User talk:Bittergrey

My Talk Archives CAMH_Promotion

This page has archives. Sections older than 14 days may be automatically archived by .

Hello, Bittergrey. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Old history...

This user is asking that his block be reviewed:

Bittergrey (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I believe the indef block, now two years old, was and is unnecessary.

I've never been blocked before. Not even once. No priors. Excluding one act of WP:KETTLE, I haven't even been reported to AN3.
The blocking admin gave no warning regarding disruptive editing, just an indef block.
At ANI the reason he gave for the block was "BLP"[1]. This contradicts to reason given here ("disruptive editing"[2]).
BLP@ANI was irrelevant: The "damaging" text was on ANI only because the LP put it there himself, along with additional copies from his supporters[3]. This suggests they were just crying "BLP".
The blocking admin hasn't responded to recent messages, and is no longer an admin[4]. His most recent RFA was declined("...too disruptive.").

Of course, all of that is old history now. It has been three years since I've been able to make meaningful edits to wikipedia. I've been blocked for two. BitterGrey (talk) 14:40, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I believe the indef block, now two years old, was and is unnecessary. 

# I've never been blocked before.  Not even once.  No priors.  Excluding one act of WP:KETTLE, I haven't even been reported to AN3.
# The blocking admin gave no warning regarding disruptive editing, just an indef block.
# At ANI the reason he gave for the block was "BLP"[https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents&diff=prev&oldid=504937814].  This contradicts to reason given here ("disruptive editing"[https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Bittergrey&diff=prev&oldid=504937446]).   
#BLP@ANI was irrelevant:  The "damaging" text was on ANI only because the LP [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents&diff=prev&oldid=504683273 put it there himself], along with additional copies from his supporters[https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents&diff=504756581&oldid=504755309].  This suggests they were just [[Wikipedia:Crying_"BLP!"|crying "BLP"]]. 
#The blocking admin hasn't responded to recent messages, and is no longer an admin[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/SarekOfVulcan_3].  His most recent RFA was declined([http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Doncram/Proposed_decision#SarekOfVulcan_desysopped "...too disruptive."]).

Of course, all of that is old history now.  It has been three years since I've been able to make meaningful edits to wikipedia.  I've been blocked for two. [[User:Bittergrey|BitterGrey]] ([[User talk:Bittergrey#top|talk]]) 14:40, 26 May 2014 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I believe the indef block, now two years old, was and is unnecessary. 

# I've never been blocked before.  Not even once.  No priors.  Excluding one act of WP:KETTLE, I haven't even been reported to AN3.
# The blocking admin gave no warning regarding disruptive editing, just an indef block.
# At ANI the reason he gave for the block was "BLP"[https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents&diff=prev&oldid=504937814].  This contradicts to reason given here ("disruptive editing"[https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Bittergrey&diff=prev&oldid=504937446]).   
#BLP@ANI was irrelevant:  The "damaging" text was on ANI only because the LP [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents&diff=prev&oldid=504683273 put it there himself], along with additional copies from his supporters[https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents&diff=504756581&oldid=504755309].  This suggests they were just [[Wikipedia:Crying_"BLP!"|crying "BLP"]]. 
#The blocking admin hasn't responded to recent messages, and is no longer an admin[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/SarekOfVulcan_3].  His most recent RFA was declined([http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Doncram/Proposed_decision#SarekOfVulcan_desysopped "...too disruptive."]).

Of course, all of that is old history now.  It has been three years since I've been able to make meaningful edits to wikipedia.  I've been blocked for two. [[User:Bittergrey|BitterGrey]] ([[User talk:Bittergrey#top|talk]]) 14:40, 26 May 2014 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I believe the indef block, now two years old, was and is unnecessary. 

# I've never been blocked before.  Not even once.  No priors.  Excluding one act of WP:KETTLE, I haven't even been reported to AN3.
# The blocking admin gave no warning regarding disruptive editing, just an indef block.
# At ANI the reason he gave for the block was "BLP"[https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents&diff=prev&oldid=504937814].  This contradicts to reason given here ("disruptive editing"[https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Bittergrey&diff=prev&oldid=504937446]).   
#BLP@ANI was irrelevant:  The "damaging" text was on ANI only because the LP [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents&diff=prev&oldid=504683273 put it there himself], along with additional copies from his supporters[https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents&diff=504756581&oldid=504755309].  This suggests they were just [[Wikipedia:Crying_"BLP!"|crying "BLP"]]. 
#The blocking admin hasn't responded to recent messages, and is no longer an admin[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/SarekOfVulcan_3].  His most recent RFA was declined([http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Doncram/Proposed_decision#SarekOfVulcan_desysopped "...too disruptive."]).

Of course, all of that is old history now.  It has been three years since I've been able to make meaningful edits to wikipedia.  I've been blocked for two. [[User:Bittergrey|BitterGrey]] ([[User talk:Bittergrey#top|talk]]) 14:40, 26 May 2014 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}