Main page

Talk page

Submissions
Category, Sorting, Feed

Showcase

Participants
Apply, By subject

Reviewing instructions

Help desk

Backlog
drives

Shortcuts

Welcome to the Articles for Creation help desk

This page is only for questions about article submissions—are you in the right place?
- For questions on how to use or edit Wikipedia, visit the Teahouse.
- For unrelated questions, use the search box or the reference desk.
- Create a draft via Article wizard or request an article at requested articles.
Do not provide your email address or other contact details. Answers will be provided on this page.
Watch out for scammers! If someone contacts you saying that they can get your draft published for payment, they are trying to scam you. Report such attempts here.

Ask a new question
Please check back often for answers.

Skip to today's questions · Skip to the bottom · Archived discussions

Top of page
Table of Contents
Today's posts
Bottom of page

May 24

Review of User:Almaguernaranjo/sandbox

Hi! How can I add to an already existing subject the translation to other language?

Wikipedia rejected mi submission because the subject already exist, but it exist in English language but not in Spanish. My submission is in Spanish.

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Elizabeth Philpot

Thanks in advance.Almaguernaranjo (talk) 01:46, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You're aware this is the English Wikipedia, right? You may want to try the Spanish Wikipedia if you intend to write in Spanish. Huon (talk) 01:57, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Review of Draft:Paul Tucker

Hello: I am interested in learning more about why my submission was rejected. Thank youEidsey (talk) 06:11, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I had a look at your submission about Paul Tucker, described as "Internationally recognized as the world’s foremost authority on Claude Monet", which in turn was cited to the Boston Globe and I have no idea either. The decline reason of "This article is not suitable for Wikipedia" is completely false. It needs work to check all the references to confirm that Tucker meets our notability guidelines for people, so I have resubmitted it for you. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 16:45, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Review of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Your submission name here

So I made a topic: Articles for creation: Cosmobilities Network on a global research network of social scienists. I made references to our homepage, our collaborating research groups, the topics (on wiki) covered by the network, and 4 publications from major global/European publishers that have been made within the network.

The post was declined because of lack of notability, so I just wanted to ask: What more can I add to make it acceptable.

Aslakkj (talk) 10:22, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Have you read WP:COI? How about WP:ORG? --Demiurge1000 (talk) 22:23, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Demiurge, have you read WP:OMGWTFBBQ? Aslakkj, you will need to find coverage in books, magazines or newspapers that talk substantially about the company and why it is important. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 05:45, 25 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I've read that. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 09:03, 25 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Review of Draft:Biodeterioration

I recently proposed an entry entitled "Biodeterioration" This was started with the internationally accepted definition and contrasted with the definition for "biodegradation". Although Wikipedia has several articles on specific instances of biodeterioration there is no defining article. The response refused my proposal and included the comment that biodeterioration is just a synonym for biodegradation. My initial proposal was supported by two major authority references. How should I best procced? Dr D. Allsopp.D.Allsopp (talk) 13:43, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Mention this specific usage in the existing article about the topic, using the two references. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 22:21, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Review of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Diamond Of Dreams

Hi,

I have been trying to add an article about an LP by Mike Heron, who is certainly notable as being a member of the Incredible String Band, a very successful sixties band who appeared at Woodstock, and had loads of albums out.

So I don't understand why it was rejected. I referenced the Incredible String Band in the article.

EGriffiths Egriffiths (talk) 15:44, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

For there to be a separate article about the LP, the LP itself needs to be notable by the standards you have been given links to, not just the musician involved. (It's also not clear whether the musician involved is notable in and of himself either?) --Demiurge1000 (talk) 22:17, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Review of Draft:Brian Kennedy (Businessman)

Hi, Im new to Wikipedia.

I created a user called Brian George Kennedy and then proceeded to create a page about him.. I think I have don't this wrong and I should have created an article about this person and his charity work etc... which I have now done......

but I think I have 2 copies now and the Brian George Kennedy needs removing and the article being made live under the user.

The end result is when someone wishes to research information on Brian Kennedy (Businessman) they will find the Wikipedia article and be able to research the encyclopedia on information about him, his career and charity work.

please advise

Regards

Darran.

Brian Kennedy 16:07, 24 May 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brian George Kennedy (talk • contribs)

@Brian George Kennedy:

Declined At your request, I've nominated your promotional user page for speedy deletion. I've also declined your draft as it fails WP:RS, WP:ANYBIO, and WP:GNG. Finally, autobiographies are not allowed on Wikipedia. I recommend you try using the reward board so a 3rd party editor can fix your draft for acceptance. Chris Troutman (talk) 16:34, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The OP's message (above) says that he is not Brian Kennedy, so some of that advice may not be correct. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 22:15, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note for Darran - if you are not Brian Kennedy, then your username is inappropriate, and you should seek to have it changed at WP:CHU/S. "Brian Kennedy (businessman)" is not appropriate either. The only person with a username "Brian Kennedy" should be Brian Kennedy himself. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 09:02, 25 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

May 25

Review of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Kalahasti P Prasad

Hi WikiEditor,

Please let know if I can still submit article Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Kalahasti P Prasad for review for the purpose of new article creation. Thanks, Calahas Calahas (talk) 00:11, 25 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Calahas. Yes, you can still submit the article for review. Just click "Submit your draft when you are ready for it to be reviewed!" and save the page. (The notice of a review waiting will be at the end.) However, at this time, I do not believe it will be accepted. Wikipedia articles need references to independent, reliable sources of information to demonstrate notability, either through the general guideline or the guideline for academics. Lists of publications are not enough for this. Anon126 (notify me of responses! / talk / contribs) 03:01, 25 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Review of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Your submission name here

