User talk:Smalljim

How to use talk pages: (guidelines from Template:User talk top)

Please continue any conversation where it was started.

Thus if I have left a message on your talk page please DO NOT post a reply here.

I will have your talk page on watch and will note when you have replied.

If you want to initiate a conversation, please create a new heading here.

Continue existing conversations under existing headings.

Create a new heading if the original conversation is archived.

Indent your comments when replying by using an appropriate number of colons ':'.
Sign your comments automatically using ~~~~.

JSTOR Survey (and an update)

Hi! Just a quick update that while JSTOR and The Wikipedia Library discuss expanding the partnership, they've gone ahead and extended the pilot access again, until May 31st. Thanks, JSTOR!

It would be really helpful for growing the program if you would fill out this short survey about your usage and experience with JSTOR:

SURVEY

Cheers, Ocaasi via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:47, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done. —SMALL JIM 10:53, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Recent sock accounts

I think you missed one of the accounts you were blocking earlier: I love creating accounts (don't want to link). Cheers. EvergreenFir (talk) 00:24, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, done. —SMALL JIM 15:16, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

tooth extraction

not sure if I messed something up. I've got tooth extraction in the article Dental implant and saw it was red. Thought I'd missed something and created the redirect page - not sure what your plan was but I did this before seeing the deletion log. Ian Furst (talk) 03:57, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No it's my fault. I dealt with User:Lesion's deletion request without giving it the attention it needed - in particular failing to notice that the request had already been turned down. I apologise for the inconvenience. If you're reading this, Lesion, you need to start a WP:RM process as explained by the message you removed – it's obviously not an uncontroversial change. —SMALL JIM 09:00, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've got no concerns about the deletion (I also believe it's uncontroversial, just a house-keeping item, Lesion and I do a lot of the work on dental articles), I was just concerned I'd overridden something beyond my WP skill-set. I can change the link in the article or leave it as a REDIRECT. Doesn't matter to me. Ian Furst (talk) 10:27, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, ok. In that case since I have no opinion on the matter, we're just left with Courcelles' refusal of Lesion's first request: "Speedy deletion declined. This might be contentious enough to use WP:RM protocols." Since there's no rush, if you jointly decide you do want the move it's best if one of you does a WP:RM just to be sure. Best, —SMALL JIM 10:47, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I note with some amusement that tooth extraction is yet again not deleted. Where is this contention? Also, Smalljim, I resent the implication that I am trying to hide something by deleting a message on my user page which is clearly marked as inactive. I left a msg on Courcelles' talk page, which went unanswered, presumably because of lack of availability, although other admins (Kww) are clearly not above ignoring summons. Apparently they feel they are too important and their decisions are above any questioning from the community. Fair enough, as if we needed any more evidence that most admins are just on a power trip and log on here only to get their fix of bullying in compensation for a dissatisfaction with their place and position in the real world. Hence I nominated the redirect page again. In absence of any objection, I fail to see why the redirect is not deleted. Lesion 19:29, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I could explain fully, but you give me the impression that I would be wasting my time. Instead I'll just say that if you don't want to go to an RM, just nominate it again. Refer to this discussion and any others, and hopefully the third admin will do the right thing :) —SMALL JIM 20:04, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Northern Blossoms Honey was deleted

Yes I'm new to Wiki but I believe I have some knowledge of early beekeeping in Saskatchewan, Canada. My grandfather came here in 1910 & was instrumental in founding the Saskatchewan Beekeepers Association, The Saskatchewan Honey Coop & the Saskatchewan Honey Marketing Board. Many imigrants to SK were familiar with beekeeping one or 2 hives in their homeland, however SK offered opportunity for great yields of honey, if one could survive winters of -45 C. I would welcome the opportunity to work on this article. Could you send back the article with the objectional material in red or deleted? Rob 198.167.167.254 (talk) 05:56, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You're referring to History of "Northern Blossoms" Honey which I deleted, on request, on 30 March. There were two reasons for the deletion: firstly it was copied directly from http://www.hamiltonhoney.ca/history.html, which makes it a potential copyright violation. There is a process to go through to have such material accepted (but that wouldn't be relevant now). Secondly, there was no indication that the subject of the article was notable enough for inclusion here. There's a third issue, too: if you are involved with the company in some way, you must carefully consider our policy on conflict of interest. It's always best if someone who is completely uninvolved writes our articles about companies etc.

