Welcome—ask questions about how to use or edit Wikipedia! (Am I in the right place?)

For other types of questions, use the search box, see the reference desk or Help:Contents. If you have comments about a specific article, use that article's talk page.
Do not provide your email address or any other contact information. Answers will be provided on this page only.
If your question is about a Wikipedia article, draft article, or other page on Wikipedia, tell us what it is!
Check back on this page to see if your question has been answered.
For real-time help, use our IRC help channel, #wikipedia-en-help.
New editors may prefer the Teahouse, a help area for beginners (but please don't ask in both places).

Search the frequently asked questions

Search the help desk archives and other help pages

April 8

Amanullah Rahmani

Amanullah Rahmani(born on 4 November 1993)is an Excellent Electrical Engineer.He is basically belongs to samastipur ,Bihar(INDIA).He complete graduation from jaipur national university (jaipur) with B.tech(EE). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.220.56.86 (talk) 06:36, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Did you have a question about using or editing Wikipedia? --David Biddulph (talk) 07:44, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Counters in a template

Hi,

Is it possible to create a counter in a template? Something like:

Gives:

Race1 Race 2 Race 3 Race 4 Race 5

Thanks for helping out.NED33 (talk) 08:08, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It's possible with a Lua module but I don't know whether there is currently one which can be used for your purpose, and I'm not a Lua programmer. You have enormous repetition in {{Sailing result block}}. You could consider a bunch of these instead:

{{#ifexpr:{{{races}}}>1|colspan=2 {{!}} '''Race 1''' {{!!}}}}{{#ifexpr:{{{races}}}>2|colspan=2 {{!}} '''Race 2''' {{!!}}}}...

. PrimeHunter (talk) 11:53, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your research and advise. And your right I'm looking for a better way for the sailing result block. However i'm hoping for something like:

{{Result|races=5}} that translate to:

For x := 1 to races

||Race {{{x}}}

Next x

What could get rid of the whole bundel of repetitions. Any idea who could help further?NED33 (talk) 13:57, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Lua requests, but if you only need 16 repetitions of {{#ifexpr:{{{races}}}>N|colspan=2 {{!}} '''Race N''' {{!!}}}} then it doesn't seem worth the trouble. PrimeHunter (talk) 17:00, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the pointer. I will see what it possible.NED33 (talk) 11:12, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Cite button

For some reason the 'cite' button on my toolbar has disappeared when I edit an article. I did have this issue occasionally in the past and found that a page refresh or two was all that was needed to make it appear again. This time however no amount of refreshes helps nor does restarting the computer. Any ideas what is causing this and how to fix it? --Wolbo (talk) 09:35, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Response at Wikipedia:Village pump (technical)#Cite menu on toolbar missing!. -- Gadget850^talk 09:41, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Signpost delivery and new username

Hi, I was just wondering if, when I change my username (which I did yesterday) if I need to resubscribe to things like the signpost, or will the bot automatically follow the redirect to my new talk page. Thanks. This is Paul (talk) 11:53, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@This is Paul: There are several other redirects in the list at Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Subscribe, and they seem to be working. -- John of Reading (talk) 17:53, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for getting back to me, John. I'm glad I don't have to scroll through the list looking for my signature. :) This is Paul (talk) 18:06, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Citing a database query

Is it possible to reference the result of a query executed on a website's database? Providing a link to the site's search page is not enough - the reader must actually perform a specific search to see the information that is being referenced. The search result page itself does not seem to have a distinct url. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 11:54, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You can use the at parameter in Template:Cite web#In-source locations, for example at=search on John Doe. PrimeHunter (talk) 12:00, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Does this make sense as a valid reference to find the total number of South African casualties in WW1 (as recorded by the Commonwealth War Graves Commission)? -- {{cite web|url=http://www.cwgc.org/find-war-dead.aspx |title=Find War Dead |publisher=CWGC |accessdate=2014-04-08 |at=Search parameters: "War=First World War" and "Served With=South African Forces"}} -- Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 12:23, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know how complete that database is for total casualties, but the suggested reference^[1] makes it easy for me to currently get "9591 record(s) match your search criteria". However, quotation marks usually indicate a whole string was copied directly so I would only put quotation marks on the selection.^[2] PrimeHunter (talk) 17:13, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

^ "Find War Dead". CWGC. Search parameters: "War=First World War" and "Served With=South African Forces". Retrieved 2014-04-08.
^ "Find War Dead". CWGC. Search parameters: War="First World War", Served With="South African Forces". Retrieved 2014-04-08.

odd redirections from all lowercase

When I do searches in wikipedia, often times I won't capitalize the first letter, just to make typing easier. However recently I've found that what it first finds in the search is not the Initial Capital version. For example, a search on 'denmark' goes to DENMARK which is a redirect to Denmark. florida goes to Flórida which is redirect to Florida. maryland goes to MarylanD which goes to Maryland. I've never seen the result of these lower case searches going to anything other than directly to the article. I am using "New Search" in the Beta features, should the discussion go to https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Talk:Search instead?Naraht (talk) 16:01, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No sign of similar behaviour with the normal search, so it sounds as if your problem is specific to the Beta. --David Biddulph (talk) 16:08, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I can reproduce this with Beta search, also for "Denmark" where https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search/Denmark uses the exact capitalization of Denmark but hits the redirect on DENMARK. This is silly, but at least I haven't found an example where it happens if the capitalized version doesn't redirect to the searched version. For example, "Ice" and "ice" find Ice and not ICE. Wikipedia:Village pump (technical)/Archive 123#Cirrus now a Beta Feature said to post to Bugzilla or https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Talk:Search. See https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Talk:Search#x.22WTF.22_search_results_37502. PrimeHunter (talk) 16:50, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Benefits enquiry

Header added by ColinFine (talk) 16:40, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

looking for unclaimed benefits for my late father Mpoyane Johannes Phoku who died due to long illness in 1987 05 05, worked for couple of years at transnet — Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.13.68.67 (talk) 16:20, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I suspect, based on your question, that you found one of our over 6.9 million articles and thought we were affiliated in some way with that subject. Please note that you are at Wikipedia, the free online encyclopedia that anyone can edit, and this page is for asking questions related to using or contributing to Wikipedia itself. Thus, we have no special knowledge about the subject of your question. You can, however, search our vast catalogue of articles by typing a subject into the search field on the upper right side of your screen. If you cannot find what you are looking for, we have a reference desk, divided into various subject areas, where asking knowledge questions is welcome. Best of luck. --ColinFine (talk) 16:40, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

We would like a page about our company taken down

Dear Wikipedia,

I am writing in regards to the following page:

Consultancy Africa Intelligence

I am one of the managers within the company and I've been instructed by our Managing Director to see if we can get this page taken down. It was created by a third parties unknown to us using a single source and is outdated, inaccurate, and does not contain a Talk page to correspond with the creator(s). Could please advise me further about how to go about getting the article taken down or at least clearly labelled that we do not endorse the page and have no involvement with it? Thanks so much.