I created an article in my sandbox and submitted it for review. I since found a page of that name already existed, but it was a "redirect". I therefore deleted the redirection command on the page and added the text developed in the sandbox. It's now upand running, so there is no longer any need for review. How do I cancel the review submission? AliceCybernetics (talk) 09:21, 25 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have cleared your sandbox - it's now ready for your next article. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 09:36, 25 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

May 26

wiki page update

We as a group enjoy having a big title on your site and wish for you to update the page for anonymous because acording to your site we are a little under rated — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.99.64.43 (talk) 02:04, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You mean Anonymous (group)? It looks pretty lengthy to me! If you wish to contribute to an article, this isn't the place to do it. Either click on the 'Edit' tab at the top of the article in question, or suggest an edit on the Talk page. Sionk (talk) 14:40, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Review of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/R King Crawford

Dear Helper,

I am grateful to your helper JustBerry for pointing me in your direction. It would be greatly appreciated if I could be advised regarding the easiest way to achieve a listing for my friend and artist Robert King Crawford. He is computer illiterate, so I have been acting on his behalf to have him listed by Wikipedia (since November 2012). I am 83 and he is 87 in August. I'm hoping that with your kind advice we may achieve listing approval before we become old!!!

Some of the References listed in the draft contain reviews and feature articles which one would expect prove Crawford's 'notability' beyond doubt. If the texts from these references were quoted and/or uploaded would this help?

Are there currently 'offending' claims that can be temporarily omitted from the draft (to be proven and reinstated later) in order to gain approval?

I thank you in anticipation of your kind advice.

Marcus Of Oz (talk) 02:58, 26 May 2014 (UTC) Marcus Of Oz[reply]

You need to understand that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a promotional listing service. 95% of your draft article is based at length on what Robert Crawford says about himself and his work. Instead you need to write the article concisely based on what other independent journalistic (or book) sources have said about him and his work. I can see you've listed some news/magazine coverage at the bottom of your article, I suggest you base your Wikipedia article on what these news sources say. As a start off I'd strongly suggest you permanently remove the long 'Mesmeric Art' poem(?) and the Ten Commandments.

There are tailored 'notability' guidelines for creative professionals at WP:ARTIST which you may find useful to look at.

It will also help your cause if you can cite the various facts/claims in your article to specific sources, using some form of inline citation. These aren't essential but are extremely helpful, particularly when the sources are not available online - it gives the reader/reviewer a better idea of what the news/magazine articles say. Good luck! (talk) 14:34, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sionk Thank you very much Sionk for your thoughtful advice addressing my immediate queries. I will do my best to follow your guidelines. Marcus Of Oz (talk) 09:15, 28 May 2014 (UTC) Marcus Of Oz[reply]

Review of Draft:Schmiedmann

Hi.

Regarding the rejection. I have used the article Hartge as a template for this. Could you please pin point how my draft differs? (This is my first article, so any help is much appreciated :-) )

Regarding notability i have found these resources:

http://media.schmiedmann.com/media/76801/article_jydske_vestkysten_nordborg_21_04_2014_english.pdf (This has been published in a newsletter that requires subscription) http://static.schmiedmann.dk/Html/danish/presse/total-bmw/total-bmw-july-2012-schmiedmann-article.pdf#page=1

Image upload I would like to include schmiedmann logo to the infobox, however it seems I do not have permission to upload (or simply not skilled enough ;-)). Would someone please do this for me: http://static.schmiedmann.dk/images/company-logo.png (This must fall under fair use)

Plug1ndk (talk) 08:46, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Hartge article is a very poor article indeed and may be deleted at any time. Please don't use it as a template. In particular, articles about companies need to prove they have been widely written about in independent reliable (journalistic) sources. The sources you have highlighted above are clearly not independent. Sionk (talk) 14:45, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Review of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Alessandra_Sanguinetti

Hello. I was hoping to get guidance on how to get this article accepted. This is the article- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Alessandra_Sanguinetti She is extremely notable in photography- the Guggenheim, being in Magnum, and being published by Nazareli are at the top of the most notable things that can happen. Any advice on getting this published is appreciated. Thanks!TammyMercure (talk) 15:25, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It's very close to being okay, in my view. The ArtDaily article is a good one, if you know of any more news articles or reviews of her work, please add them. If you can find reliable proof that she has examples of her work in important public collections (like the ones you've listed) this may be sufficient to squeak past WP:CREATIVE notability criteria threshold. Sionk (talk) 19:20, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Review of Draft:Barry Farah

The submission for article Barry Farah was rejected with comments about fictional characters not being suitable. He is not fictional as the references to real world events confirm. How can this be resolved? Review of Draft:Barry Farah

Lyricus9Lyricus9 (talk) 15:47, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please resubmit. FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 12:54, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Review of Draft:Barry Farah

I am having some difficulty with references that I have included in the body of the article. In the first and fourth sections the references are embedding correctly. In the second and third sections the references are not linking in the same way. What am I doing incorrectly?

