Jump to content

User talk:Krimuk2.0

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by AvNiElNi-nA (talk | contribs) at 06:45, 23 March 2014 (Reverted 1 edit by Krimuk90 (talk) to last revision by AvNiElNi-nA. (TW)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.


"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe." — Albert Einstein

Archives

Needed your opinion

Hey Smaro! I needed your opinion. On Kapoor's article, it currently mentions that JWM established her as a leading actress of Bollywood, but I came across sources that state that it was back in 2001 that she became a leading actress (primarily due to the success of MKKH and K3G, as well as her performance in Asoka) here, here, here, here and here. Do you think we should change it? If we do, we'll have to re-write the lead as well. This is what I have come up with so far. -- Bollywood Dreamz talk 19:14, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I agree with you. The re-write is very good and I think it will be fair to change it. :) --krimuk 90 04:04, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for work on Aamir Khan so far! Would love to collaborate with you on that one. :) BTW, I don't think it makes sense to have the "production and direction" section since most if not all the films have featured Khan in them. We can incorporate it into his career section and also state that he produced it, etc. -- Bollywood Dreamz talk 21:19, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I completely agree bud! At this point, it's going to be extremely tough to find sources for Khan's old films, but I'll try my best. BTW, I thought a consensus was already reached for adding films in production to an actor's filmography. What's all this fuss about now? -- Bollywood Dreamz talk 01:49, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hey bud, please feel free to revert if you don't agree with my edits on Balan's article. I just thought it was helpful to have the years and remove the 09 image as it was making the career section look cluttered. -- Bollywood Dreamz talk 03:36, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Welcome to Koffee with Rahul! Haha. I can sure give KJo a run for his money. LOL
  1. Rank in order of acting talent: Deepika, Kareena, Katrina, Priyanka, Vidya (Kareena, Vidya, Priyanka, Deepika, Katrina)
  2. Rank in order of acting talent: Aamir, Hrithik, Ranbir, Salman, Shahrukh (Hrithik, Ranbir, Aamir, Shahrukh, Salman)
  3. The number one actor and actress today (Ranbir & Deepika)
  4. An over-rated actor and actress (Salman & Katrina)
  5. Who has a brighter future: Alia, Anushka, Parineeti, Shraddha, Sonakshi, Sonam (Parineeti & Alia)
  6. Who has a brighter future: Aditya, Arjun, Ranveer, Sidharth, Sushant, Varun (Ranveer)
  7. A film you think was over-rated (Chennai Express)
  8. A recent film that you saw that you liked/hated (Lootera & The Lunchbox; GTPM & Chennai Express)
  9. Vidya's best performance/film (Parineeta/Kahaani)
  10. Your top 5 favourite films within the past 10 years (2003-13) (The Lunchbox, Omkara, Taare Zameen Par, Barfi & Black) -- Bollywood Dreamz talk 04:51, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, my friend! Why don't you come up with some more questions? ;) I always used to play these games with Shahid. -- Bollywood Dreamz talk 05:04, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You're good! LOL :) For number 4/5, I know you asked for one, but it was too hard to choose. I've listed two! :P
  1. The one name that pops up in my mind: Preity Zinta
  2. Priyanka in Barfi!
  3. Ranveer in Lootera/GKRRL
  4. Mr. Bachchan - his entire filmography... LOL. But my personal favourites are Black, Paa & Agneepath; Aamir: Lagaan & DCH; SRK: MNIK & Devdas; Ranbir: Barfi; Hrithik: Lakshya & KMG; Ajay: Omkara & Zakhm
  5. Madhuri: Mrityudand & Pukar; Sridevi: Lamhe & Chaalbaaz; Rani: Black & Saathiya; Preity: Heaven on Earth & KHNH; Kareena: Omkara & Chameli; Priyanka: Barfi & Aitraaz
  6. Silsila: a similar film was already made (KANK) so I would retain the same cast; Mother India: some classics are better left untouched and I can't imagine anyone doing what Nargis did; Lamhe: Hrithik & Kareena; Arth: This is a definitely tough on. It would be interesting to see Vidya, Farhan & Priyanka; HAHK: Ranbir & Deepika
  7. Deepika, Katrina, Priyanka, Anushka & Sonam
  8. SRK & Salman
  9. It's been a while... but I would say Omkara
  10. Ajay Devgan/Akshaye Khanna & Urmila Matondkar
Now it's your turn to answer these questions! ;) -- Bollywood Dreamz talk 15:38, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Shukriya dost! :) -- Bollywood Dreamz talk 15:48, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Not yet... been really busy! What about you? I've been hearing good things about Queen! -- Bollywood Dreamz talk 01:12, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Congrats bud! :) BTW, who gave the better performance in Gulaab Gang? -- Bollywood Dreamz talk 01:30, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know if I have told you but I have a huge crush on Juhi... LOL :) BTW, I don't quite like the current pic used on Rani's article – she looks really tired. She looks much better in this or even this one. What are your thoughts? -- Bollywood Dreamz talk 17:31, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hoping to catch it this weekend! :) BTW are you good with removing watermarks from the Bollywood Hungama images? -- Bollywood Dreamz talk 19:19, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I ask myself this every time... LOL. She says that she wants to do good films, but then turns them down when she's offered them. Quite literally "a bundle of contradictions". BTW, I don't think she was offered Queen; it's probably a bunch of hogwash. I think Vikas Bahl has said that Kangana was his only choice. With Black, it was due to Mr. Bachchan; after Abhishek and Karisma broke off their engagement things weren't too good with the family. As for the rest, she was probably smoking something when those films were offered to her. LOL -- Bollywood Dreamz talk 15:15, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Shraddha Kapoor