Kind regards,

Kyle Hiebert ACMM Production Coordinator, Internship Manager & Optimistic Africa unit manager Consultancy Africa Intelligence Your African partner in superior research and analysis Email: [email removed] Web: www.consultancyafrica.com LinkedIn: Kyle Hiebert — Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.138.66.241 (talk) 16:23, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please indicate the specific statements or claims on that page you take issue with? We can and will remove any inaccuracies, but I don't think it's likely the whole page will be taken down, nor a disclaimer attached to it. I also removed your email because this page is highly visible and we do not want you to receive spam or other unsolicited emails. Please contact the oversight team if you would like the email purged from the page history. --N Y Kevin 16:42, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kyle. I'm afraid that's not how Wikipedia works. Your approval is neither sought nor required, and we strongly prefer that articles are written by third parties, rather than by those connected to the subject, as the latter have a conflict of interest and may find it difficult to write in the required neutral tone. The main criterion for whether an article should be deleted is whether or not the subject is notable in Wikipedia's special sense, that is, whether it has been written about at length in reliable sources unconnected with the subject. At present, in my view, the references in the article do not establish this, and so the article is liable to be deleted - but because it does not establish notability, not because you don't like it. I suspect that the company does meet the criterion, in which case if somebody finds and adds suitable references, the article will not be deleted. Your best bet, as NYKevin says, is to explain on the article's talk page what changes you would like to see made, and then somebody uninvolved can decide what to do. If you accompany your suggestions with references to reliable sources, unconnected with the company, that will make it more likely that your changes will get incorporated. I have changed your URL to a wikilink, and somebody else has redacted your email address above. --ColinFine (talk) 16:56, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your comment about not having a talk page for the article creator. The creator was User:MsTingaK whose talk page is here. This information is found from the article's editing history. Spinning Spark 17:43, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I think they may have been referring to the article talk page, which they created to add a disclaimer. - Purplewowies (talk) 19:15, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I feel like saying that you'd prefer the third party's ideas on his company is just your way of glossing over the issue with your "policies" because in all reality whoever wrote that article could hate the company for no decent reason or it could have a totally different purpose today. It' really obnoxious for people to decide what stays and what goes based on such black and white principles. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.214.63.229 (talk) 22:57, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Principal author forgotten in the reference of an article + an error in the link

Dear Mrs or Mr,

In the following page, there is a error in the list of author and in the link :

Ultra-high-temperature ceramics

For the reference 56, the main author is J.F. Justin and the right link is AL03-08 (http://www.aerospacelab-journal.org/sites/www.aerospacelab-journal.org/files/AL3-08.pdf) so the exact text for this reference is :

J.F. Justin, A. Jankowiak (2011). "Ultra High Temperature Ceramics: Densification, Properties and Thermal Stability". Journal AerospaceLab. 3, AL03-08.

Thanks in advance for the correction.

144.204.16.1 (talk) 17:45, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed in this edit.--ukexpat (talk) 18:00, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Submitting an article for review and publishing

I've created an article in my sandbox. How do I submit it for review to be published on Wikipedia? DBynum Media (talk) 17:57, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Add {{subst:submit}} to the top of the draft and click save, but in its current form it will be rejected as it does not cite a single source demonstrating notability and it reads like a promo piece not a Wikipedia article (probably not surprising in view of your user name).--ukexpat (talk) 18:00, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Draft now speedily deleted as spam per G11 and username blocked.--ukexpat (talk) 20:02, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

City of Tustin, California (Mayor's name is incorrect)

I need to edit the summary box on the City of Tustin Wikipedia page. The Mayor is inaccurate. It should read Al Murray, NOT Jerry Amonte. I do not see an edit option near this summary box like with the other sections.

Tustin

Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.162.231.14 (talk) 19:29, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you click the edit tab at the top of the article, you should be able to edit the details in the infobox.--ukexpat (talk) 19:57, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done in this edit.--ukexpat (talk) 20:00, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for being so speedy in updating the Mayor of Tustin. Would it be possible to edit "Al Murray" to read "Elwyn Al Murray"?

Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.162.231.14 (talk) 21:45, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done The city website only lists the mayor as "Al Murray", not "Elwyn". Rwessel (talk) 03:56, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Surely not Al Murray? Alansplodge (talk) 12:33, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Iowa Gubernatorial Election 2014

In reference to your link Iowa gubernatorial election, 2014

Dr. Lee Hieb is also running on the Libertarian ticket.

http://www.hieb2014.org/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.227.170.251 (talk) 22:05, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've converted your URL to a wikilink. Please make your suggestion at Talk:Iowa gubernatorial election, 2014, preferably with a reference from a source not connected to Dr Hieb. --ColinFine (talk) 10:17, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Username

How do I change my username?

current username: J-a-design — Preceding unsigned comment added by J-a-design (talk • contribs) 22:57, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User:J-a-design: Please take a look at WP:CHU. All the info is there. - Purplewowies (talk) 23:39, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your only edit is to this page, so no point requesting a change of name, just create a new account that complies with the user name policy.--ukexpat (talk) 13:32, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

April 9

Citing this website

I was wondering if there is anyway to cite a file from the FAA that is no longer on the internet without using the URL. Also, if possible, would an article that uses it still pass a Featured Article review. The URL is/was: https://oeaaa.faa.gov/oeaaa/external/searchAction.jsp?action=displayOECase&oeCaseID=157759707

A snapshot of what the file looked like is here: http://parkrumors.com/busch-gardens-drop-tower-to-be-330ft-tall/

--Dom497 (talk) 02:25, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't verified what you are trying to do but the formatting would probably work like this:

{{citation |url=https://oeaaa.faa.gov/oeaaa/external/searchAction.jsp?action=displayOECase&oeCaseID=157759707 |title= Title |archiveurl=http://parkrumors.com/busch-gardens-drop-tower-to-be-330ft-tall/|archivedate=2002-09-30 |accessdate=2005-07-06 }}

I can't say what a Featured Article review would mean, but there is no requirement that anything be online. It just makes it easier to verify.— Vchimpanzee · talk · contributions · 21:29, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

9/11 deaths of law enforcement officers

Good afternoon,

I would like to request a change to the 9/11 page at September 11 attacks. In the second paragraph of the article at the very top of the page, it ends with the statement "It also was the deadliest incident for firefighters in the history of the United States." 9/11 was also the deadliest day in US law enforcement, as we lost 72 officers on that day, information that can be verified at the National Law Enforcement Officer's Memorial Fund page (http://www.nleomf.org/facts/enforcement/deadliest.html) I would appreciate it if the 9/11 page could be updated to include this information to reflect the sacrifice of those officers and to give them the honor and reverence their sacrifice is due. Thank you for your attention to this request, it is greatly appreciated.

Respectfully yours,

George Curtis 168.156.70.4 (talk) 02:52, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Clarityfiend (talk) 08:57, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nigeria

As a registered member of Wikipedia, how can I contribute towards adding latest information and updates on Nigeria? Nigeria — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ugobassey (talk • contribs) 04:59, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

See How to edit a page and How to develop articles. Please note all information must be properly cited. -- Fauzan^{✆ talk} _{✉ email} 06:09, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hellp, Ugobassey. You might like to join WP:WikiProject Nigeria. --ColinFine (talk) 10:21, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Collateral protection insurance and QBE Insurance

The Administrator of this false article has been posting false articles about his former employer, bosses and co-workers for the last three years. Using personal names and putting phone numbers on the internet that have resulted in threats to employees families. All of the articles he references in this particular article are false since he wrote them. He has spent the last three years harassing people and creating false and defamatory information. Each time an attempt is made to correct this article, he blocks the revision.

At this point Wikipedia may be liable for this author/administrators malicious and defamatory remarks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.251.44.140 (talk) 05:07, 9 April 2014‎ (UTC)[reply]

You have been reverted by several people, including myself, for your additions, and if you are trying to make a legal threat, please read WP:LEGAL. I don't have much insight into the whole situation, here (and it's too late here to look into it), so hopefully others can provide more advice. - Purplewowies (talk) 05:51, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No one owns any article here, any one is free to edit as long as the information added is sourced reliably. Personally identifiable information is not added on wikipedia. Regarding the source, Huffington post is quite reliable. Talk to the editors who have posted messages on your talk page and explain to them why the information should be removed. Also read all the notices on your talk page. If there is no reasonable ground for removal, it will not be removed.

