Talk:Eugenia Smith

Eugenia Smith's article does NOT belong in the Holstein-Gottorp-Romanov catagory. She was not a member of this family, therefore does not belong there, unless there was a specific reason for it being placed there. Morhange 22:40, 16 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

She is one of the many Anastasia Impostors, like Anna Anderson, that's why she's here.--Sophie-Lou 16:33, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Anna Anderson was NOT an imposter.

Did the aliens tell you so? - Nunh-huh 20:33, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

NO, but the evidence told me so retard. There is no proof the samples tested were from Anna Anderson. If you would maybe read about the chain of custody, you would know that.

The chain of custody was just fine. It's hard to think of a more secure place for a biological specimen than the archives of a hospital's pathology department, where specimen identification is crucial - a matter of life and death, developed to a fine art, and part of routine everyday practice. Even if your space alien persuades you otherwise, your rejection of the established disproof of her pretended identity would not make her pretended identity proven. I suppose I should know better than to argue with the voices in your head. - Nunh-huh 00:23, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

-Yeah, too bad the hospital VP and Penny Jenkins twice denied having any remains of AA before this tissue magically appeared. Believe what you want, but that is just odd no matter which way you think of it.

So secure they had to look three times to locate it. - Nunh-huh 05:10, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Umm. What? Are you aware they COULDN't find it? It wasn't there under the name. It had been missing. It was most likely being contaminated.