However, having said all that, there is potential for the addition of some general information about beekeeping in Canada: I see that we already have articles on Beekeeping in the United States as well as in some other countries: see Category:Beekeeping by country. If you want to write about this, you'll first need to assemble some reference material from reliable sources. The best way to start would be with our guide "Your first article". It used to be easy to write for Wikipedia and have your articles 'stick' - these days it's not so easy, I'm afraid. Let me know if I can help further. —SMALL JIM 22:51, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Or, for something simpler, you could add a general sentence or two to Saskatchewan#Economy, along the lines of what's in Alberta#Agriculture and forestry. But you'd still need to reference it properly if you want to be sure it'll stick. —SMALL JIM 23:11, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

50.240.235.141

Hey Smalljim, 50.240.235.141 is at it again with the addition of non-existent Category:Television series created by Doug Langdale here. And the re-submission of blocks of unsourced content in spite of your push to start the article from scratch here. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:34, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the note. I've given a three month block. I don't think anything he's added can be trusted, so I'll revert the lot. —SMALL JIM 18:55, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks mang. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 20:43, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unapproved bot

Hello Smalljim, I am messaging you because of a situation that needs attention and I see that you are active. User:Pyfisch, who has made very few edits, seems to be testing a bot, User:FischBot, which has caused incorrect category changes. The user has reverted the changes, so we can AGF, but I can find no record of a bot approval request. Can I ask you to look into it? Since I did not know what forum the issue should be reported to for a speedy reply, please forgive me taking the liberty of asking you personally. Thank you, BethNaught (talk) 18:28, 17 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

BethNaught - a quick learning curve there! I've read up on it and put a message on his talk page. —SMALL JIM 18:47, 17 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks. I appreciate the time you put into it. BethNaught (talk) 18:51, 17 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ASSERT

Hey Smalljim, I tried to PING you, but not sure if it worked as the first time I used all uppercase and it didn't link you. I fixed it, but not sure if that actually notified you or just fixed the hyperlink. So this is just a notification in case the ping failed. I took your suggestion and just made the change, since I felt that most in the discussion thought the proposed text was better. But we do have some contested points that I'd like to get your input on if you can spare the time. Thanks Morphh ^(talk) 01:49, 18 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

OK. I've replied briefly over there. —SMALL JIM 12:51, 18 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

Thanks for helping out with vandalism!

Piguy101 (talk) 21:37, 18 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Removed Edit Summary

GreenEveningSky put a nasty edit summary on my userpage. Could you please remove it? Thanks Piguy101 (talk) 21:44, 18 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Piguy101 - I think nthep has done that for you. Thanks for the kitty - you deserve one too! Best, —SMALL JIM 22:01, 18 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Tushawn1337

Hello, I am just letting you know that this user has recently created inappropriate and attack pages again. I have reported this user @ WP:AIV. I think this user should be blocked without any further notice ! A.Minkowiski^{_Lets t@lk} 09:07, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

All done. —SMALL JIM

deleted postings

why do you keep deleting posting. this is not vandalism these are facts that are verifiable — Preceding unsigned comment added by LonelySailor (talk • contribs) 16:16, 20 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

i am trying to post verifiable facts to wikipedia and you keep deleting them? why these are trues verifiable facts on android tv and androidtv.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by LonelySailor (talk • contribs) 16:18, 20 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've replied on the user's talk page. —SMALL JIM 16:20, 20 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I don't have a user page where did you reply — Preceding unsigned comment added by LonelySailor (talk • contribs) 16:42, 20 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sigh: User talk:LonelySailor —SMALL JIM 16:52, 20 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of article on First Attorney Consultants, Ltd.

Hi Smalljim, After noticing your deletion of my article on April 21, 2014, I edited the article yesterday to add content explaining significance. The edited article is not showing up, and I am not sure if that is because it was deleted again or because of normal delays in processing approval of articles. Any help in resolving this would be greatly appreciated.

Joefacl (talk) 15:12, 24 April 2014 (UTC) Thank you, JoeFacl[reply]

Joe, setting aside the reasons for the second deletion of the article (as First attorney consultants) for a moment, the important question you should be considering is why you want there to be an article on this company on Wikipedia. Your username suggests a relationship with the company, so I've put our standard message about conflict of interest on your talk page. Regarding the article, you've done the right thing by requesting its undeletion.