Also see Wikipedia:General disclaimer and WP:LEGAL, wikipedia is not liable.-- Fauzan^{✆ talk} _{✉ email} 06:02, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Here's a boomerang. Maproom (talk) 06:37, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Update enquiry on article: Telenyem Renner Ikuru

Pls I'd like to know the status of my article: Telenyem Renner Ikuru. Your response pls — Preceding unsigned comment added by Godswill Jumbo (talk • contribs) 08:26, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It's here: Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Telenyem Renner Ikuru. Please use only one account on Wikipedia; you may use either your original account User:Godswill Apiafi Jumbo or User:Godswill Jumbo. Please also avoid hijacking other users' pages in order to create your own. Yunshui ^雲 _水 09:08, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Custom infoboxes

Hi, I'm trying to create my own infobox for unidentified people and murder victims, but the template doesn't want to work. If someone could help me with this, I would greatly appreciate it. --GouramiWatcher^(?) 13:03, 9 April 2014 (UTC) [reply]

I think there is a move to use {{Infobox person}} as much as possible to reduce the proliferation of people-related infoboxes. If you think additional parameters should be added to that template, please make your request at Template talk:Infobox person.--ukexpat (talk) 13:38, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

What happened to the reference toolbar

There use to be a "Cite" button. See: Help:Introduction to referencing/3

Samw (talk) 14:50, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

See section #Cite button here yesterday. --David Biddulph (talk) 14:56, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

references

In trying to correct a reference, I ended up with two for the same municode. How do I delete the incorrect one #4 on the Boca Raton Library page?

Many thanks for your guidance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sea Lark (talk • contribs) 17:15, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Sea Lark. You can remove references by simply deleting the corresponding code and <ref></ref> tags in the editing interface, like this: [1]. And you can use the same reference more than once by giving it a name on the first use (like this:<ref name="NAME">DETAILS OF REF</ref>) and then putting <ref name="name_here" /> for subsequent uses. Another thing you could use if you want is citation templates, for instance {{cite web|url=|title=|author=|date=|website=|publisher=|accessdate=}} for citing websites (just fill in the fields). benzband (talk) 17:56, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

In other words, see referencing for beginners.--ukexpat (talk) 19:57, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reset Password

Hello,

Curious as i am while i watch documentaries i regularly check some details or additional information on wikipedia, today i checked an article that showed quite some incorrect data, i don't find myself in the position of writing articles so i wanted to add something to the talk page. I remembered i once made an account of which i could remember everything except the password. So i entered my username and e-mail and it said i wil get a reset password e-mail. Well it's been allmost 2h and i'm still waiting for that e-mail, could someone help me with this problem.

Thx in advance — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:1811:4802:FF00:A116:EBC0:E303:97D2 (talk) 18:52, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, have you checked your "spam" folder, in case the password-reset email got classified as spam by accident? benzband (talk) 19:29, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you enter a user name into the "Reset Password" dialog, the email will be sent to the email address saved with that account, which may not be the email address that you've typed into the dialog. -- John of Reading (talk) 20:39, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dates for Featured Article Status

Where can I find the exact date on which an article received "Featured" status? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.184.206.241 (talk) 22:06, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you look on the article talk page of a Featured Article, there should be a banner near the top that tells you just that. --Jayron32 22:39, 9 April 2014 (UTC) I see it--thank you![reply]

Incorrect information

How do you complain about people editing pages and inserting incorrect information?

thanks Michaiah2007 (talk) 22:35, 9 April 2014 (UTC)michaiah[reply]

You don't complain. You ask polite questions on the article talk page in question, or you find who made the edit, and you ask them politely. --Jayron32 22:39, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Or you can revert their changes, once only, with an edit summary explaining why you think their changes were inappropriate. If they do not accept your reversion, then the two of you should certainly discuss the matter. See WP:BOLD. --ColinFine (talk) 23:31, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

April 10

Creating your Own Wikipedia page

I am responsible to create my version of a Wikipedia page explaining the concept and theories of intercultural communication. I am aware that this website already has a topic of such sort. Is there a way where I can start from a fresh page and build my own style so there is no plagiarism taken into account during the process? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dmatteo051 (talk • contribs) 00:29, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Well, Wikipedia doesn't allow multiple articles on a single topic. You're welcome to edit the existing page, but you shouldn't start a new page on Intercultural communication since one already exists. Howicus (Did I mess up?) 00:45, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If some professor or teacher has given this to you as an assignment, they do not understand at all how we work or what we are for. If this is a "sample piece" as part of a writing job test, you are being ripped off by an unscrupulous (or very clueless; or both) "employer". --Orange Mike | Talk 04:42, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Federalist Papers, Request

I have a request for the Federalist Papers section of Wikipedia. Currently most Federalist paper pages have a summary, synopsis or the like which I still believe it is good given the ability to look back and see how they were viewed and received. Also for a person who just wants to get the gist of the document without reading the entire document. Some papers pages have a link to a photograph of the paper in question which is grainy and hard to read. I suggest a transcribed version of each document, word for word, so a person wanting to read the exact words written on the subject by our founding fathers is available to anyone coming to that certain page.

Federalist No. 1
Federalist No. 10
File:The Federalist (Ford).djvu— Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.247.69.40 (talk) 00:39, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Is this what you want? I believe it's the Federalist papers on Wikisource CTF83! 00:48, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

software Engineering

the effort and cost required to build the software.Use any estimation technique? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 106.66.180.227 (talk) 03:30, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please do your own homework.
Welcome to the Wikipedia Help desk. Your question appears to be a homework question. I apologize if this is a misevaluation, but it is our policy here not to do others' homework, but merely to aid them in doing it themselves. Letting someone else do your homework does not help you learn how to solve such problems.
Please attempt to solve the problem yourself first. You can search Wikipedia or search the Web.
If you need help with a specific part of your homework, the Reference desk can help you grasp the concept. Do not ask knowledge questions here, just those about using Wikipedia. --Orange Mike | Talk 04:46, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fraudulent Wikipedia article about a 'Daniell Family'

Hello, I have recently joined Wikipedia and have been reading Wikipedia articles about a lot of families on Wikipedia (I am interested in family histories).

I came across an article about a so called " Daniell Family " . This article does not seem to make sense at all as most information mentioned is not linked to the subject of the article and none of the sources listed are referring to this "Daniell family". I cannot find any further information about the notability or importance of this family on the internet either.

When I looked at the history of this article, I came across several Wikipedia accounts all created on the 9th of April and all of them have similar editing patterns on their talk pages. It seems like they are sockpuppets.

I am very worried about this article, as somebody might be creating an article about their own family, making them seem more important/notable than they really are. I have a feeling this article might turn into something serious or fraudulent, as this article claims links with famous important families and institutions, such as the Rockefeller family and Harvard University, when there are no legitimate sources anywhere confirming any link with anybody or anything mentioned in this article.

Furthermore, this article vaguely mentions links to two English painters, but I cannot find any confirmation anywhere about the links with these painters.

I would appreciate it if an experienced editor would seriously take a look at the accounts editing this page and consider deleting the article. Thanks--OhioJack (talk) 04:53, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It certainly looks a little suspicious, as you say - I'll look into it further. AndyTheGrump (talk) 05:07, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like large portions of information and the sources have been copied from the article about the Rockefeller family.--OhioJack (talk) 05:08, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

In the Family residences section, they have not even bothered to edit "Rockefeller" to "Daniell". This hoax article should be deleted. Maproom (talk) 06:05, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Article has been deemed a hoax and tagged for speedy deletion. ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 06:12, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've deleted the article and restored the legitimate redirect that used to be at that title. Graham87 07:23, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

redirected page

I have been drafting an article but it now has a redirect that the page has been renamed/moved. I cant find the page and I cannot draft another version because it takes me back to the same redirect page. I cannot make sense of the instructions and do not know why this has happened. Help please — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fulhamoldboy (talk • contribs) 05:32, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and welcome to the help desk. Your draft was previously located at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Nigel Randell Evans, which now redirects to Draft:Nigel Randell Evans. This is where your draft is located. Your draft was moved into the "Draft:" namespace as that is the preferred location for article drafts. Hope this helps, ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 06:16, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You can use the "contributions" link at the very top of the page (as well as in your signature and other places) to find out where you have edited. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 12:29, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Is posting the raw translation of articles acceptable, or should I format them?