Also, I am attempting to add a photo file. Following the directions, I can create the frame but am not sure where I can pull the file from. I see no option to download it from my computer. Does it need to be put on an FTP site for download?

Lyricus9Lyricus9 (talk) 16:02, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Lyricus9: Please read WP:CITE. You're using external links within the body of the article, not references. Furthermore, those links don't appear to be reliable. Squarespace is not a source. Also, I invited you to try the Wikipedia Adventure, which will help with your coding. See the file upload wizard to upload an image. Once uploaded you can link to it. Chris Troutman (talk) 16:52, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Review of Wikipedia talk:Sunil Agrawal

Why did my article dint got approved? what modifications i have to do? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Prakharagrawal.1994 (talk • contribs) 18:21, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It needs extensive coverage in independent and reliable sources. FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 12:57, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Review of Manitoba Chinese Community Centre/Pangh

Hi I submit an article about Manitoba Chinese Community Centre(MCCC) and it was declined. I would like to know the reason. Thank you very much!

Panghd (talk) 22:17, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Panghd. User:Panghd/sandbox was declined because the draft was blank; you had not included any information about the subject, nor any references to reliable sources to support the information. Arthur goes shopping (talk) 10:39, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

May 27

Review of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/FileSick

helllo

my article has been declined moment ago and i received a notification message just now but i don't know the reason why so if you can please let me know what happened and how to fix it please

waiting for your respond — Preceding unsigned comment added by FileSick (talk • contribs) 00:25, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:FileSick was declined for the reasons given in the pink box at the top of that page. Click on the links in the decline reason for more information. Arthur goes shopping (talk) 10:42, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Review of Draft:John Morris Anglin

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/John Morris Anglin

What is the best way to insert a .jpg photo into my article. I clearly see the "Insert" and photo symbol, and using that does insert the position of the photo . . . but how do I upload the photo so it will appear in the article . . . or how do I instruct the program where to find that specific photo to upload?

Michael Anglin — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mwanglin (talk • contribs) 02:39, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Mwanglin: Wikipedia:Images lists how to updload images. Please make sure the images you upload are appropriate to the Image Policy. Hasteur (talk) 13:15, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Review of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Your submission name hereNeil Harrap

Someone had placed material about me on Wikipedia that was very incomplete so I've endeavored to update it. I have provided links to the NY Times, CNN, NBC, Jeremy Clarkson at BBC, TripAdvisor, etc. Are they not sufficient? Neil 203.79.104.117 (talk) 04:56, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Neil, thank you for adding these sources. I have removed the "blp prod" deletion template from the article, because the article cannot be deleted under that process when reliable sources exist. There are still numerous issues with the article, as described by the other templates that are still there. Hopefully these issues can be fixed in due course. It is recommended that you avoid editing the article directly, instead you could provide further sources, information and corrections on the talk page at Talk:Neil Harrap. Arthur goes shopping (talk) 10:09, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Review of Draft:Mineral & Gem International Show

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Hugopottier Heyo, I just would like to know how long it takes to have a review ? I don't know if my article is at the right place... I made my article about "Mineral & Gem International Show" Hugopottier (talk) 07:35, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Hugo. Your draft article is at the right place. The review process is currently severely backlogged, so it could take a very long time to be reviewed; possibly more than a month. Arthur goes shopping (talk) 09:56, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your answer. :)

Hugopottier (talk) 07:43, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Hugopottier:

Declined. I've already spammed your talk page, but please read WP:RS, WP:GNG, and WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. Chris Troutman (talk) 08:02, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Virtual personal trainer (May 26)

Hi, I am seeking help having my phrase approved. Your submission at Articles for creation: Virtual personal trainer (May 26) What is my next step? Thank you. Duncanmt (talk) 13:25, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Duncan. Draft:Virtual personal trainer was rejected because the reviewer believed the information would be better contained in the existing article Personal trainer, as noted on the draft page itself. I also noticed that at least one of the sources you provide is not about the topic that the draft purports to address. I'm not wholly sure of the next step, but how would you feel about adding information to that existing article instead? Arthur goes shopping (talk) 15:24, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Review of User:Dpanic/sandbox

Dear,

I am writing english article on page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Dpanic/sandbox

There is also article in Serbian language here: https://sr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orhan_Draga%C5%A1

I need help with uploading pictures, as I understand they're already on Wikipedia Serbian edition.

Also There is some issue with referencing, should I remove references to non existing pages?

Regards,

dolphin (talk) 17:05, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Dpanic/sandbox

@Dpanic: The image on the Serbian language Wikipedia can be uploaded at the file upload wizard. Your submission (as well as the SR Wiki article) lack references and fail WP:GNG and WP:ANYBIO. Chris Troutman (talk) 18:32, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Review of Draft:Dojie's Law

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Dojie's Lsw

Trying to get this up on your site, but I keep getting a message saying that it's not submitted for review, no matteer how many times I submit it for review. Help??

I have a lot of information to add regarding the history, additional title listings, etc.

How can I submit this for review when submitting it for review does not actually submit it for review????

