Jump to content

User talk:Ahunt

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Mepaxman (talk | contribs) at 05:54, 23 April 2014 (→Wow! Thanks: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Hover taxiing

G'day from Oz; yesterday I had a look at Taxiing after adding a Pretty Picture (I'm so modest) to the Eurocopter EC120 article of an EC120 hover-taxiing. Leaving aside the overall crappiness of the article, as you can see it only mentions hover taxiing in the context of rotor downwash, but says nothing about what it actually is. I'm sure I could easily write a couple of sentences about it, but I can't find a ref to hang anything from. Do you have something that fits the bill? Cheers YSSYguy (talk) 10:20, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmm, I am sure I have something somewhere, let me check! If so I'll add it there! - Ahunt (talk) 11:41, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Good-oh, ta muchly. YSSYguy (talk) 12:15, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Done I added a section on how it is done to give a flavour for the limitations and techniques involved. Hopefully it is not too much WP:NOTMANUAL. I used your great EC120B photo as well! - Ahunt (talk) 16:40, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Taxiing, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ground effect (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Done - Ahunt (talk) 14:19, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You!

Thank you for helping better my editing capabilities.

I added the link to the Aviation page because glossaries like the one I linked that are that accurate need to be seen by the public view. Maybe there's a better place to reference that glossary for those who don't know much about private Aviation?Theoryofman (talk) 15:07, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your note. Basically no, things like that have no place linked on Wikipedia. - Ahunt (talk) 17:52, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Duly noted. Again, thank you for the help!  :) Theoryofman (talk) 20:24, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

February 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Chromium (web browser) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • If the snapshot passes the automated testing, it is placed in a directory in the root directory].<ref>{{cite web|url=https://storage.googleapis.com/chromium-browser-snapshots/index.html |title=

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:34, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Fixed - Ahunt (talk) 12:43, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please see my last entry on Talk:Aurel Vlaicu. Could you be so kind and allow some gallery photos of Aurel Vlaicu article?

Much obliged!

Simiprof (talk) 15:58, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Answered there! - Ahunt (talk) 16:05, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Userbox request

Could you please make a user box saying something along the lines of "This user supports copyleft licensing", and the copyleft symbol? Felixphew (talk) 01:28, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your request! How does this look? Feel free to edit it, or just list desired changes here!
Code Result
{{User:Ahunt/Copyleft}}
This user prefers and supports Copyleft licensing.
 Usage
- Ahunt (talk) 02:14, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pacific Aviation Museum

I'm working on getting topics related to Ford Island to GA status. I'm meeting with the Pacific Aviation Museum on Friday to gather material to improve the article about them. I see you've had that article on your watchlist and have reverted them a few times. Would you be interested in partnering up with me on this article?--v/r - TP 04:00, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your note. It's all about adding material that is supported by reliable sources! That said, sure I'll be willing to help out improve that article! You post and I'll edit, if you like! - Ahunt (talk) 12:48, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

As I understand you are some kind of a mentor to this user. Please can you talk to Felixphew that barnstars are not to be used this way. You are not suposed to give a barnstar to yourself and you are not suposed to use them this way either. This is not Wikilove but it is mockig. He/she put this on my talk page, but that is not enough, put this weird barnstar here on my userpage. You are not supposed to edit other peoples userpage, and especially not in this way.

Very stubborn such no to Doge in Shiba Inu page. Wow! Felixphew (talk) Ar! Ar! Ar! 01:41, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Also he/she removed one of my comments from a disscussion page. He also edited other peoples edits, here. You are not supposed to edit other peoples edits. And I am further hanged out on his userpage. [1]. I am the certain person, who is hanged out there: I pity you. ... Feel free to use my talk page for the massive flame war that ensues... You are not suppose to make a personal conflict about a discussion. Please talk to him so he removes this from his userpage? Hafspajen (talk) 17:28, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not really mentoring him in any formal sense, but let me have a look at what is going on there and see if I can help at all. - Ahunt (talk) 12:49, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Well I went though the whole history and it looks to me like a bit of an WP:AXE issue combined with perhaps an "English-as-a-second language" problem, too. He seems to have been well warned by other editors so far, but I'll keep an eye on it and see how it all progresses. - Ahunt (talk) 14:57, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
.Thank you, that was very nice of you. Hafspajen (talk) 16:10, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Ahunt (talk) 16:21, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