I plan on using Duolingo to mass translate a bunch of articles. I find articles that need translations, and then I have the community translate them.

Usually, I'd get the translation, and then format it myself. This, however, takes a lot of my time and I'd prefer not spending all day formatting articles.

I was thinking, would it be acceptable if I just posted the raw translation without the formatting, and leave it to the community to format?

For example, here is an original translation: Federalist Papers

And here is what a raw translation would look like: User:The Red Rat Writer/sandbox

I ask this, because I've noticed that the community helps out with the articles by adding link to them and whatont. — Preceding unsigned comment added by The Red Rat Writer (talk • contribs) 08:01, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I am having difficulty understanding your question. When you write "the community", do you refer to the community of Wikipedia editors? My guess is that you are proposing to create machine-translated articles, in the hope that other Wikipedia editors will then do the rest of the work. If I am right, it would help to see a specimen machine-translated example. The example you have given of a "raw translation" is not translated at all, it is in Spanish. Maproom (talk) 08:39, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

– and your example of an "original translation" was created in English, as one might expect of an article concerning the creation of the US constitution. Maproom (talk) 09:09, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

For advice on translating from other languages into English, see Wikipedia:Translation. For advice on translating from other languages into English, also see Wikipedia:Translate us. Please note that Wikipedia:Translation says "Wikipedia consensus is that an unedited machine translation, left as a Wikipedia article, is worse than nothing." --David Biddulph (talk) 09:16, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize, I mean community as the Duolingo Community (https://www.duolingo.com/), and 'original translation' was supposed to be 'original article'. The sandbox page I linked to is the actual translation. I meant format as in titles, boxes, rows, references and general organization.The Red Rat Writer (talk) 14:32, 10 April 2014 (UTC)The Red Rat Writer[reply]

This is a potential copyright issue. When the members of the duolingo community translate something, each contributor hold the copyright to their share of the translation. Unless duolingo has somehow arranged to have the finished work licensed under the CC BY-SA 3.0 License or some other license that is compatible with Wikipedia, we can't use it. Jc3s5h (talk) 14:38, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Timeline errors

Could someone fix the errors in User:Tomcat7/Sandbox1? Regards.--Tomcat (7) 10:01, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The syntax required is described at Help:EasyTimeline syntax, but (for the first error at least) the error message is self-explanatory. The error message says "Period attribute 'from' invalid. Specify year >= 1800." because Help:EasyTimeline syntax#DateFormat tells you that "this format is only allowed for dates starting from 01/01/1800" and you had tried to use "01/01/1700". --David Biddulph (talk) 10:23, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a timeline that accepts years before 1800? Regards.--Tomcat (7) 10:30, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Can i merge these accounts?

I have a uncompleted global ccount named "Manedwolf" (My main wiki user page). There are three acounts named "Manedwolf" too in english, spanish and commons, which aren't active since 2005, 2007 and 2007 respectivly, from what i saw in the user contribution and talk pages.
Is it possible to merge these all or merge the accounts named "Dorhi" with "Manedwolf? – Dorhi (talk) 12:20, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

see WP:USURP. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 12:26, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Look at the 2nd note under "Notes". Is it refers to my en.wiki account (which is not active) or to my main account (which is constantly active)?--Dorhi (talk) 12:36, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No problem there. In your case of wanting to unify Manedwolf, it either doesn't apply at all, or it applies to the Manedwolf account at other wikis. PrimeHunter (talk) 13:19, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Primary and secondary source

I haven't edited Wikipedia for a long time, so:

For example, if I write in the article Captain America 2 "Website A says this movie will have a sequel", should I cite it to A, or to another source B that says the same information? If I cite it to A, is A considered primary source or secondary source?

Are there any diff if I only write "This movie will have a sequel" and cite it to A?--Lê _{talk-contributions} 13:09, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Primary sources are sources which do not provide analysis or context for information. Primary sources are raw data. For example, census records or birth certificates are primary sources. They provide no context. Secondary sources are sources where people research primary sources and the provide analysis and context for those sources. For example, a book where someone has gone through census records and produced statements about demographic trends based on those census records. Wikipedia accepts both equally fine, so neither is a problem. However, you cannot provide your own analysis cited to a primary source. You cannot, say, cite the U.S. census and then say something like "So-and-so live in blighted areas" based on that. You need to find someone else who has reached that conclusion. The issue is not whether a source is primary or secondary source, the issue is that you cannot go beyond what the source directly says in Wikipedia. A reliable source is reliable. If you have a good, reliable source for information about a sequel, for example if the producers of the movie have themselves said that they plan to produce a sequel, then go with that. If the source is "Unconfirmed reports say..." and it appears on Joe Schmoe's Movie Blog, then no, that isn't reliable. --Jayron32 16:37, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Support needed on article "Hochtief"

Hi there, We left a longer piece on the "talk" page of our company`s entry "Hochtief" as the article has to be updated. Unfortunately we have the impression that there is not much traffic on the talk page. No one seems to feel "responsible" for reviewing and perhaps editing. As there are several things outdated or wrong, we would like to ask for support. We cannot do it on our own as we are the company described. Please help. Thank you Kind regards CG at Hochtief Corporate Press Department 13:17, 10 April 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Christian Gerhardus at Hochtief (talk • contribs)

Hello, if it is likely that you won't get a response on the talk page, there are always active editors available for help and also in your time zone. Regarding the article about the organization, you might also get help here; Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Companies. It is recommended that you explain on the relevant talk or help page specifically what is outdated or wrong, and what information to add, to help an editor quickly understand what you need.-- Fauzan^{✆ talk} _{✉ email} 14:21, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict) Thank you for not editing the article directly – as you are aware, this would involve a conflict of interest. If corrections and updates are needed to the page, please provide details on the article's talk page, preferably with references. What you have done is to provide five screenfuls of text, translated from German Wikipedia, with the formatting lost – possibly the changes you want made can be deduced by comparing this with the current article, but I, for one, am not going to bother reading through it in the hope of finding out what it is you want corrected. Maproom (talk) 14:35, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

references

Can someone help me out on how to reference thi sources on wikipedia? 1. Abang Njuosi (ed) (2008) Kom Folktales. Vol. 1 2. www.wikipedia.org/warren m. robbins

Here's my article:

This isn't the place for an article's text

The Afo-A-Kom (Mbang) is the foremost symbol of the Kom people of the North West Region of Cameroon. The carver of this statue is unknown but It is speculated that Afo-A-Kom was carved by the second traditional leader (Foyn/Fon)of the Kom people in the 1920s. In the 1960s, the Afo-A-Kom was stolen from its sacred grove at Laikom which is the seat of the Kom people, where the Foyn resides by one of the princes with the help of some elders and sold to a middle man who later on sold it to an art dealer who took it to the United States of America. The Kom people believe that the Afo-A-Kom possesses mystical powers and that shortly after it got to the US; it started disturbing its new owners by destroying everything around it. Its new owner took it and threw it into the sea but only to get back home and see the Afo-A-Kom. He took it to a New York art gallery where he sold it for circa 15 million CFA, while there; another American Warren M. Robbins, an arts collector saw and recognized it from his visit to Cameroon and raised an alarm. He raised funds together with some Kom elite in the US to purchase from the Manhattan art gallery the bearded icon called Afo-A-Kom, considered sacred by the Kom people which had been taken from the Laikom hill-top village in Cameroon in 1966. Returning the figure, Robbins was welcomed by Nsom Ngwe, the then Fon of the om people, the President of Cameroon, Ahmadou Ahidjo among other dignitaries. During the reception of the statue in Yaounde, President Ahidjo suggested to Fon Nsom Ngwe that Mbang be kept in the National Museum in Yaounde but he replied that if the President can provide enough space in Yaounde for him to go and bring the Kom people to stay with it there, then he would accept the president’s proposal. The president found outr that the Kom and the Afo-A-Kom were inseperable as such he made it possible for it to be taken back to its habitual residence at Laikom.However, it was briefly put on display at the Tourism Office in Yaounde and later on transported by air to the Bamenda. It was then ferried by a delegation of the dignitaries of the region back to Fundong where it was handed back to the Kom people. It now resides peacefully thereafter at the Laikom palace where it is put on display annually for the Kom people and their friends to view it.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Jnshing (talk • contribs) 15:31, 10 April 2014 (UTC) [reply]

This isn't the place for an article's text, so I've collapsed it. All you need to do is to provide a wikilink, in this case to Afo-A-Kom. In your version you had an error message which said "Cite error: There are <ref> tags on this page, but the references will not show without a {{reflist}} template (see the help page).", and in that message the words " help page " were in blue, indicating that they are a wikilink to specific help on your problem, in this case at Help:Cite errors/Cite error refs without references. I have corrected that error for you, but for further information on referencing you should read WP:Referencing for beginners, and you should also read about bare urls.