Now I am getting warning messages on how I am submitting this to the page, and a referral to the help dask. I thought this WAS the help desk!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.105.177.172 (talk) 18:40, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@76.105.177.172: First, your entry is submitted for review. Be aware that WP:NOBODYCARES. I understand a dog in Oregon got beat by an animal control officer and some Oregonians want to pass a law to criminalize that behavior but Wikipedia is not here to advertise that proposal. Furthermore, I'm not convinced despite the news coverage of the dog beating that the proposed law itself is notable. Chris Troutman (talk) 22:35, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

May 28

Review of Draft:Katie Howard

Hi,

I am working on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Katie_Howard, and I am not sure how to create a page that is unique of the other Katie Howard pages, as she is notable in her own right as a mixed martial artist. Any help would be great. Thanks. Corporatemonster (talk) 02:54, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Corporatemonster: Your submission has been submitted for review so you don't need to create another page. Your submission appears to fail WP:MMANOT although a case could be made for passing WP:GNG based on mentions in the Clackamas Print. Chris Troutman (talk) 04:53, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

What about the Portland State Vanguard newspaper articles? It is a university newspaper with an editorial board, and has recently received awards for journalistic excellence.

With this in mind, would she not have 2 credible sources that are not just routine coverage? With that in mind, I am unable to find whether a university newspaper (from a ranked university as per Forbes? Is there also a way that I could weigh in once considerations are being made? I noticed on WP:N that it is not necessarily a popularity contest,and that someone can be considered exremely interesting based on coverage in the media, and thus be worthy of inclusion on Wikipedia. I would argue that Katie Howard meets these parameters, I would just hate for someone to look and see that she has not fought in the UFC or Bellator yet and dimiss her without taking everything into consideration. Corporatemonster (talk) 17:06, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict) As I said, there's a case to be made. Wikipedia doesn't have a list of reliable sources. I don't know if a university newspaper (regardless of which university) is ever considered reliable. Determinations of this sort are made at WP:RS/N. I didn't accept or decline your submission because it could go either way. WikiProject MMA tends to favor fighters that have been in top tier promotions and I defer to them. I tagged the draft's talk page with the WPMMA banner to encourage their attention. You might contact them at the WikiProject's talk page. Since Katie Howard may potentially fight in the UFC someday, this draft can be steadily improved until she reaches that top tier. I wouldn't oppose another reviewer from accepting this draft on the basis of general notability. As for being "extremely interesting", I don't recall Katie being mentioned on Inside MMA or Womensmmaroundup, so I'm not so sure that applies. Wikipedia is based on sourcing, anyway. Chris Troutman (talk) 17:34, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Review of Symphony Analytics

Hello. I recently submitted a piece on Symphony Analytics. The piece was speedily deleted. What changes or additions do I need to make to get the article accepted? Grateful for any advice. I will gladly resubmit the text for comment.

PaulinSweden (talk) 04:14, 28 May 2014 (UTC)PaulinSweden[reply]

I can't see the article that was deleted. However, you may wish to resubmit it under Articles for Creation by using the Wikipedia:Article wizard. This may mean that it is less likely to be speedily deleted as overtly promotional. Remember to focus purely on concrete facts about the organisation. Be aware that the organisation is only likely to be suitable for a Wikipedia article if it meets the requirements of Wikipedia:CORP; and also that you should not copy and paste material from the company's own website. Arthur goes shopping (talk) 09:37, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@PaulinSweden: As Dewritech noted on your talk page, your submission was overtly promotional. Read WP:REFUND to ask about getting your content restored into your user sandbox. Chris Troutman (talk) 16:25, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Chris. This is very useful. I'll give it a try. — Preceding unsigned comment added by PaulinSweden (talk • contribs) 17:01, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Review of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Importance of Digital Marketing

Dear Help Desk,

We submitted article may 5th on 22nd May we got the following msg..

Hello! Emerchantacademy, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 21:57, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

please let us know the reason for declined ,,,,

Regards e-merchant academy

Emerchantacademy (talk) 10:51, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your article was declined because it did not cite any reliable sources, which are required to know that what you write is acceptable and important, and because we already have an article on digital marketing. Who is "us"? You should only use one account per person. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 12:55, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

How do I re submit an article?

I can't find the re submit button. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hannahro95 (talk • contribs) 13:09, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

That is because you removed the template on the page, including the refusal notice and explanation, when you began editing the copy again. I'll put the original notice back on the page so you can use the resubmit button. FYI, it's best to leave the article's history intact, including any notes from editors, as it greatly assists other editors in reviewing. Hope that helps. Libby norman (talk) 13:17, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Review of [[Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Add Jessica Utts' review to balance Hyman

Russell Targ's bio page. There is a very negative quote from Ray Hyman's part of the AIR report criticizing my research. The other half of the AIR report was very favorable to my work, and it doesn't appear. I think that a an encyclopedia should be fair and balanced should include both parts. Jessica Utts is a statistics Professor at the University of California, Irvine, and is president of the American Statistical Association. In writing for her part of a 1995 evaluation of our work for the CIA, she wrote: “Using the standards applied to any other area of science, it is concluded that psychic functioning has been well established. The statistical results of the studies examined are far beyond what is expected by chance. Arguments that these results could be due to methodological flaws in the experiments are soundly refuted.… Remote viewing has been conceptually replicated across a number of laboratories, by various experimenters, and in different cultures. This is a robust effect that, were it not such an unusual domain, would no longer be questioned by science as a real phenomenon. It is unlikely that methodological flaws could account for its remarkable consistency.” Torgownik (talk) 16:26, 28 May 2014 (UTC)Russell[reply]

Yo Russell. That's not an article for creation or a draft article, and is thus outside the scope of this project and this page. I suggest trying Talk:Russell Targ instead. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 18:04, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Review of smile foundation india

Greetings!!!