MATE and Debian

Ahunt should undo the revert or give a better reason. Debian 7 is stable. The summary cites testing (jessie). Thus, it is not Debian 7. 84.127.80.114 (talk) 17:38, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

So what? The nav box addition merely says it is available for Debian, and Mate is available for Debian. It doesn't have to be in Debian stable to be included in the nav box - Ahunt (talk) 21:24, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

MikroKopter

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Paul venter (talk) 18:35, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

LOL - you were the one who reverted rather than discussing as per WP:BRD, but let's move this to the talk page. - Ahunt (talk)

Kestrel JP10

Hi! Received a note regarding Kestrel Aircraft. Please know I have absolutely no idea what I am doing and wish all the help I can get. First of all we need to change the Title page, and any help I can get would be most helpful. KateKestrel20:26, 4 March 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by KateKestrel (talk • contribs)

We should probably take this over to Talk:Kestrel JP10 where you should explain what the problem is. - Ahunt (talk) 21:56, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Allstar SZD-54 Perkoz

Hi. I want to say sorry becouse i deleted your article "Allstar SZD-54-2 Perkoz". It has many mistakes and false data. I hope our specialists will write it again soon. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.253.225.54 (talk) 13:18, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you work for the company then you will want to read WP:COI before you make any edits to this article. The text in that article is all based on reliable sources and all cited. If you work for the company you should make suggestions for changes on the article talk page at Talk:Allstar SZD-54 Perkoz and cite other published sources that show that the sources already referenced are incorrect. - Ahunt (talk) 13:53, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sports userboxes

Ahunt, thanks for your prompt reply and work on splitting the sports user boxes up so that they could be all displayed. Appreciate it! starship.paint (talk | ctrb) 23:14, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, thanks for pointing out that the pages was broken! - Ahunt (talk) 23:31, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Article Aero Designs

Hello. I've restored the redirect for now since the redirect seems to be an alternative spelling of the target article. I'm not exactly sure what you're referring to in the source. Could you point out the exact section you're referring to? Thanks. KJ click here 00:12, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The problem is that there was a well-known company called Aero Designs, but I have turned the redirect into an article on the company now anyway. I'll add a hat note on the other, less well-known company. - Ahunt (talk) 00:19, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Certificate of Registration

I have a non Wikipedia question. What happens if an aircraft is flown when the Certificate of Registration has been cancelled? I did find this but it doesn't say what happens. This happened here several years ago but it was never reported. Thanks. CambridgeBayWeather (talk) 19:17, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, that is a good question! CAR 202.13 says:
202.13 (1) This section does not apply in respect of an aircraft that is
(a) a hang glider; or
(b) a parachute.
(2) Except as otherwise authorized under subsection 202.14(1) or 202.43(1), no person shall operate an aircraft in Canada unless it is registered in Canada, in a contracting state or in a foreign state that has an agreement in force with Canada that allows an aircraft that is registered in that foreign state to be operated in Canada.
and then CAR 103.18 Schedule II lays out the penalty of $5000 for an individual and $25,000 for a corporation for failing to comply.
I hope that helps! - Ahunt (talk) 19:40, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. It looks as if I should have written the aircraft up. Too long ago now. CambridgeBayWeather (talk) 12:08, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The best thing to do is report it to TC enforcement. If it had a Canadian registration painted on it, you can always check the Civil Aircraft Register to see if it has been registered now. - Ahunt (talk) 12:44, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure any more what the ident was. Would have been sometime in 2009/2010 I think. CambridgeBayWeather (talk) 13:05, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, that was a while ago! - Ahunt (talk) 13:13, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Yep. Probably a bit too late now to write it up. CambridgeBayWeather (talk) 10:44, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Ahunt (talk) 10:58, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Textron Aviation

