it should be possible to find sources from that time as well, like this Compute! article. Kolbasz (talk) 19:33, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Northamerica1000^(talk) 02:36, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.