User talk:A Gounaris

Welcome!

Hello, A Gounaris, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! --Vejvančický (talk / contribs) 16:43, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia"

Hi. Regarding your recent edits to the Balkans article, it was decided some time ago that the name "Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia" (or the abbreviation "FYROM") should not be used in general mentions of the modern Republic of Macedonia. See WP:MOSMAC. If you believe the specific situation at issue requires more clarification, feel free to discuss the issue at Talk:Balkans; however, edit warring — including trying to reimpose this edit without a true consensus for making it (or in defiance of a clear consensus not to make such a change) — will not be tolerated and is likely to get you blocked from editing. See also WP:ARBMAC, a decision by the Arbitration Committee imposing special scrutiny on articles relating to the Balkans. In order that there will be no uncertainty as to whether you have been properly warned of this situation, I am including a standard warning notice below.

The Arbitration Committee has permitted administrators to impose discretionary sanctions (information on which is at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions) on any editor who is active on pages broadly related to the Balkans. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, satisfy any standard of behavior, or follow any normal editorial process. If you continue to misconduct yourself on pages relating to this topic, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or an article ban. The Committee's full decision can be read at the "Final decision" section of the decision page.

Please familiarise yourself with the information page at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions, with the appropriate sections of Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Procedures, and with the case decision page before making any further edits to the pages in question. This notice is given by an uninvolved administrator and will be logged on the case decision, pursuant to the conditions of the Arbitration Committee's discretionary sanctions system.

— Rich wales (no relation to Jimbo) 15:52, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

January 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Doukas may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

{about||the 15th-century historian|Doukas (historian)|the French composer see [[Paul Dukas}}

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 02:14, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Doukas, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ottoman (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Hallo A.Gounaris. I wonder why this addition [[1]] is needed in the head of the article. I'm afraid that without a specific policy pointing to this, it isn't really needed.Alexikoua (talk) 19:03, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Not to forget the most important... Welcome to Wikipedia! In case you need any piece of advice just let me know. And don't forget to add the necessary references in your addition as you well did in the Despotate of Epirus. Well done. Alexikoua (talk) 16:31, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Thomas I Komnenos Doukas, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Latinized (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

February 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Paul Dukas may have broken the syntax by modifying 4 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:34, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Doukas article scope

Hello! To clarify this, there is indeed a restriction on pre-12th century members, because this is the usage of the sources used in the article; in the ODB, the EHW, Cheynet and every single specialist work dealing with the family there is a clear distinction made between the Doukas clan of the 9th-11th centuries and the later bearers of the name, often unrelated to the former. The one thing that must be avoided is lumping the Komnenodoukai. the Vatatzes-Doukai etc. with the earlier Doukai together as if they were all part of the same family, because they were not. The article is not meant to be an index of every person who ever bore the surname "Doukas", but to focus chiefly on the middle Byzantine family. The inclusion of the later evolution in the name's usage, and some examples of people who bore it, are unavoidable, but the scope itself is limited. Constantine ✍ 14:27, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Thessaloniki (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Albanian and Turkish

Shelley Berkley (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Ottoman

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Paul Dukas surname debate

I contributed edits on Paul Dukas' family background and suggested - without any references or evidence to back it up - that his father Jules Dukas may have had a Greek Jew descendant originally from Ottoman-era Greek Macedonia. I thought Ottoman-Greek Jews might have adopted the name Dukas/Doukas under the INFLUENCE of their Greek-speaking Christian Orthodox neighbours. This MIGHT explain why there were and still are other Jewish families in Britain, France and Austria-Hungary who bear the name Doukas/Dukas, since many Jews from Ottoman-era Greek Macedonia are known to have immigrated to these countries. But this idea is really only an interesting line of inquiry and not historical fact.

It is important to emphasize that even among most of those Greek-speaking Christian Orthodox families from Epirus, Greek Macedonia and elsewhere in northern Greece - where the late Byzantine Doukai and Komneno-Doukai were most active - who have Doukas/Dukas as a surname (or additional surname) VERY FEW of these will even claim descent from the Byzantine-era noble family. Most of those especially northern Greek families who have the name Doukas/Dukas in the final or middle position do so simply because an earlier ancestor probably adopted it for prestige reasons. Modern Greece has not maintained a living aristocratic tradition, not just because the end of the 1967-74 military dictatorship led to the deposition of the Greek monarchy (which in any case was not indigenous to Greece) but because Byzantine Greek aristocrats in the Ottoman period tended to marry into the Ottoman ruling family or the noble families of Christian Orthodox Russia and elsewhere in Europe. Hope this helps those interested in the name Dukas/Doukas. Thanks.