Adam, would you have time to help put together a new article on Textron Aviation, the merger of Cessna and Beechcraft announced today? I can add the infobox, work on article structure, and so on, but writing copy from scratch is my weak point. If you aren't able to help out, I can probably manage to do something over the weekend. Thanks. - BilCat (talk) 00:48, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, no problem! I am happy to help out! It is raining here, so no skiing today, just laundry!! If you want to get it started then I can fill in the text. Here is another ref. - Ahunt (talk) 11:38, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
(TLS Edit) Started the article using the press release, just need some meat adding. MilborneOne (talk) 13:55, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
No problem! I should be able to get to that today! - Ahunt (talk) 14:00, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, Michael! - BilCat (talk) 14:09, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Okay I gave it a kick, see how it looks now: Textron Aviation. - Ahunt (talk) 19:59, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Good work. MilborneOne (talk) 20:02, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Glad you like it - feel free to add or subtract as always! - Ahunt (talk) 20:06, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Looks good to me too. I assume you're still going to correct the first flight dates in the table? It currently vlist them all as 2014. Also, have y'all seen anything on whether the Hawker jets are still to be discontinued? I know that's what was announced in Dec, but that Textron would still provide service for the existing Hawker jets. - BilCat (talk) 20:23, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Well my thinking was that the first flight of the Textron Aviation models of all of them will be 2014, but I have clarified that in the table, by changing "first flight" to "produced from". Hopefully that makes more sense?
The press release seems to imply that the Hawker jets will be produced, as it says "Textron Aviation brings together a unique combination of businesses with class-leading, complementary general aviation products including Citation and Hawker business jets, King Air twin-engine turboprops, Caravan single-engine utility turboprops and a great line up of piston-engine aircraft representing the Cessna and Beechcraft brands." It doesn't sound like they will only be making parts, but perhaps the PR people who wrote the press release misunderstood? As of today the Hawker 400 and 800 are listed on the Beechcraft website as being in production. - Ahunt (talk) 20:30, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I thouht that might have been your thinking, but since all the existing products became TexAv products on the same day, is it necessary at all? Perhaps the actual first flights would more infomative. On the Hawker jets, I noticed that too. We should find out one way or another soon enough. - BilCat (talk) 20:40, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
If you think first flights would be more useful I can change it to show those instead! I agree on the Hawker jets - if the sales copy gets pulled from the website and is replaced, by "for parts" call, then we can remove them from the table too. I just listed each type that the two websites show as in production today, but that can change. - Ahunt (talk) 20:52, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
As far as I can tell, the only Hawkers on the Beechcraft site are the 400XPR and 800XPR, which are upgrades, not new-builds. The upgrade is a "product", but we could clarify that in the type comments column. - BilCat (talk) 20:56, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I looked to see if we had an article on Scott Ernest, the new CEO of TexAv, but we don't. However, there are two deleted pages. Milb1, are either of those relevant or salvageable? Thanks. - BilCat (talk) 21:03, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

They are both attack pages about some unidentified Canadian and not relevant. MilborneOne (talk) 11:07, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks!Thought it might be something like that. - BilCat (talk) 12:42, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The XPRs would be aircraft then that were traded in or returned to the factory and "re-manufactured", so I would still count these as products, personally. - Ahunt (talk) 21:11, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Cubuntu

Hello, do you want read Cubuntu ? Thank you. --Ideefixe (talk) 15:28, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

First I have ever heard of the article of the distro. That needs some work, though! I may get to it over the weekend.- Ahunt (talk) 22:25, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
You know what, having checked it, it is a non-notable distro. WP:PROD. - Ahunt (talk) 22:26, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Your proposed for deletion is removed by anonymous --Ideefixe (talk) 22:07, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, thanks for your note. Yeah I see that. It is very marginal for notability at this point with really only one third party ref worth mentioning, but I am inclined to not send it to AfD at this point and wait and see. What do you think? It certainly needs a complete rewrite into English if we are going to keep it! - Ahunt (talk) 22:22, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, thank you for your reply. In my opinion this developer uses wikipedia for promotional purposes. Thank you for your patience with him.--Ideefixe (talk) 23:00, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah I agree, it did look pretty promotional, as well as "English-challenged". I have re-written it, see what you think: Cubuntu. - Ahunt (talk) 00:40, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Good work. thank you very much. --Ideefixe (talk) 18:54, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I am glad that you think the work we have all done there has helped! I think it is looking much more like a proper encyclopedia article now! There are still a few things that need referencing, like the number of users, but it is coming along! - Ahunt (talk) 21:18, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar
I award you this barnstar for thanking me for my edits to that Amnesty International userbox. Feel free to add the userbox to your user page! Mr*|(60nna) 00:25, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! Glad that was helpful! - Ahunt (talk) 00:26, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Mechanisms and Cumulative Effects of aviation on Climate