Can you please tell me the reason why our article submitted is declined??

Regrads — Preceding unsigned comment added by Flaircommunications (talk • contribs) 16:48, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Flaircommunications: I find it odd that you ask about "our" article. You have claimed to be an individual and that doesn't seem true. Please read the notices about why your submission was twice declined. Chris Troutman (talk) 21:21, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Review of Draft:Sergei Varshavsky

I was informed that my article about a writer and art collector Sergei Varshavsky was declined. I assume that the reason was that the person I am writing about has the same name as myself. Hence, the article is not about myself but about my grandfather, who's books were published in many languages in Russia and abroad, and who's collections currently reside in world famous museums such as The Hermitage. Please reconsider rejection. Thank you, Sergei Varshavsky Svarshavsky (talk) 17:04, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Svarshavsky: This entry was obviously copied from the Russian language Wikipedia article. The problem is that you copied the plain text of the article rather than the code causing you to miss the original references and include meaningless footnote markers. The original Russian article relies too heavily on Varshavsky's work and lacks independent third-party reliable sources, anyway. Finally, your submission fails to meet WP:AUTHOR, WP:GNG, or WP:ANYBIO. More research will need to be done before this is ready. Chris Troutman (talk) 03:13, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Review of Draft:The Lugar Center

The submission for The Lugar Center has already been reviewed once and transferred from user space to draft space. Is there any way to ensure it gets a second review and moved into main space? It has been over a month since the article was submitted for review.Krh4000 (talk) 19:20, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Krh4000:

Declined Your submission has only one independent source. Based on your edits, you appear to be an eager staffer or a paid editor. Try the reward board to find an independent editor to fix this for you. Chris Troutman (talk) 21:12, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

May 29

Review of Draft:EUROPEAN International School Ho Chi Minh City (EIS)

Please let me know why my article has not been accepted.

Richard Muden (talk) 01:32, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Richard Muden: Your submission needs to conform to WP:WPSCHOOLS/AG. Also, you have no independent reliable sources. Please also read WP:NSCHOOL. Chris Troutman (talk) 02:51, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Review of User:Pranavtat09/sandbox

how to change my user name pranavtat09 to Pranav Kumar Singh.can u provide Detail procedure of that.

@Pranavtat09:

Declined See WP:CHU to change your username. See WP:AUTO, WP:NOT, WP:COI, and WP:RS about your sandbox article. Chris Troutman (talk) 04:52, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Review of Draft:Qlick

Why it has not accepted the article I submitted? Can you specify the areas that need improvement?Smilecathy (talk) 05:59, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Smilecathy: As indicated, the submission is written like an ad and it lacks both reliable sources and any claim to notability. Chris Troutman (talk) 06:05, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Review of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Your submission name here

Hello, I am writing with respect to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Laura Baird Last week we submitted an article on Laura Baird. It was deleted due to "copyright infriengement", but the site which it allegedly copied, was in fact Ms. Baird's bio, which we provided for a conference she took part in. The Bio is original and was heavily revised for Wikipedia, but of course some of her projects and experience were "found". Ms. Baird is an Associate at our office and (by now) very accomplished, how can we submit this article so it will not be immediately rejected again? OMA AMO (talk) 11:10, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you own the copyright to the biography and wish to freely license it, instructions for doing so can be found at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. This would avoid the problem of it being deleted for copyright infringement. However, there would still be no guarantee that the material would be suitable as the basis of a Wikipedia article. It is important to remember that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a business directory or promotional site. Arthur goes shopping (talk) 13:59, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Review of Draft:Sinenjongo times

does it matter the type of article it is? — Preceding unsigned comment added by nkqusquared47 (talk • contribs)

@Nkqusquared47:

Declined Yes, it does. Chris Troutman (talk) 15:15, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

How to Re-submit an Article that has been edited?

How do I re-submit an article from the sandbox, that has been edited?— Preceding unsigned comment added by JaneyF (talk • contribs)

Hi JaneyF. If you are trying to resubmit User:JaneyF/sandbox, just put {{subst:submit}} at the top of it and then save the page. Arthur goes shopping (talk) 14:37, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Review of Draft:Federal Health Architecture

I have tried updating the Draft:Federal Health Architecture/Nicole Keglerseveral times and it keeps getting rejected. The content on this page is to inform and be resource to people about this federal initiative. I have provided links to outside resources but, there isn't much public information available on the initiative. Please help me understand what needs to be included in this article in order to get it approved. Thank you.

Nicole Kegler Nkegler (talk) 19:11, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Nkegler: Your submission must meet WP:GNG or WP:NCORP or both. If there isn't independent coverage then it's not notable and therefore not worthy of inclusion. Chris Troutman (talk) 19:38, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Review of User:Patkelso/sandbox

I would like to post stuff from this site, http://www.webexhibits.org/about/legal.html, but cannot find copywrite bug requested by Upload Wizard. but site does say this: "Links & copies We invite you to link to any page. You can also copy or display this exhibit for noncommercial purposes, if you clearly credit Christopher Tyler, Michael Kubovy and WebExhibits. Legal details." Pat Kelso (talk) 21:56, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Pat. Wikipedia requires that copied content should be suitable for use for all purposes, not just noncommercial purposes, and therefore material from that site cannot be copied onto Wikipedia. Arthur goes shopping (talk) 08:09, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

May 30

Review of User:Imansoor/sandbox

can you let me know why the page is deleted actually?

