User talk:Cullen328/Archive 15

Archive 10

←

Archive 13

Archive 14

Archive 15

Archive 16

Archive 17

→

Archive 20

Hi! I found your name in the teahouse. could I ask for your input on this page tagged for deletion? Novavax, Inc.

Hi Cullen328! I found your name in the teahouse. could I ask for your input on this page tagged for deletion? Novavax, Inc. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Novavax,_Inc. Id very much like a few more opinions on the notability of this page. Thanks!January2009 (talk) 16:45, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

In my opinion, January2009, you need to find significant coverage in reliable, independent sources of this company, and add those sources to the article. That is the standard for notability here on Wikipedia, which all articles must meet. Currently, the sources in the article are very weak and do not establish notability. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 00:19, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

Cullen328, someone deleted my user page. I searched quite a bit but havent found a solution. Do you have a recommendation? January2009 (talk) 00:47, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

It has now been restored. Regards January2009 (talk) 01:02, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

It looks like GB fan took care of it for you, January2009. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 01:18, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

Your comment in Teahouse

Thank you for taking the time to answer.

The text in Daniel Fast makes no medical health claims. It never did. The references are to support the wiki text interpretation of the Biblical passages. The full Old Test passages have been removed, leaving only short quotes of the Bible passages. Considering the timing and tag, I have to assume that edit was mostly retaliation for raising the content propaganda / COI issue.

The Foundation is quite concerned about intentional misrepresentation (including propaganda) of fact, and obviously COI. They are concerned about the dramatic loss of active editors. They have indicated that they are considering making additional changes to policy. I've got my checkbook ready to make it happen.

Maybe much of my experience is simply an example of why doctors, clinicians, and nurses should be required to attend continuing education. The science is changing fast. But, there is absolutely certainly propaganda being practiced by editors. You might look at content before and after I edited in mammography, PSA, induced birth, depression articles, and prostate cancer. It usually starts because I read something and think "that is NOT true". So I feel like it's my responsibility to fix it. BIG changes. Often recently formally vetted or edited by medical professionals, those articles all seriously mislead the public with omission of critical facts. Why hadn't they added new (but not very new) reviews?

I would prefer to work collaboratively. On the other hand recently, I'm told to not edit in MDD until I've fixed Depression, management of depression, and probably the underlying article chronotherapy (or create a new article chronotherapeutics). A few editors think they own articles, and make it happen because they are always here. So I give up, leaving a huge gap in MDD; because a therapy is missing that works as well or better ("first line" states the recent review) than those detailed in MDD. And the intro reads like antidepressants alone work well for the severely depressed! See [[1]][[2]][[3]].

Aren't articles with huge gaps in fact tagged as such? Why hasn't this one? Someone else needs to make those fixes (in a major wiki topic), because I give up. Please place that tag on MDD, or direct me to the wiki page that tells of tags.32cllou (talk) 16:37, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

I think you're the editor who told me long ago "medicine is an art, not a science." Hogwash, regardless who in Teahouse said that, because the practice of medicine is certainly an art, but the quality of that art is founded on hard objective science. For example, induced births are still 25-30% of all births in some major hospital systems, or 5% in those hospital systems following strict protocol. The overall national rate was falling very slowly before our edits, and has fallen much faster since. Think of all the children who won't be born (induced before 39 weeks) with lifelong learning problems. So, now it occurs to me I need to check that the facts are still in Wiki.32cllou (talk) 15:56, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

One more thought. Did you know medical professionals are tested on the science (lots of facts), but never on their ability to provide an efficient accurate diagnosis and treatment. They are never tested on the art.32cllou (talk) 16:02, 6 May 2014 (UTC) Maybe I feel like I owe Wiki for providing me with critical medical information for myself and family, which enabled me to work with medical professionals and improve outcomes.32cllou (talk) 16:31, 6 May 2014 (UTC) PSS much of that critical information in wiki was referenced with primary research, which is being rapidly removed by folks like Jmh.32cllou (talk) 16:36, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

I never said that "art not science" thing, 32cllou. Please discuss your specific concerns on each article's talk pages. "Wiki" is a family of software, while "Wikipedia" is this encyclopedia, and experienced editors are bemused by that contraction. Jmh understands our standards for medical articles much better than I do. Thanks. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 18:30, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

