User talk:Tyruler

Regarding Disputes and dialogue involving CAIR: Please do not replace Wikipedia pages with blank content. It is considered vandalism. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. Andjam 10:55, 20 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Tyruler for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familliar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Andjam 15:28, 25 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

CAIR

Hi. I noticed that you (or an impersonator of you) are (or was recently) a member of CAIR. It may be a good idea if you avoid writing about CAIR, as it may be difficult to make NPOV contributions to articles about the organization. Thanks, Andjam 11:48, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field, especially for big edits or when you are making subtle but important changes, like changing dates or numbers. Thank you. Andjam 02:51, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your comment on a user talk page

This is for calling someone Jewish when it is of marginal relevance (I'm not accusing you of being an anti-semite, however), and other comments that are of marginal relevance in the quest for building an encyclopedia.

It seems to me that you have acted in an uncivil manner on User talk:Infinite Justice. It is important to keep a cool head, despite any comments against you. Personal attacks and disruptive comments only escalate a situation; please keep calm and action can be taken against the other parties if necessary. Your involvement in attacking back can only satisfy trolls or anger contributors, and lead to general bad feeling. Please try to remain civil with your comments. Thanks! Andjam 12:42, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I would appreciate it if you don't dig into trashy arguments by digging and fishing through my user history talk page to again silence me.

That's not happening. Its kind to preach civility but user Andjam has consistently blocked my attempts to contribute to an article on CAIR. I wish to merely take the POV to NPOV. I have shown on many occasions of the double standards and POV position on the article including using a pathological CAIR-hater, Daniel Pipes, word for word on the CAIR article.

Thanks for your reminder though Andjam, it illustrates perfectly how deceptive some users who use Wikipedia can be. You have still yet to prove your sockpuppetry case. In the meantime, keep sending more of the same recycled tactics to crush my online contributions to this wonderful site. As in one of your conversation with Wiki administrator you say:

You removed an alert on the grounds it was not recent. Can you please check? Some vandalism (partial page blanking, removal of warnings) was done by the IP today (referring to me of course). The user removed warnings after being given a final warning for vandalism. Does that not count? Andjam 17:21, 25 June 2006 (UTC)

User kimchi replies: No it doesn't. The removal of warnings was after I removed the report from AIV. The report was there for a good 12 minutes. At the worst if he insists on removing warnings his talk page may be protected, but the fact is, he was warned only 3 times for vandalism recently (including blanking his talk page). That is insufficient warning to merit a block. Kimchi.sg 17:32, 25 June 2006 (UTC).

So as was demonstrated above, the intimidating tactics to block me was simply that, an attempt to intimidate. I'm glad we have scores of other Wiki editors who are not agenda driven and bullyish, who adhere to the NPOV policy strictly. To borrow a page from your book, I'll close by thanking you. Thanks!! Tyruler 00:56, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]