One of the things which you were trying to use as a reference was "www.wikipedia.org/warren m. robbins". There are a number of problem with that:

Firstly for links to Wikipedia we don't quote a URL like "www.wikipedia.org/warren m. robbins", but instead we give a wikilink like Warren M. Robbins, and please note that the titles of Wikipedia pages are case-sensitive.
Secondly wikis (including Wikipedia) can not be used as reliable sources for references, for reasons given at WP:USERG. I have therefore removed that from the references, but included a wikilink to Warren M. Robbins when you mentioned him in the text.

Other editors will look at your article and decide whether it satisfies Wikipedia's requirements, particularly for demonstration of notability. I have added some useful links to your user talk page, and one particular one which you should read is WP:Your first article. --David Biddulph (talk) 16:02, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have made some stylistic and formatting changes. Given its history, it's probably a notable subject, but it desperately needs more sources. I don't have time to research further.--ukexpat (talk) 17:00, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Referencing errors on Draft:Swetha Warrier

Reference help requested. Sir, 'Swetha Warrier' was my first article and I didn't fully know the technicalities of creating an article. After I saved the page, an error has been reported about a reference list being missing. I don't know how to edit it further. Kindly help me out. Thanks a lot. Thanks, Wsarath (talk) 16:25, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The duplication of text was causing the error. I have removed that text which has fixed the problem.--ukexpat (talk) 16:32, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Longest article titles

Does WP list the longest titles of articles? If not, how would you go about finding the longest article title? How about this one:

An act to specify the size of the precious-metal blanks that will be used in the production of the National Baseball Hall of Fame commemorative coins

A follow up question: Is this even an appropriate name for an article? Rgrds. --64.85.217.151 (talk) 16:30, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Most Bills and Acts have short titles, such as Patriot Act and those are the ones we use, per WP:COMMONNAME.--ukexpat (talk) 16:34, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:RECORDS#Article with longest title. --Glaisher [talk] 16:39, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I am helping host a global event to update wikipedia contact on behalf of my organization

I was interested to see if there was anybody from Wikipedia in the New York/New Jersey area that could be made available on site to help us in case we have questions.

My contact details are: Miles Dolphin - 212-526-1833 (email: miles.dolphin@barclayscapital.com)

this would be for June 12th. - Miles — Preceding unsigned comment added by Miles dolphin (talk • contribs) 17:25, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Others reading this should also check out Wikipedia:Barclays edit-a-thon (which I found from Miles' contribs) which has some more information. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 17:46, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Randor1980

USER BLOCKED

Moving on.--ukexpat (talk) 18:45, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Randor1980 has been trolling many pages. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Efkwoherfpiowuehrf (talk • contribs) 18:29, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Help wanted with a disagreeable article

Dear editors: I rescued THIS ARTICLE some time ago from the G13 deletion pile, and just now got around to checking to see if I could improve it with reliable sources. Unfortunately, I have a very low tolerance for explicit language. I am looking for someone with a tougher skin to take an interest in this and either pronounce it non-notable or fix it up. I don't want to reject it because I find the references personally distasteful. —Anne Delong (talk) 18:49, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It fails WP:NMUSIC and also falls afoul of WP:NOTINHERITED. The only "new" reliable source I could dig up is a Huffington Post article about the Observer article. I'd say throw this fish back; it's just too small. Clarityfiend (talk) 03:17, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Adding images to a category

How can a file be added to a category? I would like to add File:Kafka portrait.jpg to Category:20th-century writers. Thanks in advance, XOttawahitech (talk) 19:13, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The file on Commons is already in Commons commons:Category:Franz Kafka so any new cat should be added to that category. In fact that category should probably be added to one of the country specific Commons "20th-century writers" categories.--ukexpat (talk) 19:39, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Forgot to add that the easiest way to add categories is the HotCat gadget that you can enable in your Preferences --> Gadgets.--ukexpat (talk) 20:19, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Help

Thanks, I'm just a student and I have to ask or prepare questions about the topic loanwords. The name of the book is read up on contents areas by Build & Grow. Please help, I'm dying 190.154.115.2 (talk) 19:18, 10 April 2014 (UTC)Ricky[reply]

I'm sorry you're dying, but I haven't a clue what you are asking for, or why you are asking it on the Wikipedia help desk (which is for questions about editing Wikipedia. It's possible you can get some help on the Wikipedia reference desk (Specifically the language reference desk if the question is about loanwords), but if you post it there you'd better be much clearer what you are asking for and what you have done on your homework so far. --ColinFine (talk) 22:50, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Need help removing Reads like an Advertisement alert at top of page

Hi, I am editing a page (that is about the man and company I work for) and I am trying to remove the alert at the top of the page. The page title is Adrian Ballinger. It says the page reads like and advertisement and also that it might contain faulty external links. However, I have edited it to remove unnecessary info and links and I have written it as best I can from a neutral point of view. The alert is still at the top of the page. Does it take time for this alert to be removed or am I not editing the Adrian Ballinger page properly? Your help will be much appreciated. Thank you - B — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alpenren (talk • contribs) 20:55, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

To editor Alpenren: People are discouraged from editing articles about subjects with which they are affiliated; this presents a conflict of interest. You should propose any further changes as well as a review of the advertising issue on the talk page at Talk:Adrian Ballinger. Anon126 (talk - contribs) 21:23, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have made it read a bit less like an advert, by deleting some puffery, and removing all the invalid references (the ones which just led to a domain, not to an article which mentioned Ballinger). The article is now short of references. If you can add some valid references, to actual articles which mention Ballinger, it may help. Maproom (talk) 22:22, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Alpenren. Tags like that are inserted and removed manually, by editors who think it is appropriate to add or remove one. Normally, if you think that a tag is no longer appropriate, you are welcome to remove it; but as Anon126 explained, you are strongly discouraged from editing that article because of your conflict of interest. --ColinFine (talk) 22:52, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The twelve visions party.

I need to send out a message concerning the deletion of TVP page on Wikipedia. Can you help me?

Sincerely Robert — Preceding unsigned comment added by 47.54.14.96 (talk) 21:29, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

What kind of message are you hoping to send out about Twelve Visions Party and to whom? If your question is about contacting a particular user, you can do so at their talk page.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 22:19, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Help Editing a Page

Hello, wondering if someone can help me.

I've been trying to update a wiki page, and have found a number of different articles relating to the topic and used these as references within the updates. Everytime I update the article I receive a message from a user advising that I have uploading promotional or advertising material and they delete my updates which is extremely frustrating.

The updates I'm making are from third party articles, non of which is trying to promote or advertise on the page but rather provide factual information.

Please advise what I can do to ensure the updates remain on the page.