I'll use wiki. in the future. Jmh understands wiki. standards them better than I do also, so why doesn't he put the missing information tag on MDD?. You neglected to help me find the tags page. Here's just one of the the reviews to support my assertion that MDD is missing a critical treatment [[[[4]]32cllou (talk) 18:40, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

32cllou, a few points. I do not know what "MDD" is an abbreviation for, and it would be helpful if you got in the habit of wikilinking to the article in question. Also, I know nothing about an "information missing" tag and have never placed one in my five years of editing. You are as capable of looking it up as I am. I almost never edit medical articles unless I see obvious vandalism. I have no medical training or confidence in the field, though I have a general understanding of the challenges the encyclopedia faces in maintaining such articles. In conclusion, I am not about to start editing medical articles now, so please don't ask me to get involved. I stick to areas I'm comfortable with. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 19:30, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Jodie Foster

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Jodie Foster. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:00, 7 May 2014 (UTC)

GA recuitment

Hi Cullen, I saw your note about the Centre on Brandon's mentorship page. Actually, I was intending to write User:Dom497 a note on his talk page and/or send him an email and see what I can do to help out during his wikibreak. Instead, I'll ask you, since I'm not sure it'd get to him, anyway. I'm on board with the Centre and its goals; although I've had mixed results in the folks I've mentored for GACs, I've had some really positive and worthwhile experiences. I think it's a worthwhile project, so if there's anything I can I do I'm willing to go for it, even if it's taking over management of the project while Dom's on wikibreak. Let me know, and what I should do towards that end. Thanks. Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 20:34, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

Hello Christine. You know, I used to be an Ambassador for the Wikipedia in Higher Education program and found that only a very small percentage of students went on to be productive editors. So I hear you. But I encourage you to stick with the training, and I will promise to furnish candidate articles and helpful feedback (I hope) if that would be useful. Do not hesitate to ask. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 21:41, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

I have replied here.--Dom497 (talk) 00:42, 7 May 2014 (UTC)

My post in teahouse

Hello, Cullen. Where do you find articles for deletion and templates for accepted and not accepted in AfC. Sincerely--Winston Birdwell (talk) 22:40, 7 May 2014 (UTC)

Hello, Winston Birdwell. The main page for Articles for Deletion is at WP:AFD and today's active deletion debates are located at WP:AFDT. At the top of the page, you can navigate to debates starting in previous days. I am not active in Articles for Creation, so am not familiar with the templates. I know that Anne Delong knows that project well. Perhaps she can help you. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 23:48, 7 May 2014 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to the Teahouse, Winston Birdwell. The list of articles that are waiting for review at "Articles for creation" is HERE. The templates are used by the AfC reviewers, who are all experienced Wikipedians. Is there something in particular that you wanted to do? —Anne Delong (talk) 00:49, 8 May 2014 (UTC)

Request to check draft

Hi Jim,

If you had a bit of time, I would like to seek your advice and expertise as to whether you think this page could be included in Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:CogencyGX/Jess_C_Scott

I am in no rush to post the page. I just wanted your opinion as to how the page is right now, to know how much more I would have to add to it if the current references are not strong enough (I will submit for review when the references are indeed enough).

Thank you in advance!CogencyGX (talk) 18:56, 8 May 2014 (UTC)

Picture question

Hello, Cullen! Thank you for answering my Teahouse question today. I found this image [5] that has a creative commons license on it. In the image description, however, it says "Photo courtesy of Terracycle." Do you feel this image is safe to use, or that the Flickr uploader might have accidentally put a CC license on it even though he/she technically is not allowed? Thanks! Bananasoldier (talk) 04:40, 9 May 2014 (UTC)

The same for this [6]. Thanks! Bananasoldier (talk) 04:42, 9 May 2014 (UTC)

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 04:17, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

Jews and Communism re-nominated for deletion

Hey Cullen! While I'm here, I'd like to thank you for helping me get started on Wikipedia back in February.. you're a great help to new users!

