User talk:Paleolibrairan

Welcome!

Hello, Paleolibrairan, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to David I Orenstein. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Tomato 33 (talk) 15:58, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I would appreciate it if you could add more body to the David I Orenstein article, or else it will be deleted soon! The most important thing to do is get an external reference that indicates his importance. Have a nice day! Tomato 33 (talk) 16:00, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of David I Orenstein

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on David I Orenstein requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Zeus^u|c 16:47, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

May 2014

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. Zeus^u|c 17:02, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of David I Orenstein for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article David I Orenstein is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David I Orenstein until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 17:32, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

In progress autobiography

Paleo,

There are several issues to address with you article on David I Orenstein:

As Orenstein's blog is titled Paleolibrarian, which happens to be your Wikipedia user name, I must presume that the article is an autobiography. Users are strongly discouraged from writing their autobiographies, as the requirement to remain neutral is so hard when writing about oneself.
You have written that the article is "in progress and will be updated throughout the summer". If you insist on continuing with your autobiography (it is not forbidden, but it is strongly discouraged), and it is not yet ready for publication, you should create it in your own user space (at User:Paleolibrarian/David I Orenstein, for example) and only publish it to article space when it is ready.
It is, as of today's version, and unsourced biography of a living person, which makes it eligible for deletion on those grounds alone.
The article, again as of today's version, does not actually assert any particular notability. Orenstein has written some articles, and has a book pending publication, and writes a blog. Unless any of these activities have caused significant third party coverage (independent of the author or his publishers) to be generated, there is no real basis for an article.

I have nominated the article for deletion for now. If you insist on continuing, I would recommend that you copy the current contents to your user space (as I noted above) for further development. And because it is an autobiography, you should probably ask for a review of the article from an independent editor before it is moved to article space. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 17:41, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Paleolibrairan, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Tomato 33 (talk) 17:20, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]