Many thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shayle1 (talk • contribs) 23:12, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User:Shayle1: Your additions to Fetch TV kind of come off as a catalog entry, which is something Wikipedia doesn't do; see WP:NOTCATALOG - Purplewowies (talk) 23:27, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You may also want to look at Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and WP:RS. - Purplewowies (talk) 23:28, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

Thanks for the update. I had quite a few references included all of which were third party. It was a factual overview of the product. The page that was there before I ended it was actual the same format, however the information included was inaccurate so I was trying to fix those. As a result half of the page has been deleted.

Is there anything else I can do?

Thanks again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shayle1 (talk • contribs) 23:34, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The first thing I would recommend is coming to the understanding that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and not a free promotional web page about a company and its products. And then read up about what Wikipedia considers a reliably published source. And then when you find sources that meet the criteria, present the content in a non promotional manner, representing both the positive aspects and negative views of the subject. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 02:16, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User:TheRedPenOfDoom The information I have included in my updates is not used in a promotional context. It is explaining in detail what the page is about. I have researched it and made multiple third party references - all of which meet the Wiki criteria. The references do also show comparisons between other similar services, pointing out the positive and negative aspects. This page originally had inaccurate information and I am just trying to fix that. People should be reading correct information, so I can't understand why someone would be deleting this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shayle1 (talk • contribs) 06:57, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

When I looked, I saw a Tumblr page being used as a source. Those aren't generally considered reliable. That doesn't speak to the reliability of other sources. In addition, one of the pages I linked you to expressly states why comparisions might be considered a bad thing in encyclopedic context. It may be useful to point out characteristics of a product or thing, but it must be done from an encyclopedic standpoint. - Purplewowies (talk) 13:20, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

April 11

Photo

Please tell me why my uploaded photo ( File:The_Tridels_2014.jpg )is not appearing in my article on The Tridels. All I'am getting is a box with the caption, no photo. I placed the proper link

File:The Tridels 2014. jpg

The Tridels’ Mike, Jackie and Art in 2014

even uploaded the photo again with a different title...no joy. Could really use someone's help on this. Help Me — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.225.92.183 (talk) 02:47, 11 April 2014 (UTC) [reply]

You placed a space between the end dot and jpg. Try [[File:The_ Tridels_2014.jpg|125px|thumb|right|The Tridels’ Mike, Jackie and Art in 2014]] which results in the image to the left (yours will appear on the right). - Purplewowies (talk) 03:15, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm a senior interested in using public transportation

Where can I get DETAILED information about using MetroLink and AMTRAK. I have not used public transportation in 55 years. I'm thinking about going to Camarillo, Ventura, Oxnard and Santa Barbara. And, San Francisco (Bay Area.) I have no idea on what to do first. I live in Culver City. Thanks for any information. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.168.4.202 (talk) 02:50, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I suspect, based on your question, that you found one of our over 6.9 million articles and thought we were affiliated in some way with that subject. Please note that you are at Wikipedia, the free online encyclopedia that anyone can edit, and this page is for asking questions related to using or contributing to Wikipedia itself. Thus, we have no special knowledge about the subject of your question. You can, however, search our vast catalogue of articles by typing a subject into the search field on the upper right side of your screen. If you cannot find what you are looking for, we have a reference desk, divided into various subject areas, where asking knowledge questions is welcome. Best of luck. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 03:06, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Going beyond that, you may want to start at the official Amtrak and Metrolink websites. You should be able to find the most reliable and up to date information about routes, tickets, etc. at these sites. Wikipedia does have limited coverage of routes (i.e. List of Amtrak routes and Metrolink (Southern California)) which you may also find helpful, though you should rely on the official websites and schedules for the most recent and reliable information. ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 03:11, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Creating Wikipedia Page for my college

Hi this is shiva,

I am working in Thiagaraja school of management in Madurai as a Chair Placement/Corporate Relations.We are a 52 year old Institute and the oldest B school in South India.Currently we are planning to create a Wikipedia page for our school which would help us to create more awareness about our brand.So please do help us in creating a wikipedia page for our College.

Regards Shivaraj — Preceding unsigned comment added by 218.248.31.248 (talk) 05:30, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Shivaraj. The first thing you should do is read about conflict of interest, and understand why you should not directly work on an article about your college. The second is to read WP:PROMOTION, to understand that to "create more awareness about our brand" is something that is absolutely and completely forbidden on Wikipedia.

Then, if you still want to go ahead, you should collect reliable sources (such as major newspapers, or books from reliable publishers) that are unconnected with the college and say something substantial about the college. If you can find such sources, then the college passes Wikipedia's test for 'notability', and you can either request an article at Requested articles, or try writing one yourself, and getting it reviewed, by the Articles for creation process. --ColinFine (talk) 08:45, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Edit attempts rejected

Hi,

I'm marketing Manager at MACH Sarl which has been acquired by Starhome which is now Starhome Mach. All my attempts to update the MACH Sarl page MACH S.a.r.L to reflect the acquisition and other changes have been rejected.

Please let me know the best way to proceed.

Best regards

Chabha Djouder — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.7.12.58 (talk) 09:47, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It's clearly an advertisement you're adding. "Starhome MACH’s combined strength brings...", "STARHOME MACH continues to address and anticipate the challenges...", "they are designed to meet your challenges head on", etc. First you shouldn't really edit the article based on conflict of interest. If you do, you must adhere to strict neutral point of view. CTF83! 09:56, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe add neutral material backed by disinterested, reliable sources. By contrast, here's an example of what you added but was, rightly, then deleted:

Starhome MACH’s combined strength brings to market a unified set of solutions that provides one place to manage [Does "brings to market a unified set of solutions that provides one place to manage" mean something other than "manages", and if so, what?] your wholesale and retail business, [Mine? I don't have a wholesale or retail business, let alone both.] simplifying the life of the roaming department, whilst driving more business value from the roaming network. [What is a "roaming network"?] The company has a wide range of network and cloud-based solutions [What are "solutions"? A "wide range" as evaluated by who?] wrapped with complete business intelligence [By "intelligence" do you mean "espionage", and if not, then what? And "complete" as evaluated by who?] and business management.

Even better, don't add any material at all. Instead, make suggestions on the talk page. -- Hoary (talk) 10:03, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

What to do about sockpuppets' edits?

(I couldn't find a really suitable noticeboard or village pump section for this question, so please tell me if I'm in the wrong place.) Is there any consensus about edits made by a sockpuppet of a blocked user? Do you revert them, revert unless they add something very good, or does it vary from case to case? There's a persistent sockmaster, Samima khatun, that uses socks to add low-quality text to some specific articles. I have seen editors remove text for the only reason that it was made by a sock of a banned user, but I'm not sure if that's according to the English Wikipedia consensus. Sjö (talk) 10:19, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Edits of banned users made in contravention of their ban, when discovered, are routinely reverted because banned editors are not allowed to edit by decision of the community. However, there is nothing to stop another editor restoring the material if they consider it good material, but they are then taking responsibility for it themselves and should be prepared to answer any challenge on verifiability etc. Edits made by a banned editor prior to their ban are not reverted merely because the user has been banned, but this may happen if there is a good reason for doing so (edits are disruptive, dubious verifiability, POV etc), it is then for the reverting editor to justify their revert. Blocked editors are in a somewhat different category. Editors are blocked in order to protect the encyclopaedia from some behaviour of that editor. If you discover a sock of a blocked editor you may be justified in reverting their edits if they are continuing with the same behaviour that led to their block. But then, you would probably be justified in reverting the edits even if you did not know it was a sock; it depends on the material. You would probably be better off taking the issue to the blocking admin and letting them deal with it. Spinning Spark 13:33, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Slight question to determine meaning: Are we talking about blocking or a topic or global ban? - Purplewowies (talk) 21:32, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a FAQ project for the WP:RD?

Hello everybody, I noticed the FAQ button on the Help desk. Is there any effort to archive frequently asked Reference desk questions, other than the automatic archives, which collect all questions? (I'm not suggesting to replace the "Search RD archives" button, just to give another means of accessing the topics.)