If that undeletion request is unsuccessful and if, after carefully considering all the aspects, you really think that you should write an article on this company for Wikipedia, then I'd suggest that you submit it via the Articles for Creation process. However, there are plenty of other useful things you can do here if you want to help. For instance you could have a look at Category:Law firms of the United States and see if you could improve any of the existing articles there. Hope this helps, —SMALL JIM 16:10, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Create an Article with a Unconstructive filter

Hi SmallJim, I have written an article on a notable actor, on completion that article could not save page. I have written for a removal unconstructive so I can complete my page. The article code is 52, is there any way you can unfiltered the person name of my article ??!! It would mostly grateful, if we could work together. Maz132 (talk) 09:04, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you really want to help Wikipedia I suggest you do something else. Why not have a look at Category:Actor stubs and see if you can improve any of the existing articles there? —SMALL JIM 09:35, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

Still pending clear evidence...

	The Barnstar of Diplomacy
	Thank you for getting rid of vandalism, I do wonder though. How do you observe so many people all the time? Jebshark (talk) 17:17, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It's kind of you, but I think you should make some useful edits to the encyclopedia to show that you're here in good faith before I can accept this barnstar. —SMALL JIM 17:27, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Human behavior

Now you see my behavior, you physics, but you no psychiatrist. If i Do I look for you than madman, you do no mistake, Iam really madman and i was many times in mental asylum. My diagnoze is Autism mixed with Schizophrenia. Bye.D≈≈Toma646 (talk) 23:02, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

And what your diagnoze?--Hranečník (talk) 10:45, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive Editing...

I am very interested in the popular music genre pages on Wikipedia, but have recently noticed some disruption. Two editors were recently banned - Pulum34 and Andrewbf for making (very similar) unsourced edits and refusal to communicate, but a third editor, also making very similar edits (I have compared the edit histories of the three) is now causing similar problems. I do not know if they are all one and the same editor, but the pages concentrated on and types of edit made are strikingly similar. The latest editor is called Laratadelaciudad. I have tried to communicate with him/her on the relevant Talk page, but the editor blanked the page after my first attempt. I have tried again, so far with no response. Some of the edits seem OK, but the ones made to, for instance, the Acid House page, are not I believe within Wikipedia guidelines. I would say the same about many others. I hate to contact you about this, but I think Wikipedia is a very special resource, very much "The People's Encyclopedia", and disruption like this does it no good at all. I would be grateful if you could look into the matter. Thank you.

UPDATE: I have now had some communication from the editor Laratadelaciudad and a positive discussion may be underway. I would be glad if you would monitor the situation if you have the time.

(86.131.95.227 (talk) 00:18, 28 April 2014 (UTC))[reply]

Thanks for your help here, I'm pleased that you managed to extract a response from this editor, whether it's the same person or not (he/she seems to be more communicative than the others). I'll keep an eye on this, and feel free to alert me to any similar egregious examples you come across. —SMALL JIM 09:48, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

I think this was a good application of IAR to the principal that one does not change another editor's post. Thanks for the correction. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 16:52, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm glad you spotted it. I did waver for a while, but plumped for not bothering you with it since it seemed to fit IAR perfectly. —SMALL JIM 17:00, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A beer for you!

Thanks for the quick block of the George Blake vandal. Enjoy!! (p.s. I also remember black and white television!!!!) Denisarona (talk) 10:46, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

TVM! And thanks for all your work here too – it's good to demonstrate that us older Wikipedians can still be useful :) —SMALL JIM 10:56, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) I actually remember the first time I ever saw a colour television. It was Rowan & Martin's Laugh-In. Does that date me, or what? — Preceding unsigned comment added by JamesBWatson (talk • contribs) 21:30, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

"Veeery interesting... but shtupid" – how did you know it was a colour TV? —SMALL JIM 21:49, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I had always thought that part of the humour was that, while many of the cast did totally crazy things, Rowan & Martin were presented as a pair of very conventional men, conservatively dressed in grey suits somewhat dead-pan in their presentation, in a way rather like a pair of straight men to set off against the rest of the cast's craziness (even though no one could really call Dicky Martin a "straight man"). All of a sudden I found that their suits were in fact bright green and red, and then in the next scene bright yellow and blue, and so on. Suddenly, the whole character of the humour changed. Later, when I went back to seeing it at home, on my family's black & white set, it kept the new, zanier type of humour for me, even though I could no longer see the thing which was responsible for defining the humour in that way. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 10:08, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nah - those suits would have been the result of NTSC :) I probably never saw it in colour, and I really only have vague memories of the show, such as that German behind the potted palms and those little doors that they all kept popping out of – though I can't even be sure I'm not remembering seeing later excerpts. I suppose there are extracts on YouTube: I wonder how its American humour holds up today compared to Python. Or Round the Horne. —SMALL JIM 23:19, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

sorry mate

sorry mate. didnt know what the edit thing was. It wont happen again mate. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.66.195.20 (talk) 17:12, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Back in February, I guess. Glad to hear you've reformed and I don't need to keep an eye out for you :) —SMALL JIM 23:18, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have the evidence, please contact me and please do not remove the underlined words.

