This user is taking a wikibreak and may be away or inactive for varying periods of time.
Although he may occasionally be able to do some editing, messages left for him may not be replied to for a while.
He will be back on Wikipedia when college is over.
Hello, Tbhotch! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! fetchcomms04:09, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. You have a new message at Epicgenius's talk page.
regarding numbers of losses in Wikipedia article "Battle_of_Narva_(1944)"
on the talk page of the article I have put my comment as follows (judging the talks there I was not the first who called the numbers to question):
//I tried several times to edit the section on losses. Odd numbers are taken from some authors who are expressively biased against the Soviet Union (no need to talk of Mart Laar - you can take a peep at Wikipedia on him, what concerns Ian Baxter - I couldn't locate his profile on Internet at all). Why is the view on losses so one-sided? I gave references to alternative numbers:
however, there are other quite-reverse numbers in Russian-language Wiki: Soviet losses - 4685 dead or missing with 18602 wounded or sick [1][2]
but was blamed of vandalism and banned from making entries. How can one change contents of the article without the wish of the one who has created it? If a politically prejudged person creates some article in Wiki who can override his questionable ideas?
Through his numbers the author managed to made this battle one of the bloodiest battles in the whole human history! Isn't too much, especially if we refer to the Soviet more-or-less documented numbers (in 1944 all the soviet losses were yet pretty accurately recorded).//
Could you please pay attention to this, as the article could distort the objective picture of the world history? - through the numbers in the article, the battle was included in the bloodies battles of all times - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_battles_by_casualties
61st Oscars
Hi there,
I wanted to ask you if you find this piece of information added by User:Korny O'Near acceptable for inclusion for the 61st Oscars. I am wondering if it sounds too gossipy or sensationalistic for a featured list.
Bowman herself has claimed that she was made to sign a gag order the next day prohibiting her from speaking to the press about her performance for the next 13 years. She finally spoke about it publicly in a 2013 interview, in which she described the performance as looking "like a gay bar mitzvah".
Hi, can you please take care of the page Counting Stars (song)? I did edited the genre with reliable source.
If User:Y2kcrazyjoker4 undo my edits with unexplained removal of a reference, just revert it back.
Y2kcrazyjoker4 says article's description doesn't mean it is folk, it says the band's attempt at it, so he/she revert to as definitely pop rock genre as usual. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 183.171.178.189 (talk • contribs)
Hello, Some vandalist removed all mentions of FLO RIDA song for charity BOOTY ON THE FLOOR he did with Marc Mysterio. Can this edit be reverted as it was highly publicized and well sourced.
Can you please go back to a previous version of FLO RIDA page from august 2013 and re-add these well sourced info on the song and release?
Can you figure it out for the album genre? If genre is unsourced remove it. Thanks.
And take care of the page.
66th Oscars (1994)
Hi Tbotch,
I hope you had a great Christmas season and best wishes for the new years. I do not know if you have new classes or such, but I was wondering if you could proofread 66th Academy Awards for featured list status. I would certainly appreciate the help.
Okay I didn't notice who had opened that RM, sorry for that. But I do not know what the problem is - if someone asks you 3 or 4 times and you refuse to tell them, then? In ictu oculi (talk) 00:16, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, Tbhotch, I can't edit because of semi-protection, help me check if there's an unsourced genre. According to Allmusic[1] he is a pop vocalist, which means the genre is pop.
Hi Axel, sorry I undid this, the message didn't look right for where it was applied. What was the goal there? There might be a template needed there but not that one, can we find the right one? Zad6813:39, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine - move?
You have recently returned the article name to the old name (i.e. without the word (book)) and wrote:"Tbhotch moved page The Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine (book) to The Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine over redirect: No other article titled like this. The page still redirecting here. Use RM instead"
This is the first time for me to encounter an editor who reply with hieroglyphs. You are not replying but rather write a collection of unrelated words. What is your problem? why can't you express yourself? Ykantor (talk) 19:32, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, Tbhotch, I can't edit because of semi-protection, help me check if there's an unsourced genre in infobox. According to Allmusic[2] he is a pop vocalist, which means the genre is pop. His fellow boyband Take That is also pop.
Are you sure Tevez's full name is "Carlos Alberto Martinez Tevez"? It would make sense for that to be the case, but I've never seen a source with that fact. Any chance you could provide one? – PeeJay20:06, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
It's an unambiguous NFCC violation: reverting its inclusion is exempted under WP:EW. Please stop forcing the image in: that isn't exempt.—Kww(talk) 22:41, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Precisely: there's no question whatsoever. None. It doesn't meet any established criteria under WP:NFCC, and all you have done is interfered with an clear-cut administrative action.—Kww(talk) 22:46, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
--Birdienest81 (talk) 23:55, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
Need your help
Hello Tbhotch,
While I have contacted an editor about this previously, I really donot know how soon I'd get a response since editor's history shows that last contribution was in 2010, that's why I decided to bring the matter to you. An article I created about this mixtape which has significant independent coverage in reliable sources was redirected by an editor while I was blocked. In the edit summary editor states that it fails WP:NALBUMS meanwhile there were references from media newspapers which I provided along with a review. Please I'd appreciate it if you can kindly look into this, I want to know what you think. Thanks. Stanleytux (talk) 23:14, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