If not, would it be a WP:BADIDEA, in the sense that it would violate one of the WP:rules? If it's not a bad idea, what would the WP veterans think about it? Should it go into a certain namespace? For example, would User:One.Ouch.Zero/RDFAQ be appropriate for an index, or would it imply too much WP:OWNership? - ¡Ouch! (^{hurt me} / _{more pain}) 10:59, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It seems Wikipedia talk:Reference desk would be a better place to discuss this. You can also search for FAQ there. It shows there are old unmaintained pages at Wikipedia:Reference desk/FAQ and Wikipedia:Reference desk/Language/FAQs. WP:FAQ is a general FAQ for Wikipedia and not associated with the help desk. {{Help pages header}} is also transcluded on Wikipedia:Reference desk. PrimeHunter (talk) 12:16, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

BTFW, I totally forgot about the "Wikipedia_talk" namespace. Bummer. Wow, thanks, that's about what I wanted to start. WP:ICANTBELIEVETHATFAQWASDISCONTINUED5YEARSAGO. - ¡Ouch! (^{hurt me} / _{more pain}) 12:50, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Cape Elise

On behalf of the managers of the M/V Cape Elise, Empire Bulkers Limited: Reference is made to your section concerning very large bulk carriers (Capes) and the fact that you have published a digital picture with respect to the vessel under our management “Cape Elise” and certain comments concerning necessary repairs carried out, following an unfortunate marine incident. We consider that these actions cause unnecessary, negative publicity and should be avoided.

As Managers of the vessel in question, we kindly ask you to remove the said picture and the comments made completely. Should you wish to upload a different picture of the vessel in question and certain related comments, please send us your proposal for signing it off. For future reference, please avoid uploading any information and/or documentation and/or digital content of any nature related with the vessels under our management without our express written consent.

Please be guided accordingly. Many thanks.

Our rights are reserved. 83.235.22.241 (talk) 11:30, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Presumably relates to the article: Capesize. --David Biddulph (talk) 11:43, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Firstly, from the tone of your question I advise you to read WP:LEGAL. Having pointed that out, my opinion is that the picture adds little of value to the article, as it's not relevant to the article about the size of ships and there are other pictures demonstrating size. I have therefore been bold and removed it with this edit [2]. CaptRik (talk) 12:28, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think this is the place to make a decision over that and have restored the picture. Spinning Spark 12:41, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

(after edit conflict) Your request has a very legalistic tone. That's not what we do on this help desk. The purpose of Wikipedia is to create an encyclopaedia on all topics. Please explain how your proposed edit helps fulfil that goal. Also, we do not require, nor do we seek, your "sign off" for any aspect of our articles. Spinning Spark 12:41, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

And no, your "rights are not reserved". As per the notifications in the editing frames, when you pressed "submit" you agreed to release your statement under the CC BY-SA 3.0 License. We do not require and will not ask for your consent.-- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 13:59, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you may manage the organization, but the image was taken by someone who uploaded the image by themselves. So, first of all it is not a copyright violation, and does not require consent. You have the right to ask for an image to be removed only if someone copies an image you own or have taken, or if someone took your photograph and uploaded it without consent.

Regarding "publicity", there is nothing positive or negative here on Wikipedia. Any information is added to contribute to thee overall content of the article. And definitely, no one is going to consider the incident as something "negative", it is just a piece of information. -- Fauzan^{✆ talk} _{✉ email} 18:01, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

(after ec) I think the IP is more likely reserving their rights to take legal action elsewhere over the matter rather than trying to circumvent the CC licence. Of course, that will not help them here either. Should they explicitly (or even implicitly) make such a statement then they can no longer be allowed to take part in community discussions per the no legal threats policy. Spinning Spark 18:04, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

new started shoe company

The article that I am writing is about a new started shoe company. I wrote the article and sent it for a review and it got declined because of the references. My references were from their website since all of their references are in different magazines and not online. So my question is: How do I add those print articles as references in my article? Is it possible? Miktry (talk) 12:21, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

To demonstrate notability per WP:CORP, references must be from reliable third party sources, see WP:RS. The company's website is only good for confirming basic, non-controversial facts. I should also add that a new company is very unlikely to have received the significant third party coverage required to meet the notability guidelines.--ukexpat (talk) 12:33, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Referencing errors on Hugh Mundell

Reference help requested. I went in to correct a referencing error that I introduced but ended up screwing up other things. Can you help with this? Thanks, Ras2thebone (talk) 12:31, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

When you enter a URL in the {{cite web}} template, it has to have an appropriate prefix, like http:// or https://. You'd missed these out which was why the refs were showing oddly. I've also combined the multiple references to the same source into a single citation (see the page's edit history for the coding)~~, although I have my doubts as to whether that source meets the reliability guidelines.~~probably okay, actually. Yunshui ^雲 _水 12:51, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Percy Julian

Wiki

Someone has placed inappropriate verbiage into the " early life" section of chemist Percy Julian's bio. Mr. Julian is being honored today with a Google doodle -please correct as soon as possible. The language states Julian ate ass at an early age. 72.76.208.223 (talk) 14:50, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The vandal has been blocked and I've filed a request at WP:RPP. Thanks for your help. James^x12345 14:53, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

And next time you see something like that, revert it by going into the page's history page, finding the revision you want to revert, going to it by clicking "prev", and clicking on "undo" (you can also click "undo" on the history page if you already know which revision it is). Lugia2453 (talk) 14:55, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sónia Matias

Dear Wikipedia,

In Portugal when you look for the name "Sónia Matias" you only end up to a soccer player, but there is a female much more famous and known in Portugal that you misses out on.

She also is Sónia Matias, but she´s well known because de became the first female becoming professional in are arte of "cavaleira de toureio" wich in Inglish dosen´t exist, but it´s a kind of bull fight between the horse rider and the bull in the arena. Very famous in Spain, the only Country that in fact kills the bull afterwords.

But she is very famous in Portugal, professional artist, and much more well known the the soccer player Sónia Matias, howcame she dosen´t have no article ou Wikipedia?

For any information look at facebook "Sónia Matias"

Thank You

Nuno Guedes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.47.200.99 (talk) 15:08, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

She is briefly mentioned in Portuguese-style bullfighting#Main figures. Wikipedia is the free encyclopedia that anyone can edit. Articles are written by volunteers and noone has written an article about her yet but you could. This help desk is for the English Wikipedia and I don't know Portuguese but it appears you can request an article at pt:Wikipédia:Artigos pedidos, or write a suggested article at pt:Wikipédia:Guia de edição para anónimos. Wikipedia:Notability (people) is the requirement for the English Wikipedia but Portuguese may be different. Wikipedia languages can have different policies and I don't know the Portuguese Wikipedia but you are probably also allowed to create an article directly if you make an account. It's free and easy. PrimeHunter (talk) 15:56, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I found we have a photo of her at commons:File:Sonia Matias.jpg, but it's only used in a low resolution gallery in the Dutch article nl:Lusitano. PrimeHunter (talk) 16:21, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

PERCY JULIAN: Not Included in Wikipedia Inventor List

PERCY JULIAN: Google Doodle salutes pioneering chemist as a man utterly in his elements' – Not Included in Wikipedia Inventor List

It was refreshing to read about Percy Julian, his accomplishments and contributions to the American Science and Medical fields; and to the world.

The unfortunate reminder about your story, is the constant and continuous shroud of obscurity and anonymity that Black inventors are kept under.

How many White, Asian, Latino, European, tec. Children will go to Wikipedia List of inventors to search for inventors, and find no Black inventors listed, not even the late Percy Julian will appear on that list, you have to put in “Black Inventor, and how many people who are Not Black are going to do that:

Benjamin Banneker – Farmer’s Almanac
Elijah McCoy – The real McCoy
Charles Drew – Blood Plasma
Madam C. J. Walker – First Woman self-made millionaire, any race
George Washington Carver – Everything Peanut & Soybean
Garret Morgan – Traffic Lights

And many others!