It is part and parcel of it and I have discovered that what Hitler was using to build his missiles was actual Indian Technology which predates back to the year 110 000 BCE. ALso to note: the first airplane was inverted in India but the British did not disclose it, for further clarification contact me Jiji — Preceding unsigned comment added by JijL2341 (talk • contribs) 09:35, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but Wikipedia isn't going to include what you think, unless you can verify it in a reliable source. I've added a standard message to your talk page which explains this principle. Please ensure you read and understand it before you consider adding anything else to the encyclopedia. —SMALL JIM 09:41, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Catching a particularly grotesque vandalism on my talk page. Much love <3 ♥ Solarra ♥ ^{♪ Talk ♪} ߷ _{♀ Contribs ♀} 13:45, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Glad to help. Some people, eh! —SMALL JIM 13:49, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

hello...w.r.t. vaibhav maloo

You are getting behavioral based on your judgement of my proximity, I am a fan, thats all. And, why have you gone and removed all articles, I was collecting and adding them all up. I have a full time job, this is not my work. I just don't understand, if you dont think he is important, you can remove but what kind of tactic is this? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.150.19.3 (talk) 04:01, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'd be interested to hear your reasons for blanking the Articles for Deletion page just before the article was re-created by User:Businessworld2013. —SMALL JIM 10:49, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Joseph Michael Levry/Naam Yoga/Universal Kabbalah

Dear Smalljim,

I see you took down 3 pages that took 9 hours yesterday of trying to make things neutral and cite correctly. I understand your points and am fine with the Universal Kabbalah page being down for now. Joseph Michael Levry and Naam Yoga was up for several hours yesterday. Can you put them back up without the Universal Kabbalah link? Or can you put them back in a draft form so I don't have to recreate all the work done yesterday and change what you believe I should change?

Thanks so much.

With best regards,

Robert — Preceding unsigned comment added by Robert Mirshak (talk • contribs) 16:45, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Robert. I'm sorry, but your additions to those articles were very far from neutral and encyclopedic. I appreciate that this is probably your first attempt at writing for Wikipedia, but you need to understand our house style. Our articles are written from the point of view of an intelligent, interested but unbiased observer – see our policy on Neutral point of view. Our other rules are summarised at WP:5. Have a look at some of our good articles too – Yoga is a relevant article that demonstrates our house style well.

I assume that you've read and understood the guidance about conflict of interest that I posted on your talk page, but that you've decided to have another go anyway. You can retrieve your additions to Joseph Michael Levry and Naam yoga from the page history (link at the top of each page), but please don't try to reinstate them without extensive re-working, because they will just get removed again by another editor. It may be best to make your proposed changes to a copy of the page stored in your user space, and then ask for opinions from other interested editors – WikiProject Yoga would appear to be appropriate. Oh, and in case it's relevant - stick to using one account! Hope this helps, —SMALL JIM 22:11, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

1abacada socks

Hi Jim. Just letting you know that I've restored the tags on a couple of 1abacada sock userpages that you deleted - to my mind it's preferable to keep the pages as a record in order to populate Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of 1abacada. If you disagree, I won't restore any more that you delete. All the best, Yunshui ^雲 _水 12:05, 12 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Difficult issue, I admit, Yunshui, but I had a short offline discussion with DoRD yesterday and he agreed with my suggestion that we should delete any pages that the vandal had tagged himself, in accordance with WP:DENY. I'm keeping a list of them all, in case it helps. —SMALL JIM 12:10, 12 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I never get the memos... Okay; my hands are back in my pockets where they belong. Cheers, Yunshui ^雲 _水 12:13, 12 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Well you couldn't have known, and I'm a newbie in dealing with socks and therefore it's not impossible that I'll make a few c*ck-ups. So thanks for the note – do keep an eye on me! Best, —SMALL JIM 12:24, 12 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

One thought, though - in most of these cases, the self-tagging sock has removed a pre-existing sockpuppet tag. What's the rationale for deleting the page entirely, and not simply reverting to the previous tag? Yunshui ^雲 _水 12:37, 12 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

