Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Operation Chameleon '92

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WP:SOFTDELETE. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 13:43, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Operation Chameleon '92

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of any real notability within the context of the Siege of Sarajevo and the Bosnian War. There aren't any real results for Operation Chameleon '92 on Google Books, which leads me to believe that a deletion (or merger with Siege of Sarajevo) is best. 23 editor (talk) 22:49, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Yugoslavia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:33, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bosnia and Herzegovina-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:34, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Serbia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:34, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:34, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:34, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mkdw ^talk 03:38, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I don't see anything in this article that isn't already covered by Siege of Sarajevo and that's clearly the superior article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jorgath (talk • contribs) 17:07, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.