The article has been broadly quoted, where the referenced contribution of aviation Carbon emmissions was pegged at 2% (two percent) This data was from 1992... Worse, the data point was being referenced as a current statistic, and cited as rationale for it being relatively unimportant or immaterial how much people travel by air etc. etc.

My reason for not following the protocol was to deliberately call attention to this.

The true estimated range, I found after some extensive research is estimated that Aviation makes a 7-9% contribution to global warming.

Already this update is making a difference.My hope is that we can judiciously adhere to the rules, in a way that best communicates. I hope you agree. I'm not sure I would remove the call for an update, or at least some note to advise people that there was a big gap.

Also, the diagram on this page obsfucates the data with irrrelevant complexities so as to render it unintelligible. (humor here)

I may try to find a better alternative for the representation of the data.

Cheers. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DShantz (talk • contribs) 01:38, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

That that is all no problem, you can add a tag or fix it, but in general we don't put comments in articles as a matter of policy. - Ahunt (talk) 12:10, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

general queries

Hi Ahunt,

how do I find out who the moderator and administrator of a page is? for me, it feels easier to mail some content to a moderator for review. (even if it sounds old school). we last chatted back in 2011 after an update to "Earthstar odyssey" which thou corrected

eg, i'd like to add to the Detoxification page; with a thought about how Vipassanā may be considered as a scientifically proven detox method. to summarise, 10days of silence with simple food, in a center surrounded by woods, eyes closed most of the day in the lotus position; it is well known to help the mind let go off cravings; addictions like alcohol, smoking and worse habits

also, this "\[\[" . . "\]\]" thing seems to be needlessly repetitive, like user:a|a or is that an ell in between; or user "talk":a|"talk"; and then an ios keypad needs two shifts for an |(or symbol) and [s

42.104.25.165 (talk) 07:45, 5 April 2014 (UTC)rahul.chou[reply]

Hi, thank you for your questions. There are no administrators or moderators for Wikipedia article pages. Each page is just written by people interested in that subject and it is intentionally non-hierarchical. Everyone contributes on a equal basis and conflicts are resolved on the the article talk page by discussion and consensus. It actually works!
I would suggest just add the text you think should be on the page as explained at WP:BOLD and make sure you cite your sources (add refs) and then see if anyone changes it or objects. As per WP:BRD, if they do then you take the discussion to the talk page to negotiate.
You can note that other editors will take you more seriously if you open an account and edit from that rather than as an IP address. It just lets people know who you are and that you are seriously here to help build the encyclopedia.
As far as the page coding goes, it can be a problem if you don't have a regular keyboard on your computer (phone, tablet). You can always suggest text on the talk page and let someone else insert it and format it, or just put it on the article page as best you can and other editors will usually come along and fix any errors. It's all collaborative. - Ahunt (talk) 11:42, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the help. - Rahul.chou (talk)

