Talk:Taseko Mountain

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Canada: British Columbia / Geography Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject British Columbia.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Geography of Canada.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Mountains Low‑importance

	Mountains portal This article is part of WikiProject Mountains, a project to systematically present information on mountains. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page (see Contributing FAQ for more information), or visit the project page where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.MountainsWikipedia:WikiProject MountainsTemplate:WikiProject MountainsMountain
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Geography Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Geography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of geography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GeographyWikipedia:WikiProject GeographyTemplate:WikiProject Geographygeography

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Geography To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : See Requested articles/Social sciences/Geography, cities, regions and named places and Missing articles about Locations
Assess : Tag related article talk pages with {{WikiProject Geography}}. To help assess the quality and importance of geography articles, please see: Unassessed geography articles and Unknown-importance geography articles.
Cleanup : See Geography articles needing attention
Deletion sorting : Listed at Geographic related deletion discussions
Geographical coordinates : See Articles missing geocoordinate data by country
Infobox : See Geography articles needing infoboxes
Map : See Wikipedia requested maps
Notability : See Geography articles with topics of unclear notability
Photo : See Wikipedia requested photographs of places
Stubs : See Geography stubs

It is requested that an image or photograph of Taseko Mountain be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Coordinates

I just started my work here (I've been doing a lot of editing in the Chilcotin area lately) & the first thing that I realized need to be worked on (aside from the references which I fixed in a heartbeat with pleasure [& sugar on top :P]) was the coordinates. I figured this out when I was looking for the mountain on Google Earth; I typed in "Taseko Mountain" & it took me to... pretty much nowhere... some logging road about 13 kn northeast of Fish Lake. In any case, the coordinates of 51°32′00″N 123°28′18″W / 51.53333°N 123.47167°W / 51.53333; -123.47167 did NOT take me to Taseko Mountain & are obviously incorrect. No worries though; using a topo map I found where the summit really is & now have the correct coordinates (51°14′00″N 123°28′25″W / 51.23333°N 123.47361°W / 51.23333; -123.47361). I will add them in. Surely coordinates that far off didn't come off BCGNIS, did they? Okay, maybe they just screwed up big time on that one; everyone screws up royally now & then. :)

By the way, it's pretty cool (I think) that this mountain & Mount Tatlow have the exact same elevation. Obviously it's just a coincidence; it's not like someone took a (giant) level or ruler to their peaks, but still, that's pretty sweet. :P

On a side note, speaking of Tatlow, I did a google search on it & there is not a lot of stuff about the climbing routes to the summit. I think there is something the local first nations people in the area set up so that people weren't constantly climbing around the peak (I think it is the same with other peaks in the area as well) but honestly, you'd think there would be something on the climbing routes (I'd love to climb it one day; it's such an awesome looking & prominent peak). You would expect a mountain that turns as many heads as Tatlow would attract climbers & as a result you would think details on climbing it would be easy to find on the Net, but this is obviously not the case with Tatlow.

Anyway, those were just a few thoughts. Feel free to leave a reply to this if you want; I'll happily converse with you; this area of BC interests me greatly. :) AndrewEnns (talk) 06:58, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tatlow is off-limits to climbers by edict of the Xeni Gwet'in and I believe it's in the enacting legislation for Tsi?los Provincial Park which contains it.....Taseko Mtn, on the other hand, is just really remote and hard to get to, with no nearby road access (unlike Tatlow, which is immediately above Nemaiah Valley; the roads into Big Creek Provincial Park or into the upper end of the Tyaughton/Relay Creek valleys from the south fall short of it quite a bit, with tough country/ridges in between..... That's why there's not much in the way of climbing reports - is there nothing in bivouac.com? (I'd think there would be...).Skookum1 (talk) 18:45, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]