User talk:Gogo Dodo
Welcome to my talk page! I will reply on your talk page unless you prefer otherwise as usually noted on your talk page. If you are an editor without an account, I will reply here.
|
If you are here to ask me why I deleted your article, please read the common reasons why I have deleted your article. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Not exactly sure why you deleted my Poker Game, "Spade and Hand" I read the common reasons, still not sure which part is wrong. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Delven1966 (talk • contribs) 01:02, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
- Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 03:38, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
its true look it up — Preceding unsigned comment added by Buddhaboy23 (talk • contribs) 04:23, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
- Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 04:28, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
Hello Sir, Plz Dont Delete My Article.
You Just Check That Article.. plz — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gnets (talk • contribs) 06:33, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for cleaning my mess
I tried to help out a user who made their userpage in the mainspace, but gave it a double 'user:' prefix. You very promptly cleaned up my mess. Good job. Piguy101 (talk) 21:50, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
- Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 21:57, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
Hi there. I noticed you removed the addition of this user at Permanent account number and he has reverted you calling it disruptive. He does the same on Aadhaar and Unique Identification Authority of India. I have reverted all the promotional edits that he has added, but he still keeps reverting them. Can you take a look? Thanks, — LeoFrank Talk 04:05, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
- @LeoFrank: I was reverting some spam from a different editor, though on closer inspection, the Permanent account number has far too many external inline links which I will be removing shortly. It appears that Ravishyam Bangalore has ownership issues with the articles that they edit, blindly reverting any edits, and edit warring to get back to their preferred version. Should they return, I recommend reporting them to WP:ANI or WP:ANEW as appropriate. WP:ANI would probably be a better place since the issue seems to be long running and probably needs a longer explanation than a straight 3RR violation. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 04:36, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
Time for a range block?
Pls see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Oglesruins -- Moxy (talk) 00:49, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
- Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 02:37, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Edits just a moment ago on Jonathan Wilkes
The most recent diffs weren't showing up for me for some reason, so thank you for fixing the problem (I was still seeing the vandalism). I was trying to undo the vandalism. Sorry. Dustin (talk) 22:13, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
- Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 22:18, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
- Okay, thanks again. Dustin (talk) 22:24, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
sepp blatter
I prefer my version. What are your reasons for taking out the fact that both havelnage and blatter are widely discredited for their financial mismanagement? Is it that you don't know that to be the case? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jimbobsky (talk • contribs) 04:39, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
- Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 04:48, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
Can you show me where these rules are?
Are there rules for my User Page? If so can you show me them? — Preceding unsigned comment added by PhD Tomorrow (talk • contribs) 19:20, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
- Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 19:23, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
Could you explain the end of this note?
This page has been deleted. The deletion and move log for the page are provided below for reference.
02:22, 24 May 2014 Gogo Dodo (talk | contribs) deleted page User:Akabluey (Mass deletion of pages added by .wog-wog: Vandalism)
Who is .wog-wog: Vandalism ?
Akabluey (talk) 04:26, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
- Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 04:41, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
Thank you Akabluey (talk) 04:58, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
Your deletion of "Metropolis Rugby Club" Article
Sorry, this is a continuation of my last post...
Being that Metropolis plays at the same National Level as OMBAC...Why would our article be deleted and OMBACs be accepted?
Notability Guidelines state....An organization is generally considered notable if it has been the subject of significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. Trivial or incidental coverage of a subject by secondary sources is not sufficient to establish notability. All content must be verifiable. If no independent, third-party, reliable sources can be found on a topic, then Wikipedia should not have an article on it.
So how was OMBACs sources verified? thank you. Akabluey (talk) 04:52, 11 June 2014 (UTC)