Anyways, Since you contributed to or were otherwise involved in the original afD nomination, you may or may not wish to comment on the new afD nomination, found here: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jews and Communism (2nd nomination) I intend on leaving this note to everyone who edited the first AFD and has not yet contributed to the new discussion. Thanks! :) Flipandflopped (Discuss, Contribs) 16:19, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for the neutral notification, Flipandflopped. I will take a look later. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 16:23, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

A lot more than I thought!

Hi Cullen328! Thank you for answering my question today at the Teahouse. Even after my first two articles I still feel like the new kid on campus (or at Hogwarts with things zinging at you unexpectedly). There is so much more going on "behind the scenes" than I could ever imagine! I have stated on another talk page that switching from Swedish to English Wiki is like transferring from "Dad's Army" to the "U.S. Marines", and I stand by it. Thanks for helping us newbies. - W.carter (talk) 15:16, 12 May 2014 (UTC)

NYIT

Could you please add Harry Hurwitz and Morrie Yohai under "Notable faculty, staff and board members" section on NYIT. Thanks--77788er (talk) 15:48, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

Hello 77788er. Is there a reason why you can't add them yourself? Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 17:55, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Right Sector

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Right Sector. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:00, 14 May 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

		The Guidance Barnstar
		For your ever so useful work at The Teahouse. I salute you. Have a nice day, Jim! Eman235/talk 03:41, 17 May 2014 (UTC)

Thank you very much, Eman235. You are kind. I enjoy helping out at the Teahouse. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 03:44, 17 May 2014 (UTC)

Hinduism and Judaism

I just saw your remark, and all I can say is "no way". I'm not getting into these comparative religion articles--I don't have the skills or the patience. Enjoy your weekend, Cullen! Drmies (talk) 15:43, 17 May 2014 (UTC)

It was a joke, good sir, and please feel free to not edit any article you don't want to. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 17:15, 17 May 2014 (UTC)

Bible Reference: KJV?

Cullen328, on your earlier comments on how a biblical reference should use a common, accepted version, do you think that the King James Version would do? After all, it is possibly the most famous, respected English translation of the Bible in existence. Just confirming with you as you seem to be fairly knowledgeable in these matters with Wikipedia :). --Joseph Yanchar (talk) 19:33, 18 May 2014 (UTC)

Hello, Joseph Yanchar. I am not fully conversant with the range of available Bible translations, so please don't take my comments as definitive. Though the KJV is a great literary work, it is over 400 years old and was written even then in slightly archaic "high" language. As a Jew, I am well aware of major errors in translation of Hebrew verses. I certainly would not use it in any article related to a Jewish or Roman Catholic topic. I think I would be inclined to recommend a contemporary translation such as the New Revised Standard Version "Common Bible" which includes the complete canons of Catholic, Protestant and Orthodox traditions, including of course the complete Tanakh, as Jews call Hebrew scriptures. Please also be aware that the Bible is not in any way favored over the Talmud, the Koran, the Book of Mormon, or the vast body of holy writings of Hinduism, Buddhism, Sikhism, Confucianism, Bahai, and so on. All are primary sources, and scholarly contemporary sources are always preferred. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 19:51, 18 May 2014 (UTC)

Okay. The New Revised Standard Version would make sense, it's pretty much the official Christian, non-Catholic translation along with the New King James Version. Thank you, --Joseph Yanchar (talk) 19:55, 18 May 2014 (UTC)

The expanded "Common Bible" edition includes all the books of the Roman Catholic canon. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 20:23, 18 May 2014 (UTC)

Native American cuisine

Hi Cullen. Would you mind having a look at this article? I may just be tired, but when I tried reading it my head almost exploded. It seems to need an awful lot of cleanup. I would be happy to help and to work on some of the redlink dishes as well. I was checking it out to compare it with the way we are (or are not as the case may be) covering Native Hawaiian cuisine. But while that dispute continues I would love to see some progress made on improving this other subject area and you mentioned that you have some interest in the subject more generally? Anyway, if you're not interested or you think I'm being pointy or whatever I apologize. Truly I just think the article needs work and I made a couple of changes but I'm a little gunshy at the mo and would be glad for any and all assistance (as long as you don't remove any photos! I LOVE photos). Thanks. Have a good one. Candleabracadabra (talk) 04:02, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for reaching out, Candleabracadabra. I think I looked at that article a few years back but don't remember just how bad (or good) it was. My wife is a cookbook collector and we have discussed this topic many times. We already own about half a dozen books on the topic of Native American cuisine of varying quality though our books about Hawaiian cuisine are now sparse. Something about not wanting to carry too many books on the plane and having spent all our spare cash before our bookstore visit at the end of our trip to Hawaii last year. So, I don't have the energy to delve deeply now as I am tired. I will just say, though, that I am fascinated at the dramatic contribution that the foods indigenous to the Americas and unknown elsewhere in 1492 have made to world cuisine. Potatoes, maize, tomatoes, chili peppers, most beans, turkey, and on and on. If I list any more off the top of my head, I will surely make a mistake. But it is profound. So thanks for asking. Let's not fight, let's improve the encyclopedia instead. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 04:25, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