Let’s stop excluding these Great Americans from their place in history with the rest of the Great American Inventors…

Yvette — Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.3.212.100 (talk) 17:24, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

WP:SOFIXIT - this is the encyclopedia anyone can edit.--ukexpat (talk) 17:29, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Are you looking for Percy Lavon Julian? At least, that is where Percy Julian redirects to. Spinning Spark 17:30, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done I have added Percy Lavon Julian to list of inventors.--ukexpat (talk) 17:41, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Tim Green

The page Tim Green does not look like it has been Edited right. Tim Green — Preceding unsigned comment added by PacoDaKing14Sportz (talk • contribs) 19:00, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I think you'll need to be a bit more specific with what you think is wrong. You can make suggestions at Talk:Tim Green. --David Biddulph (talk) 19:23, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

... or are you talking about the problem which another editor cured in this edit? --David Biddulph (talk) 19:28, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Photo Upload Problems

Hello, I am trying to upload a photo of Joey Moi to his page. I am his business manager and i would like his wikipedia page to contain images. I joined so that i could upload but was told that I cannot upload the photo until i have 10 edits and four days for verification. I don't have a page that i can make 10 edits to so i'm hoping you'd be able to upload the photo to his page for me or somehow help me get this photo on his page. Thanks Cole — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.121.249.5 (talk) 20:00, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You can upload it to Wikimedia Commons (a central media repository that Wikipedia uses) without having to wait for autoconfirmation (the 4 days/10 edits requirement). You can log in with the same username and password you created on Wikipedia. Anon126 (talk - contribs) 20:05, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Cannot Log In But

I've been a contributor for over 8 years and been made a Review Editor. Though my user page is there, I cannot log in using Noles1984. There seems to be no way around it. I just need help logging in. This is strange. I maintain several domains and could put up a very temp email address then delete once I get help. Noles1984 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.230.87.100 (talk) 20:28, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

What message are you getting? Please check your edit history and verify that your account has not been compromised (your last edit listed is on 23 January). If you have forgotten your password and you have not registered an e-mail address (which you don't appear to have done) then there is not a lot that can be done unless you have taken the precaution of embedding a committed identity on your user page, which also seems not to have been done. Sorry. Spinning Spark 21:28, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Is that true

Dear Sir, I have received an email showing that I won a Lottery held on 15 Mar. 2014 by SHELL PETROLEUM in Collarboration with shell Petroleum Development Company(SPDC) and BRITISH AMERICAN TOBACCO COMPANY. Where I found at bottom of the email a photo showing your company name and some of admin staff. I will be greatful to receive your kind confirmation to clarify if that event was true. Great regards . Senior Architect <personal info redacted> — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.50.238.67 (talk) 21:44, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is English Wikipedia, and we're in no way affiliated to BAT or Shell Oil - nor are they affiliated with each other, and as far as I know neither company runs lotteries. In any case - if you don't remember entering a lottery, you haven't won anything in one. The email is almost certainly a hoax, to try to get you to disclose banking information that can be used against you. Delete the email, and certainly don't reply to its reply address or follow any instructions in it. AlexTiefling (talk) 21:50, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It's definitely a lottery scam. A Google search showed many examples with those alleged companies. If you reply to the scammers they will try to trick you into paying an advance fee to get your non-existing prize. PrimeHunter (talk) 23:46, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

My post just got delete??

I made a serious post and somebody did just delete it? How do i get all the things back? Becuase it took a long time to make it all. And i really don't understand why it was taking down? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Morten Darving Schlüter (talk • contribs) 23:19, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No, your (very short) list of contributions shows that what you wrote above was the first edit by Morten Darving Schlüter in English-language Wikipedia. -- Hoary (talk) 23:34, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict) This was the first saved edit by your account. The account was created 8 minutes before your post. If this is about an edit made with another account or without logging in then we can only comment if you say which edit or page it was. I see you also posted to User talk:Pixi Uno#My post just got delete?? but User:Pixi Uno has not deleted anything non-trivial in the last month so I'm puzzled. PrimeHunter (talk) 23:38, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The requirements for having an article are that reliably published third party sources have discussed the subject in depth and that the content be presented in a neutral manner. If your work seriously missed meeting those requirements, it could have been quickly cleaned up by deletion from an administrator. In the future it would probably be best to utilize the articles for creation process where an experienced editor can help guide you to creating something that will meet the basic article requirements and not immediately trigger deletion. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 23:48, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Problem with Wikipedia:Emailing users

Previously it worked fine - last time I'd used it in late March.

I'd discovered a problem after a letter I sent, I do not received a copy to my e-mail

In recent days, I'd made several checks with different wiki-users' help.

Result: my messegase not received, including and a copy to my e-mail.

Their messeges I do receive, so something not working for me.

Restore all default settings (in all sections) did not help, the result - the same .

What else can I do?

Thank you,--Igorp_lj (talk) 23:41, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It works for me. Do you get a screen saying "Your e-mail message has been sent"? If "Email me a copy of my message" was selected on the mail form then the copy may have been blocked by a spam filter somewhere, possibly by your mail provider or mail program. It's also possible that the users you tested it with got it blocked by spam filters. Try mailing me with a post saying "Just a test" and nothing else. I just tried that on myself without problems. The more content there is, the bigger risk there may be that a spam filter dislikes something. I have always received Wikipedia mail within seconds when I tested it. PrimeHunter (talk) 23:58, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Editing a page

Hi

I was trying to edit Peter Sellers page. There was a movie missing in the filmography table. I added (The Mouse that Roared) but I believe I missed things up. This is my first time, so I apologize. Please help get the page in the right shape, with the movie I added.

Thank you

Faizlo

[1] "Find War Dead". CWGC. Search parameters: "War=First World War" and "Served With=South African Forces". Retrieved 2014-04-08.

[2] "Find War Dead". CWGC. Search parameters: War="First World War", Served With="South African Forces". Retrieved 2014-04-08.

[1]

[2]

v t e Wikipedia help pages
*Visit the Teahouse* or the Help desk for an interactive Q & A forum. FAQs (?) Reference desks (?) Noticeboards (?) Cheatsheet (?) Directories (?)**
About Wikipedia (?)	Administration Purpose Principles Policies and guidelines What Wikipedia is not Disclaimer (parental advice) Making requests Who writes Wikipedia?
Help for readers (?)	FAQ Books Copyright Glossary Mobile access Navigation Other languages Searching Students Viewing media
Contributing to Wikipedia (?)	Advice for young editors Avoiding common mistakes Etiquette Simplified Manual of Style Simplified rule-set "Ignore all rules" "The rules are principles" Style-tips Tip of the day Your first article (article wizard)
Getting started (?)	Why create an account? Introductions by topic Graphics tutorials Picture tutorial IRC (live chat) tutorial VisualEditor user guide
Dos and don'ts (?)	Accessibility Biographies Biographies (living) Categorization Consensus Discussions Disambiguation Images Leads Links Lists References Tables Titles (of articles)
How-to pages and information pages (?)	Appealing blocks Article deletion Categories Citations/references Referencing for beginners Citation Style 1 Cite errors References and page numbers Convert Diff Editing Minor edit toolbar edit conflict Find sources Files Footnotes Image deletion Infoboxes Linking (link color) Logging in Merging Page name Renaming pages Redirect Passwords Email confirmation Reverting Simple vandalism cleanup Talk pages (archiving simple archiving) User contributions WP search protocol
Coding (?)	Wiki markup Barcharts Calculations Characters Columns Elevation Hidden text HTML Lists Magic words Music symbols Sections Sounds Tables Templates Transclusion URL Visual files
Directories (?)	Abbreviations Contents (Encyclopedia proper) Departments Editor's index Essays FAQs Glossary Guidelines Manual of Style Policies Tasks Tips Tools
Missing Manual Ask for help on your talk page (?)