User talk:MJJFFF

Welcome!

Hi, MJJFFF. Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Our intro page contains a lot of helpful material for new users—please check it out! If you need help, visit Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. —MelbourneStar☆^talk 04:48, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Angus Taylor (politician), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. —MelbourneStar☆^talk 04:48, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Angus Taylor (politician) with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. ♥ Solarra ♥ ^{♪ 話 ♪} ߷ _{♀ 投稿 ♀} 04:54, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I am going to have to respectfully ask that you not continue to remove information from Angus Taylor (politician), particularly when your edits are at odds with the consensus for inclusion. Your disruptive edits and attempts at censorship have been repeatedly reverted by numerous editors. This may be teetering on the edge of vandalism and an edit war. Neither of these are desirable outcomes. Again, please discuss your proposed removal on the article's talk page to form consensus with other editors to improve this article. Administrative intervention is the last thing anyone wants. Regards, --dsprc ^[talk] 01:13, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

MJJFFF, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi MJJFFF! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Osarius (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:09, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Angus Taylor (politician). Your edits have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. --dsprc ^[talk] 09:12, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Angus Taylor (politician) with this edit, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Bentogoa (talk) 07:00, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Angus Taylor

Hi MJJFFF. I gather that you have issues with the content of the Angus Taylor article, possibly because you are connected with the subject. Fixing problems is important, but the manner in which you have been trying to do so isn't going to work. This situation, where the content is removed and added back again, can only lead to this account being blocked. Instead, I strongly encourage you to engage in discussion on the talk page of the article. If you can get agreement there, the changes will stick. - Bilby (talk) 07:06, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48hrs for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule, as you did at Angus Taylor (politician). Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Bilby (talk) 03:04, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi MJJFFF, as sugested by @Bilby: please head to the talk page where editors are trying to improve the article, rather than continuing your habit of disruptive edits - even after suspension. 1955Dewayne (talk) 07:27, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

July 2014

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Angus Taylor (politician). Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Dwpaul ^Talk 01:30, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]