One of competitors were able to publish it https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LocalOye.com I did the same format with our brand and information. What is the actual reason removing it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Imansoor (talk • contribs)

@Imansoor: Yes, LocalOye.com is crap. I've tagged it and it may be deleted. Meanwhile, your entry was deleted by Deb only 20 hours ago for being obvious advertisement. Now you're trying again? Neither entry has reliable sources or a real claim to notability. Chris Troutman (talk) 07:05, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've deleted LocalOye.com for advertising - why mess around? It appears neither user understands the wikipedia guidelines. Deb (talk) 14:52, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Review of Draft:Jesse Faber

Hi,

I would like to know more about why my submission has been rejected in order to improve it. There are several referencing to external articles that make the information verifiable.

Thanks in advance. JesseFaber (talk) 11:04, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Jesse. I went through your draft and formatted the referencing properly in order to be able to see what kinds of sources you were using. Simply adding inline external links in the article is not the correct way to reference. I completely removed all the YouTube links. (1) They are not considered valid references in this context, and (2) they are all copyright infringements. I also removed inline external links to other Wikipedia articles and the inline link to your own web site. So what's left? Very little that would indicate that the subject passes the criteria for inclusion as an article here. You were given links to read in the decline notice at the top of your draft. I strongly suggest you click on each of those links and read them carefully—all the way through. They will explain why most of your current references are useless for establishing that the subject meets the notability criteria and why some of them are even inappropriate for simply verifying the information in the article. You should also look at the alternative criteria for Creative professionals. Finally, I am assuming from your name that you are also the subject. Wikipedia strongly discourages writing articles about yourself or on subjects to which you have close connection, either personally or financially. Suggested reading Wikipedia:Autobiography and Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. – Voceditenore (talk) 13:58, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Review of Draft:European Academy of Bozen

i understand why the article in march was rejected. Independent sources were missing. I added them and resented the question for review. After this, nothing happened, but the article was moved from Articles for creation to Draft. Without a comment. Can someone tell me what’s wrong about the article? Niuwörldorder (talk) 12:34, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Moving the submission from Articles for Creation to Draft (which was done by Rankersbo) means nothing; at the moment, we're trying to put some submissions in the Draft namespace since it (the namespace) was recently introduced.

The submission looks like it has a bunch of sources and will probably be reviewed, according to the banner at the top, sometime in the next month. Thanks! APerson (talk!) 20:40, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Review of User:LynxHungaricus/Ga-nime

I think I made some mistake but I'm not sure. When I made my draft, I pressed the "Submit your draft for review!" button. Then a new page appeared with only the content in the edit box saying I should not edit anything explicitly saying in that whole edit box just press the save button below. I did that, there was no warning that I may lose my article in the making... and now I can't find anything what I wrote. The yellow Review waiting window says "In the meantime, you can continue to improve this article by pressing the "Edit" tab at the top of the window" suggesting that what I see is not normal at all. If I did click the edit link, I'd just get the same edit box with the content do not change anything there. So... does my draft disappeared? I went to other drafts waiting to be accepted and most of them had the content in it, not just the yellow box. Do I have to recreate everything or is there a way to get back what I submitted for review?

LynxHungaricus (talk) 14:05, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@LynxHungaricus: I moved your submission to Draft:Ga-nime. Your submission has no reliable sources, which cannot be allowed. You will also need to prove notability. Chris Troutman (talk) 16:38, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Chris troutman: Edit: everything's proven reliably in the draft. Sorry for previous mistakes, I overlooked the fact that the main source has English site!

Review of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/KidCareCanada Society

Please advise why this submission was refused, and how I can change it.

Thanks. KatharineHolmes (talk) 16:22, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@KatharineHolmes: Read the comments Timtrent left for you on the article. Please also read WP:TONE, WP:RS, WP:NOTADVERTISING, and WP:GNG. Chris Troutman (talk) 16:53, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Review of Draft:Perspective projection

My edited "Perspective Projection Distortion," https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Patkelso/sandbox was declined because it was deemed better to merge it into "Perspective projection," https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perspective_Projection#Perspective_projection. I would prefer to keep the former in my sandbox for reference but I would also like to edit and merge it into the latter via a sandbox. Can this be done? (I would appreciate a heads-up email, Kelso@coes.latech.edu, with link, of where I might find your reply.) Thank you.Pat Kelso (talk) 19:52, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, go ahead. You would do so by editing Perspective projection.