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/entertainment/hindi/bollywood/news-interviews/Shraddha-Kapoor-bombarded-with-bday-wishes-on-Twitter/articleshow/31345533.cms I found this source is more accurate and reliable one to represent her date of birth. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 197.226.73.30 (talk) 15:39, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

accusations of "bad faith"

You have had bad faith all along. And you still have not provided any valid rationale for why we would break WP:V and WP:CRYSTAL to claim a release date for an unreleased film when we can easily and more accurately describe what is actually verifiable. Your resistance to accurately presenting the facts is completely incomprehensible to me. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 20:12, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have started numerous discussions, in talk pages, and the latest one being here. However, you have refused to even discuss this seriously, making a joke out of this entire situation and randomly reverting my edits. So please discuss there, before you go on your "bad faith" rampage again. -- KRIMUK90 ✉ 04:14, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Rani Mukerji filmography

I'd like to thank you for supporting the DYK project. Cheers Victuallers (talk) 00:02, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Grace of Monaco.png

⚠
⚠
 Thanks for uploading File:Grace of Monaco.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:43, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

final warning

This is your final warning. If you continue to misrepresent sources as you did with [1] and [2] and [3] you will be blocked. The consensus is that we must accurately represent the sources. changing content to misrepresent the sources is unacceptable and will lead to you getting blocked. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 09:55, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I think you need to brush up on your English language skills if you cannot fathom what the result of the discussion was. -- KRIMUK90 ✉ 09:57, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