Revert on Antivirus software page

Hi Ahunt. Sure, the refs only mention Windows, but it is obvious that this could also easily happen on any other OS, or happen to other software packages. Heck, that section itself mentions MSE nuking Chrome; if that's of your company software, you're screwed. I think wording this to specifically mention Windows and nothing else is disingenuous, hence why I changed this. --DanielPharos (talk) 12:32, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Well I have no connection to Windows, haven't used it in years, but it seems to me that taking two refs showing instances of antivirus corrupting Windows installations and generalizing that to all operating systems is not supportable. MSE removing Google Chrome was in Windows, though. I have been running antivirus on Linux for years and never seen an issue like this or even heard of one. Linux file systems are very different from Windows ones and I suspect not as susceptible to this problem, which is probably why I have never seen an instance of it. As per WP:V, all claims need to be supported, so to make the statement that this applies to all operating systems, you would need to provide at least one ref that indicates that this is the case. - Ahunt (talk) 12:39, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
"Not susceptible"...! Of course they are! Whenever a program deletes a file, that file is deleted. If that file happens to be critical to system operation, the system stop to operate (possibly only when trying to reboot, sure). It's really that straight forward. I can *manually* ruin a Linux install by deleting files (as root, I grant you that), so why wouldn't an antivirus suite be able to do that? The fact we both know of no case where this has happened doesn't mean it's impossible. (In fact, Windows has the ability to possibly recover from such an event with System Restore, but most Linux distro's don't have something like that in place, to the best of my knowledge.)
But I think I may have found a way to re-order the section to keep us both happy. Hold on... :) --DanielPharos (talk) 12:50, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
There. Hopefully this is better? --DanielPharos (talk) 13:00, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, and I just found this: http://forums.avg.com/us-en/avg-forums?sec=thread&act=show&id=240962&type=0 I won't add it as a ref (since it's just a forum post), but it appears to be a confirmed case of AVG trying to delete a critical Android file. --DanielPharos (talk) 13:02, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
That forum post actually brings up a good point. Many Windows antivirus programs automatically remove the offending file, which is what causes all the problems in "Windows false positive" cases, as cited. This Android case with AVG for Linux (which I have run) is similar to my own running of ClamAV on Linux. Occasionally you will get a false positive, but there are no Linux antivirus programs that I know of that automatically remove files. Both AVG for Linux and ClamAV just flag the file and nothing more, so there is never any harm done by a false positive. On Linux you can do this because real Linux viruses are so hard to find, download and install that, as in my experience, almost all flags are false positives. This actually very much strengthens the case that automatically removing false positives and disabling the operating system or applications is strictly a Windows problem and explains why all the refs are for Windows events only. I notice you have removed the reference to Windows again. I think based on all this evidence that it should be noted that this is a Windows-only occurrence - Ahunt (talk) 13:27, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
(Many Windows antimalware suites can be configured to delete files either, or ask what action to perform.)
I just don't agree explicitly mentioning Windows in this context, when the problem is fundamentally not tied to a specific OS, or any OS at all. It's not "strictly a Windows problem". Even if in practice this has never happened on any other OS, this still doesn't excuse the unjust targeting. That the problem hasn't happened elsewhere doesn't mean the problem doesn't exist. Noting that this is "a Windows-only occurrence" can only be done if it's made clear that this is not a fundamentally Windows-only problem, and that in practice there are only confirmed cases on Windows. Which to me feels like original research, and unnecessary detail.
Here's a question: why should we mention the only cases that we can find refs for are Windows-only? Fundamentally this isn't a Windows-only problem (I think you agree with me on this; this *could* easily happen elsewhere), so why is it important to note that in practice this has only happened on Windows so far?
In fact, part of my argument is that this isn't even an purely OS issue at all! If antimalware suites started deleting installed office suites, the same text applies. So in fact, why mention any OS at all? (Hence my "critical software infrastructure" wording.) --DanielPharos (talk) 13:42, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, I just read your edit to the page. I can live with that. :) --DanielPharos (talk) 13:43, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oh good! Collaboration works! If I can find a report of another operating system that has had false positive files removed I'll certainly add that. - Ahunt (talk) 13:56, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Rotorway International Logo.png

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Rotorway International Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Diannaa (talk) 01:28, 16 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: it has been replaced with a newer image and so can be deleted. - Ahunt (talk) 15:44, 17 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:CF100Crest.JPG or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:17, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wow! Thanks

I see that you have a page called Paxman Viper. Thank you! The viper is my dads plane. He and my grandpa designed, built, test flew, rebuilt, and flew again many times over. It's great to see that his work is on the internet. He has been out of the business for sometime now but when I get my pilots license we will get things going again. Again thank you for the recognition! -Mepaxman

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Ahunt&oldid=605410770"