OK I'll go through and look for these - I did check the page histories, so there'll not be many. —SMALL JIM 12:42, 12 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It just occurred to me that I'm saying, "most of these cases" when in fact the only ones I've seen are those which I've edited myself (my watchlist is set to pick up any pages that I edit). So whilst "most of the cases I've seen" have that issue, most probably do not. If you want, I'll fix them myself; easier for me to find them than it is for you, especially if you've done a lot of them recently. Yunshui ^雲 _水 12:48, 12 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

There was only one left on my list; think that's all of them sorted now. Sorry for the additional workload! Yunshui ^雲 _水 12:51, 12 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You just pipped me to that one too! But there is one more that I'll reinstate. —SMALL JIM 12:53, 12 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Tagging provides useful information to those unfamiliar with the case. For example, 1abacada is not unique in his behavior, and his socks shouldn't be confused with someone's else (some socks share the same IP range). His socks normally need a global block, as he is mostly active on Chinese wikis, but stewards won't know local CU results (not all his socks are listed in his CU investigation page). Finally, we need to know the severity of abuse when rangeblocking. Currently I would tolerate his trolling because his IP ranges are wide, and there are a few good users there, but this balance might change to blocks and granting block exemptions. Materialscientist (talk) 22:29, 15 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the info. I'll think on this and perhaps reply later, though reading between the lines it sounds as if with each of his outbursts he's digging his own grave a little deeper. —SMALL JIM 23:17, 15 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Might need...

... a range block . - DVdm (talk) 10:43, 15 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks - I'm not really sure it's worth it at present - and I hate working them out ;-) —SMALL JIM 11:12, 15 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Complaint

Hellow how are you?.. Thank you for stopping the attacking than done by user:Ich Pilot, user:Ich Pilot had made many of new Contributions, which are not based on sources or selecting the sources that are compatible with his couches, I asked him (user:Ich Pilot) to discussed before making any changes to find a common solution (especially that there are many different Statistics which gives different data), and I brought a variety of sources in order to debate, and I asked him to debate before doing any modification until we get to the result of inappropriate but he refuses to debate and even attack me. here is example for one of his personal attacks: by user:B88 attack my personal page and putting pictures calling me fascists and another picture as: If Jesus came kill him again!. he still doing Personal attack directed for me: using low level of word, using low level of word in my Arabic page here you can also see some of assaults on multiple articles as here, and here

I'll be grateful if you can stop that harassment, and Thank you and Have a nice day.--Jobas (talk) 23:28, 15 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Well I'm only an admin here on en.wikipedia, I haven't been involved with User:Ich Pilot at all. But I'll keep an eye on your user pages here for a while and will revert/warn/block anyone who vandalises them. —SMALL JIM 09:15, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for responding. How I can be in touch with admins in wikicommons?--Jobas (talk) 10:16, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

On Commons, you should post requests for admin help to Commons:Administrators' noticeboard. —SMALL JIM 14:47, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Have a nice day.--Jobas (talk) 16:14, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Bruno Carlucci

Hello Smalljim, I noticed you were the last person to delete Bruno Carlucci after repeated joke attempts to create the article. I, however, went about and created a real article. The article seems to be blocked somehow since I cannot create it. I would be very grateful if you could help me with this issue. My article can be found here: User:FredericL/Bruno Carlucci --FredericL (talk) 03:12, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

FredericL, yes that looks like a nice little article you've written there. My only concern is Notability: Carlucci doesn't seem to have been the subject of "significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources which are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject", as is required by our notability guidelines (see WP:BASIC). I'd suggest you work on that aspect and then submit the draft via the Articles for creation process. If/when it's accepted, any admin can override the salt and move the page into article space. —SMALL JIM 09:33, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not Happy With Your Judgement, Please Improve Yourself

You need to learn a thing or two about Wikipedia. I have been on this site before you knew of it and have edited many articles under many avatars which I have lost track of. Stop messing with real articles, sabotage the one's that deserve it only please. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kryptonite1234 (talk • contribs) 20:33, 17 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Bagpuss

Extend PC time? --George Ho (talk) 04:04, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the prompt. It may not be necessary, I'll see what happens for a while first. —SMALL JIM 10:01, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

AEL Limassol

Smalljim I want to thank you for the edits and corrections you made in AEL Limassol article. Also how can I report to wikipedia for vandalism actions for the users below?

(AelLagoudaki,Kitrinos Lagos,APOLLON LEMESOS OPADISMOS) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aelcfc (talk • contribs) 16:44, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

We all have to put up with vandalism at times, it's a consequence of the way Wikipedia is set up. We have a policy page that explains all about it – the section entitled How to respond to vandalism should tell you all you need to know. Hope this helps, —SMALL JIM 19:40, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

What?

what was that for??????????????????????