আরে দাদা তুমিই তো প্রেরণা। I learn a lot from studying your edits. —Soham (talk) 17:49, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Haha yes Krimuk, you really have prodigious editing skills. —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 18:01, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Awww... *blushes* You guys are too kind. -- KRIMUK90 ✉ 18:05, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • I have a rusty bengali too wink, I think you may be in your 20s, therefore older than me by 5 or more than 5 years. দাদা'ই হচ্ছ তো নাকি? —Soham (talk) 18:03, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Soham did not understand the last part though, Bengali is not my mother tongue anyways, i hear it from my dear friends though :) —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 18:06, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • দাদা'ই হচ্ছ তো নাকি translates to (figuratively)— So technically you're like an older brother to me. There you go. As for TRPoD's case I will comment on it after I do a bit background research. AAMOF I was studying this article when I received Krimuk's notification. O, and Krimuk, you are 8 years older than me. —Soham (talk) 18:12, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Yup. —Soham (talk) 18:20, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Okay well then I'm somewhere in between you guys, guess guess :P —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 18:35, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Umm....I would say, maybe 20. -- KRIMUK90 ✉ 18:37, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
And the winner is..... Sooooohaaaammmmmmmmmm... *confetti* —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 18:41, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
A big, fat Bollywood-esque "Nahiiiiiiiiiiiii............. Yeh nahi ho sakta" :( -- KRIMUK90 ✉ 18:43, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
"Yeh ho sakta hai, ye ho chuka hai"
LOL guys. I am pursuing my higher studies but am still vella! -- KRIMUK90 ✉ 18:50, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hmm... so two velle's edit Wikipedia. Earlier I thought geeks edit WP. —Soham (talk) 18:55, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Well, we are the vella geeks, that's the hottest new thing! :P Btw, this conversation has inspired me enough to listen to the vella song from SOTY! -- KRIMUK90 ✉ 18:58, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The video for the song is good, some Hollywood-esque film-making techniques were used. Yeah I guess being a "vella geek" is the new cool. —Soham (talk) 19:00, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Goodnight and bye guys, I am dozing off, can't edit with closed eyes. —Soham (talk) 19:01, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
LOL, I must be being such a bad influence on you. ভালো করে পড়াশোনা কর. Good night. :) -- KRIMUK90 ✉ 19:03, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Afternoon all, lol had a early morning shoot so no time to edit. —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 08:55, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
‘Shoot’, are you an actor or something? —Soham (talk) 10:09, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
No Sohan, I do part time modelling. —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 12:19, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oh I see, what else will you do with a stature of 6 ft 2? BTW I am 5'10. —Soham (talk) 13:54, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Whoa, you are a model! We need to start a Wiki article on you soon... -- KRIMUK90 ✉ 03:29, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
OMG lol, you guys are too much! —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 08:41, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Haha. But seriously, good luck with your career. :) -- KRIMUK90 ✉ 09:27, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Second that. —Soham (talk) 12:32, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thank you for the barnstar, mate! :-) This is the first time I've actually heard about DYK..I'm such a Wiki noob :P So, basically do I just write an interesting fact about her and nominate it? AB01 I'M A POTATO 11:15, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, nice! Is there a time limit of when to nominate? Or can we do it whenever? AB01 I'M A POTATO 11:23, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Wait, I think it says 5 days..I might do the nom tomorrow or day after..get some time t think about it. I agree tho- she is very talented and hugely underrated! Yeah, and maybe we could work on her GA together if you have time. AB01 I'M A POTATO 11:30, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Yay, cool :-) Looking forward AB01 I'M A POTATO 11:06, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I see Rani Mukherji will be on the main page soon. Congratz! Btw, I did the DYK nomination for Kangana Ranaut AB01 I'M A POTATO 12:56, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Take your time...no rush :-) AB01 I'M A POTATO 06:51, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hey, I think the DYK nomination is invalid cos it hasn't been expanded fivefold.. :/ Eugghh..oh well! AB01 I'M A POTATO 03:11, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Yep, sure. Btw, did you watch Queen? AB01 I'M A POTATO 06:50, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
So lucky! Yes, I watched it online, Shittest quality though..everything was so dark. In the nightclub scenes, Kangana's eyes were glowing, bahaha. But, seriously a good movie...Kangana and Lisa were amazing! AB01 I'M A POTATO 06:57, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Aaahh!! Ikr!! The whole movie was good! Kangana was no doubt, THE STAR! I can't see anybody else in that role. And Lisa Haydon surprised me too. She nailed the French accent, BANG ON!! Unless there is better to come in terms of female performances, I really hope Kangana and Lisa don't get ignored at the award ceremonies this year :') AB01 I'M A POTATO 23:25, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Haha, looking forward to Revolver Rani too. Did not understand half of the trailer, but it seems like Kangana has a power-packed performance in this too.. AB01 I'M A POTATO 03:47, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Doubt that it's gonna be another Queen! Definitely! Being a flowerpot isn't fun in movies ;-) AB01 I'M A POTATO 21:47, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Yeh, there's a bit left to do on that page. I'm so ceebs finishing it off, but I should soon. I'm gonna write up a Personal Life and off-screen work section. Do you think an In the Media section is also needed? AB01 I'M A POTATO 08:51, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, yeh..wait. It does have that section. What have I been smoking?!? :D I meant I need to fix up that section, and add the Personal life and off screen work section AB01 I'M A POTATO 09:02, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

March 2014

Information icon Please remember to assume good faith when dealing with other editors. Comments like this [[4]] are not helpful. Please seek dispute resolution via WP:RFC, WP:DR or failing that WP:RFC/U Hell in a Bucket (talk) 20:38, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Main Page appearance: Rani Mukerji

This is a note to let the main editors of Rani Mukerji know that the article will be appearing as today's featured article on March 21, 2014. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. If you prefer that the article appear as TFA on a different date, or not at all, please ask Bencherlite (talk · contribs). You can view the TFA blurb at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/March 21, 2014. If it needs tweaking, or if it needs rewording to match improvements to the article between now and its main page appearance, please edit it, following the instructions at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests/instructions. The blurb as it stands now is below:

