Talk:The Rolling Bridge
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the The Rolling Bridge article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
Untitled
what does this have to do with what it uses to make the bridge????
Video
I do not believe the video to add to this article...
84.41.232.121 21:08, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
What era?
Article says "For the Victorian-era retractable bridge, see Guthrie rolling bridge" but Guthrie rolling bridge says the type was "an 18th century version of the drawbridge". By the Victorian age fortifications needing drawbridges were out of date. Strikes me "trundling" would have better described the Guthrie type.--SilasW (talk) 19:16, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
Sense or nonsense
Why the hell have they built a moveable bridge crossing a dead-end water way? Crazy folk the limey. I mean which ship is ever gonna pass this way? -- Kays (talk) 22:13, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
Categories:
- Start-Class Bridge and Tunnel articles
- High-importance Bridge and Tunnel articles
- WikiProject Bridges and Tunnels articles
- Unassessed London-related articles
- Low-importance London-related articles
- Start-Class London Transport articles
- Low-importance London Transport articles
- WikiProject London Transport articles
- Unassessed visual arts articles
- Unassessed public art articles
- Public art articles
- WikiProject Visual arts articles