You can reach me as demiurge1000.wikipedia@gmail.com and I hope that satisfies your requirements for replies. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 22:30, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Review of Draft:Evidence and Case Studies for Agile Software Development Methodologies

How do I communicate with the editor who rejected my article? Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Evidence and Case Studies for Agile Software Development Methodologies Sarah M SarahMonsees (talk) 20:21, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@SarahMonsees: While MatthewVanitas declined your submission, I can address your questions. Your first sentence: "When pursuing software or product development quality using Agile methodologies, there is Evidence and Case Studies for Agile Software Development Methodologies that Agile methods improve quality of the resulting products." is clear evidence you've written an essay. Please also read WP:NPOV. Chris Troutman (talk) 20:40, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Review of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Roberta Joy Weir

I had my article Wikipediatalk:Articles for creation Roberta Joy Weir reviewed and turned down. I'd like to know what was wrong with the article; I believe the subject to have sufficient notability and verifiable references for publication. Thanks all for help & encouragement.P.g.duffy (talk) 21:08, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You do have some reliable sources in the submission; however, Timtrent (aka Fiddle Faddle), who reviewed the article, thought (and I agree with him/her) that many of the statements in the article need citations, according to Wikipedia's verifiability policy. You should look carefully at Fiddle Faddle's comment, and try to address the remarks made in it. APerson (talk!) 20:18, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@P.g.duffy: I do try very hard to give as clear a rationale as I am able. It was wise of you to come here to get further opinions. We're always pleased when editors come and ask for help, the more so when a review has been disappointing. If, after reading and acting on the elements of my comments you feel are appropriate, you have further questions please drop by my talk page or {{ping}} me here and ask. Be as specific as you can, please.

One thing I try not to do is a further formal review of the same article. Our system is more useful when further pairs of eyes look at a submission. Our objective is to help you to avoid deletion when your article goes live. That truly hurts. We don't always succeed, but we do a pretty good job. I include you in the "we". You are as much part of the team as a reviewer. Fiddle Faddle 22:00, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Review of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Mark Sheldon Ross

Hello, I have invited to contact by the OTRS team, now that permissions are in order for the new article below. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Mark_Sheldon_Ross What is next required before it can be published? Thank you EdouardGris (talk) 21:40, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I just submitted the draft; now, all you have to do is wait until one of the Articles for Creation reviewers takes a look at it; after they review it, they will leave a note on your talk page. So, you should check your submission periodically. Thanks! APerson (talk!) 20:24, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Review of Draft:Narawa Games

I created the website in the article, but the site is not a popular one, so nobody knows it exists. That means there are no Internet sources available. How to I reference and cite it? The article is at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Narawa Games. 2601:E:2C00:44A:16C:AC93:1C2C:5937 (talk) 22:14, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Are there any printed books from well known publishers that mention it? Or printed magazines from reputable sources?

If there aren't any of these either, then it is too soon to make a Wikipedia article about this website.

Wait until the website is widely known. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 22:27, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I can't change a band's main picture?

For the Family Force 5 page, the main band picture has not been updated since 2008 I believe. This band also got a new lead singer and drummer in September. It's been 9 months now and no one has uploaded a new picture with the new members. I do not see any way for me to change the picture. Is this because it's protected? Does that mean the old picture will stay on their page until the person who has it protected changes it? Also, is the person who actually submitted the page for the band the only person allowed to change the main band/profile picture? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hannahro95 (talk • contribs) 03:45, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This page is for questions about the Articles for creation process. Please consider asking this question at the Wikipedia:Help desk. - This is where editors will try to answer any question regarding how to use Wikipedia. Just follow the link, select the relevant section, and ask away. You could always try searching Wikipedia for any help related to the topic you want to know more about. I hope this helps! APerson (talk!) 20:15, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Review of [1]

Review of [2]

Hi!

I don't understand if the article i'm working on, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Martin_Haene is still pending for review by an editor or if I have to react in any way. Could you tell me that, please?

Thank you very much for your help and greetings,

FrS

FrS (talk) 07:53, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Sandro.friedrich: I think the problem was caused by removal of the notice declining the submission. This meant you lost track of what was going on. I have restored it. I will pop over to the draft and make some comments there. Please do not delete the boxes and comments declining things. They help you and future reviewers, and are removed on acceptance. Fiddle Faddle 13:28, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Sandro.friedrich: What you need to do now, should you choose to, is to look at comments made, consider what you will adopt from them, and, once you have, resubmit the article. This one does need a fair bit of work. Fiddle Faddle 13:39, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Review of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Barry King (tennis)

Resolved

– Article was created. APerson (talk!) 19:54, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, my article was rejected about Barry King/tennis due to issues with the context of the article. Here is the link:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Barry_King_(tennis)

Thanks, any help appreciated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Footer44 (talk • contribs) 11:29, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Review of [Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&diff=next&oldid=610897325]

Hi! I got a message that an change had been made by an editor: "Wikipedia page Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk has been changed by Footer44"

Except all it displays is an article about tennis which doesn't have to do with me. Can you check this? Thank you!

Best,

FrS FrS (talk) 11:50, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The diff which you linked to looks like you starting a post. I'm guessing that the notification system thought that Footer44, who started a thread right below you, was responding to your thread. APerson (talk!) 20:11, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Review of Nate Fakes

Hello,

I was just curious to why the submission to include Nate Fakes was rejected and if there are any edits I can do to help improve it.

Thanks!

Jim AddamsJimboaddams (talk) 15:56, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like FoCuSandLeArN, who reviewed the submission, linked you to WP:ARTIST. It doesn't look like Nate Fakes meets that guideline yet. You may also want to focus on meeting WP:GNG, which doesn't cover artists specifically, by adding more reliable, independent sources about Nate Fakes as sources. You should cite phrases like "He is also known for his work". Although it is not required, since the submission contains multiple sources which focus on only one sentence in the submission (e.g. the "Knocking on Heaven's Door" mention), you should look at Citation Style 1. APerson (talk!) 19:53, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Review of User:Nidhitanusri/sandbox

Why my article is rejectedNidhitanusri (talk) 19:53, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

As the two reviewers who looked at the submission said, your article needs more reliable sources so that the content in it can be verified.