Rani Mukerji

Rani Mukerji (born 1978) is an Indian film actress. Through her successful Bollywood (Hindi film) acting career, she has become one of the most high-profile celebrities in India. Mukerji has received seven Filmfare Awards from fourteen nominations, and her film roles have been cited as a significant departure from the traditional portrayal of women in mainstream Hindi cinema. Mukerji began a full-time career in film in 1997 and had her first major success with the 1998 romance Kuch Kuch Hota Hai. In 2002 she was acclaimed for her role in the relationship drama Saathiya, and by the year 2004 she had established herself as a leading actress of Bollywood with roles in the romantic comedy Hum Tum and the dramas Yuva and Veer-Zaara. She achieved further success for her leading roles in Black (2005) and Kabhi Alvida Naa Kehna (2006). After starring in a series of unsuccessful films, she featured in the successful thrillers No One Killed Jessica (2011) and Talaash: The Answer Lies Within (2012). In addition to acting in films, Mukerji has been actively involved with several humanitarian causes and is vocal about issues faced by women and children. (Full article...)

UcuchaBot (talk) 23:02, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hey hey hey, there goes another one. Congratulations! BollyJeff | talk 23:14, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Yay!! Really happy. :) :) -- KRIMUK90 ✉ 01:04, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Wow, forgot to congrats you for this!!! PS, Rani's pic in the little box, ooh la la. —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 06:22, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you so much. :) Yup, she looks damn hot in that! If you see her pictures from 2009, she looked her best back then! -- KRIMUK90 ✉ 06:31, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I have seen her in person in one of the shows I was walking, she is sooooo tiny and cuddly. —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 06:50, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you Soham. :) And Indian Bio, you seem to be quite famous. I have met her too at her Durga Puja, when I used to stay in Mumbai. -- KRIMUK90 ✉ 06:55, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Well you are the more famous one since you have met her and I just saw her. —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 06:57, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
LOL, but I ain't no model. ;) -- KRIMUK90 ✉ 07:03, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Blocking/Banning TRPoD

I have tried having TRPoD blocked multiple times, but all my efforts have failed. I think u can report him this time, bcos I know u do not lose battles that easily. Is it fair to report him as edit warring? Bcos he is one man fighting with several other editors (albeit unarmed and unsupported), just like a Bollywood "hero", always going against consensus. Kailash29792 (talk) 13:59, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If he removes the year from any one of the disputed articles again, I will have no choice other than reporting him. He really has pissed off a lot of people, hasn't he?-- KRIMUK90 ✉ 15:04, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Academy Award for Best Actor

Then "fix" the other categories with no organization so there's some consistency. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rararawr21 (talk • contribs) 15:57, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If other articles are bad, doesn't mean this one will have to be bad too. -- KRIMUK90 ✉ 16:02, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
How is it disruptive editing or vandalism? It's not. There is no change in the information. I am just changing the format to match the other acting categories and make it easier to read.
That is highly subjective. As I said, build consensus on the talk page, and if others agree, I will revert myself. Thank you. -- KRIMUK90 ✉ 16:13, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Is there another editor that I can talk to about this issue that will help me resolve it without accusing me of vandalism? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rararawr21 (talk • contribs) 16:14, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Post on the talk page of the article please. Other users will respond when they can. And please, continue on the same thread here. -- KRIMUK90 ✉ 16:16, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
And edit summaries like "If it's not your article, then why do you care? I am not changing the info, just the format." are not helpful. Please read WP:OWNERSHIP. -- KRIMUK90 ✉ 16:17, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Annie Hall

Hi, can you review [5] for GA? If you can reserve it and review in a few days that's fine.♦ Dr. Blofeld 14:25, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, done. :) I love the film! -- KRIMUK90 ✉ 14:49, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I was about to open it but my health prevented me from doing so. I missed a Blo review. – Soham (talk) 15:21, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, I didn't know that you were interested in reviewing it. You can still post your own comments, of course. What happened to your health? -- KRIMUK90 ✉ 15:32, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Fever. – Soham (talk) 15:41, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Awww...get well soon. Are you giving your 10th boards this year? -- KRIMUK90 ✉ 15:59, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
2015. – Soham (talk) 16:07, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, okay. -- KRIMUK90 ✉ 16:08, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • (edit conflict) I see you're using the typographic substitute for "ndash" --. I suggest you use – by pressing Alt+0+1+5+0. – Soham (talk) 16:12, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I see. But I sign by pressing the "signature and timestamp" tab, and it inserts the ndash directly, so can't do much to change that. :) -- KRIMUK90 ✉ 16:16, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there,

I will be on spring break next week, and I will use the time to clean up the 86th Academy Awards ceremony list to make it better, comprehensive, and readable. However, I may need your help to prevent trolls and other unpleasant editors who might accuse me of vandalism or edit warring. I want to improve the list so I can eventually submit it for featured list consideration on July 25. I requested for a temporary page protection, but I am not sure if it will be granted. Your help would be greatly appreciated.