I found a discussion from 2012 in archive 2 of the Cuisine of Hawaii talk page where there was a consensus to split the article. Ancient Hawaiian cuisine (I think) was one of the two possible names. That would narrow the scope according to your desires. Candleabracadabra (talk) 19:29, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Barnstar of Good Humor
	HAHAHAHA PercyJackson.12 (talk) 21:12, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

Move review notification

Because you participated in the most recent discussion regarding the proposed move of Hillary Rodham Clinton, you are hereby notified per Wikipedia:Canvassing#Appropriate notification that the administrative determination of consensus from that discussion is being challenged at Wikipedia:Move review/Log/2014 May. Please feel free to comment there. Cheers! bd2412 T 19:20, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

Thanks. I commented there. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 19:59, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

Bai Fan

hi Jim, I'm new here and is trying to create an article for an actor. His name is Bai Fan but there is already existing title "Bai Fan", "BaiFan" and "Bai_Fan" who is a different person. Need your advice on how should I name the new article. Thank you.Ifan4ever (talk) 09:11, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

Hello, Ifan4ever. The quick answer is to name it Bai Fan (actor), and to add hat notes to the top of each of the articles referring to the other. If you believe that the actor is clearly better known than the other person, additional steps will be needed once your article is in main space. Let me know. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 15:29, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

An SPI

You are mentioned and may have an interest in Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/ChildofMidnight. Thank you, Drmies (talk) 20:30, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

Drmies, I found that presentation persuasive, though I don't claim to be a skilled sock hunter. I made a brief comment there. Thank you for the heads up. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 03:49, 22 May 2014 (UTC)

Thank you Cullen. Drmies (talk) 04:00, 22 May 2014 (UTC)

In relation to recent BLP/N thread in which you made a comment

If you have the time, please comment on [7] and [8]--Ubikwit ^連絡 _{見学/迷惑} 12:51, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:List of Palestinians

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:List of Palestinians. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 01:12, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

Proper attribution for a photo on Wikipedia

Thank you for responding to my question. How should I attribute this photo?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Ektara_player.jpg

Thanks.

Wikiwonderwhy101 (talk) 22:23, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

Hello Wikiwonderwhy101. Any usage should credit the photographer, Md. Saiful Aziz Shamseer. A specific answer would require an accurate description of how you plan to use the photo. If on Wikipedia or another Wikimedia project, simply use the file, which contains the attribution. If used on another website, link to the Wikimedia page. In printed form credit the photographer and include a URL to the Wikimedia page. If you manufacture T-shirts or coffee mugs, credit the photographer and add the URL. Just do your personal ethical best. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 03:44, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

Thanks, I appreciate your answer, which is a lot clearer than what I have seen on Wikipedia. However, I have gotten frustrated with the process of trying to take care of a simple attribution, and selected another photograph in the meantime. I suspect a lot of people do that, since Wikipedia may try to be user-friendly, but does not succeed in many cases, such as this.Wikiwonderwhy101 (talk) 12:25, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Tireless Contributor Barnstar

For your tireless efforts in recent months to give full, engaging, and accurate answers to large numbers of newcomers' questions in a variety of places, including in particular the TeaHouse and of course your own talk page today (by my clock anyway). I would emulate your sterling work, but I just don't have that much time. I am very sure that a great many editors appreciate your help, and the encyclopedia benefits from it. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 19:53, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

You are very kind, Demiurge1000. Thank you. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 22:55, 28 May 2014 (UTC)