Please re-submit the article only after adding some. Thanks! APerson (talk!) 20:05, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Review of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/KKAnini

biography of auguste francois michaut thanks for creating the article but i do not understand why it appears in google search as https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:KKAnini/sandbox and not https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Auguste-Fran%C3%A7ois_Michaut how to change it? KKAnini (talk) 21:16, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

That's down to Google. Google will probably update itself in a few days. If not, you could ask for the redirect to be deleted. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 00:27, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Review of Draft:Eliot Lewis (musician)Righttrack

I need help understanding what is an acceptable source for Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Righttrack. According to one of your volunteers, an article in which a journalist or blogger interviewed Mr. Lewis is fine, but video of a TV interview in which a journalist asks him questions and he answers is not. The volunteer said that Mr. Lewis' answers have to be "substantially rewritten" before they can be used as a source. To me, as a former journalist, that seems odd. Also, I was told that to be a source, an article *must* be online. That may be a problem, since not all papers have all their entire article base online.

Thank you for your help!

Righttrack (talk) 00:57, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Who told you that sources must be online? Where did they tell you this? Whoever they are, they are 100% wrong.

As for the TV interview, one doesn't cite a piece of video footage that happens to be online somewhere; one cites the publication, i.e. the TV programme that it aired on.

Interviews are not great for proving notability, because they are mainly sources for what the person claims about themselves. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 01:28, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Review of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Rpenafiel

Hi, I was wondering if my article was accepted or declined because it stays on my sandbox User:Rpenafiel and I have not received any other notes from editor. It does show on my "contribution" list but I'm not sure whether my content was accepted and published nor if rejected and needs further editing to be done to get accepted as Wiki content. Thank you very much.Rpenafiel (talk) 04:25, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You were informed on your talk page that the submission had been declined. You reacted by removing the information about the reasons for it being declined, in this edit. Feel free to further improve the submission in accordance with the advice given. You can resubmit it by putting {{subst:submit}} on the submission page. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 04:29, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Review of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sean Erlston

The article has been declined but there is no explanation why. Wikipedia has an article/page about wedding photographers which can only have names listed if an article page exists about that photographer, which is why I made the page submission which has been rejected.How do you make a page, which is a prerequisite, without it being rejected?Sean Erlston (talk) 05:13, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia only needs biographical articles about people that are notable - see WP:GNG. Sadly, you are not yet notable by that standard. Reasons for an article being declined are almost always found on the page submitted. In this case that seems not to be accessible to you or to me - perhaps the submitted page was too overtly promotional (like spam) or perhaps it was a copyright violation by copying from an external website? --Demiurge1000 (talk) 05:54, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Review of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Richard Sexton

Hi there--just wanted to stop by and ask if there might be anything holding up review of this entry. I know the article review process is backlogged.

I originally started working on this article in Feb., have worked with a few volunteer Wiki editors, and want to make sure there's nothing missing before it gets to a reviewer. Thanks!

Theenglishmaven (talk) 15:14, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Theenglishmaven (talk) - I reviewed the article - made a few minor changes and added a ref to verify the biographical information in the article. I know it's been a while - thanks for your patience! Julie JSFarman (talk) 20:29, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Review of Draft:Waterloo Busker Carnival

I believe this article is ready for publication. It is not "fictional"....not sure where that came from...and while the help is appreciated.....and I have done as asked....even to point out that the Waterloo Chronicle is a weekly newspaper as well as being on-line (like the majority of newspapers today). It's time to approve this and get it on Wikipedia. Thank you!DivaWord (talk) 21:02, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Review of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/John Sutton Lutz

Hello. I've completed my draft of [[Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/JohnSuttonLutz] and am not sure how to activate it? Could you please advise. I'm clearly doing something incorrectly. KeithKeith Thor Carlson (talk) 00:02, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Review of Draft:Yun Mu Kwan (karate)

I submitted an article called Yun Mu Kwan the other day from my sandbox https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Swmirsky/sandbox and received a message as follows:

"This sandbox is in the Draft namespace. Either move this page into your userspace, or remove the This sandbox is in the Wikipedia namespace. Either move this page into your userspace, or remove the {{User sandbox}} template. template."

I don't understand what it is telling me to do. Can someone assist? Thanks.

Swmirsky (talk) 03:03, 2 June 2014 (UTC) swmirsky[reply]

Done. You just need to remove the template at the top of the draft. JSFarman (talk) 03:16, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Joe

In relation to the Article, I am the trademark holder and designer of Hottorque. Are you refering to the copright material as in from it being from Business Wire.

The stated comments in the business wire article are in true fact, as our company being the first to create a social media application with a Iphone App integration for the Automotive industry also we were the first Australian Tech Company to be a sponsor in a NASCAR sprintcup event.

So what do you suggest we create our own Article based on all the facts rather than the Business wire article

Also I would like to know how do we get this Article to main stream wiki?

Regards Laz Till CEO Hottorque.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by HtorqueMarketing (talk • contribs) 05:42, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Review of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Your submission name here

under what accounting entry is the battery use for wall clock

Review of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Your submission name here

under what accounting entry is the battery use for wall clock