--Birdienest81 (talk) 23:35, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Don't worry, I'll keep an eye out. :) -- KRIMUK90 ✉ 02:29, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pinkvilla

Are you aware of any socks that were exhibiting similar editing behavior in the past? —Vensatry (Ping) 09:54, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I am not very sure. But I have a feeling by reading their edit summaries (and I may be wrong) that he/she isn't a newbie here. I have to see their future contributions to be more certain. -- KRIMUK90 ✉ 09:57, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
User:Vensatry he nailed it right on the head [[6]] Hell in a Bucket (talk) 17:42, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Protection request - List of actors who won the Academy, BAFTA, Golden Globe, SAG, and Critic's Choice Award for a single performance

Hi,

I am engaged in an edit war with another user on this page. I am hoping for an admin with some knowledge of cinema to protect the page and settle the debate (I emphatically believe I am in the right), or failing that, just someone to protect the page and end the edit war whilst I attempt to persuade the other user. I am not sure whether you are an admin but clearly you are a leading expert on cinema and I was hoping for your assistance in the discussion anyway.

Best Wishes

MasonBanks (talk) 23:27, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi MansonBanks, I am no admin. I do believe that you right and will keep an eye out on the page. Cheers! -- KRIMUK90 ✉ 02:16, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

HAPPY HOLI!!!!!!!!!!!=

—Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 07:25, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Although I strictly steer clear of this festival, I see no harm is wishing you "HAPPY HOLI!!!!". You won't see such a bland holy wish in a long time. wink – Soham (talk) 07:51, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Happy Holi guys! Have a blast! -- KRIMUK90 ✉ 07:58, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
[[7]] you nailed your first sock! Hell in a Bucket (talk) 17:39, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Yay! Thank you. :) -- KRIMUK90 ✉ 03:27, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Editor's Barnstar
Much obliged for your review of Ben-Hur. A trim was definitely needed! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 16:39, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Blofeld. You did a fabulous job on it. :) -- KRIMUK90 ✉ 01:52, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Varun Dhawan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Indian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:52, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Annie Hall

Can you please update the talkpage of Annie Hall? Bcos I do not want to mess up something I was not involved in. Kailash29792 (talk) 04:32, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Done -- KRIMUK90 ✉ 04:41, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Rani Mukerji

You did it! Congrats! The article is on the main page today. - Best


Why do you keep reverting all that without even seeing the changes? All I did was list the movies with awards. And arranged the pictures in a better way. Why don't you like it? It works better for the page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.48.206.18 (talk) 19:05, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You are a sock and will be blocked again! Please don't post here! -- KRIMUK90 ✉ 01:22, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not a sock. I don't have any other accounts. It's just me with my ID. Instead of just saying sockpuppetry, see the better arrangement of pictures and keep that. But no point if you just want to be unreasonable.

Great! Ba-bye! -- KRIMUK90 ✉ 01:25, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yolo

I was watching the Nargis-Freida episode again (boredom to the max!!) on Youtube and they have these speech-recognition subtitles that I turned on for some reason. Some of the translations were hilarious! Thought I'd share a few with you:
KEY (what they said --> what the subtitles translated this to)

  • Are you trying to say Yash Raj Films rejected you? --> Are you trying to say they injected you?
  • Please welcome the very beautiful Nargis Fakhri --> ....beautiful nagasaki
  • I would kill to see John and Ranbir hook up --> ....to see John and beer in a cup
  • Sheila ki jawani, Munni badnaam, Fevicol, Chikni chameli --> She like in Germany, but now I'm heavy, call a chick
  • Name the Kardashian (pronounced by Karan as Kardaashan :P) sisters --> Name the reproduction sisters
  • I was clearly making a pass at her --> I was clearly making a pot, yeah!!
  • You're just making her do this --> You're just making a dude
  • That's pretty good actually --> Her daughter now well a big butt
  • And I think Varun has exposed much more than you have --> And I think bar owners expose much more than US hair
  • I'm in conversation with Freida Pinto and Nargis Fakhri --> I've been gone fishin with....
  • I'm gonna take a broom --> That one Karan actually said :P AB01 I'M A POTATO 12:06, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hahaha, I lost my shit with the reproduction sisters. Not far from the truth, aye ;-) AB01 I'M A POTATO 13:07, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kangana Ranaut

Ranaut is born on 1986 not 1987 check her CINTAA profile --- AvNiElNi-nA (talk) 06:44, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Krimuk2.0&oldid=600841939"