User talk:64.12.116.7

This IP address was that of an AOL web proxy which now sends X-Forwarded-For headers to the Wikimedia Foundation. No further edits should originate from this IP address. For more information, please see Wikipedia:AOL.
If you are an AOL user editing from this IP address, please email an administrator to have the problem corrected. Note that this IP address has been indefinitely blocked, so you will not be able to edit from this address.

Your recent edit to Bay Currents was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept our apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot2 19:15, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to Bay Currents, are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the hard work of others. Thanks. No one cares what you did to Alexis. Mr. Lefty 19:21, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Home front during World War II

Your recent edit to Home front during World War II was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot2 23:26, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

St. Xavier High School

St. X students often talk about their alma mater having been "stolen" from St. Ignatius, but even so, that's not appropriate for an encyclopedia article about the school, unless you can word it professionally and back such a claim up with a reliable source, such as a newspaper or book – there's actually a rather lengthy book on the history of St. X, so if you could dig that up, it'd provide some interesting information. The line "Stolen from St. Ignatius High School" has been removed from the article more than once, and the reinsertion of that line is considered vandalism, grounds for being blocked from editing Wikipedia. Please consider this advice when editing in the future. Thanks. – Minh Nguyễn (talk, contribs) 07:24, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Bay Currents

Your recent edit to Bay Currents was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot2 02:11, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please

thanks for your lovely commeny on Bay Currents--know that it is a FREE newspaper and it'a nearly impossible for it to go out of business-- Almost Famous 07:52, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for experimenting with the page Coal on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. DakPow e rs (Talk) 16:21, 21 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

23 May 2006

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Three Gorges Dam, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. NawlinWiki 18:50, 23 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked
You have been blocked for vandalism for 24 hours. To contest this block, add the text {{unblock}} on this page, along with an explanation of why you believe this block to be unjustified. You can also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list. Please be sure to include your username (if you have one) and IP address in your email.

Please do not erase warnings on this page. Doing so is also considered vandalism.

-- Longhair 14:02, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism June 2006

Your recent edit to The King George School was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot2 14:29, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You have recieved this warning because you recently vandalised a page in a particularly severe manner, and you are being asked to stop. If you choose to continue vandalising pages, you may be blocked from editing without further warning.

--digital_m e^(t/c) 22:06, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edit to Thujone was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot2 21:38, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for experimenting with the page Kirk Fogg on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. SomeStranger^(t|c) 03:34, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Kirk Fogg. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. SomeStranger^(t|c) 03:41, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Raymond Leo Burke

If you have problems with the article, please let us know what the problems are rather than just removing large parts of the article. That can (and will) be considered vandalism.

Your edit to Bill Gates

Your recent edit to Bill Gates was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot2 03:10, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Blaise Pascal, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. hoopydink^{Conas tá tú?} 02:13, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to [[:{{{1}}}]], you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Geoffrey Gibson 21:54, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for experimenting with the page Luxembourg on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. frymaster 21:55, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Politics of Italy

Your recent edit to Politics of Italy was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot2 16:13, 20 June 2006 (UTC) [reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

64.12.116.7 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

2 acts of vandalism in 48 hours?? do you have any idea how good a record that is for an AOL user?

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=2 acts of vandalism in 48 hours?? do you have any idea how good a record that is for an AOL user? |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=2 acts of vandalism in 48 hours?? do you have any idea how good a record that is for an AOL user? |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=2 acts of vandalism in 48 hours?? do you have any idea how good a record that is for an AOL user? |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Removing warnings

Template:Wr0

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.