|
Welcome to my talk page!
Please place new messages at the bottom of this page, or click here to start a new discussion, which will automatically be at the bottom. I will respond to comments here, unless there's a better place for them. Please read the following helpful hints, as well as our talk page guidelines before posting:
|
|
- Think. Use common sense. Failure to do so may see your posts ignored.
- Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. That means it is not a social networking site, a place for self-promotion, a marketing tool or a free web host.
- The possibility that the blog/MySpace page/Youtube Video/sign on a telephone pole you read is a reliable source is roughly equal to the chance that I will be the next Pope. I'm a lesbian. You do the math.
- If I nominated your page for deletion, read the CSD I nominated it under, one passing mention in a trade magazine does not make your company/band/mummified cat juggling act worthy of a Wikipedia article.
It's important to realize the propaganda coup the disastrous spying policies of the NSA have handed to authoritarian governments worldwide. They can push through laws clearly designed to tighten control over their citizens, on the premise of protecting them from the NSA, and the public in Russia is likely to have some sympathy. After all, the Brazilians (who appear to have little authoritarian aims at all) are heading down the same path. It's a disaster for an open and free and neutral Internet, an Internet of the world. ~ Jimbo Wales
Start a new talk topic
|
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:56, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
|
Hi
I have had issues with my first attempt at composing a page.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RMMV_Survivor_R
I have tried to resolve the problems without success, could you please assist?
Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wolpat (talk • contribs) 00:44, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Working on it, give me a bit. ♥ Solarra ♥ ♪ 話 ♪ ߷ ♀ 投稿 ♀ 01:34, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- I did the first section for you to show you how to reference, word it, and how the WP:Manual of Style generally runs for articles. Let me know if you have any further questions. An excellent start! ♥ Solarra ♥ ♪ 話 ♪ ߷ ♀ 投稿 ♀ 01:56, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Solarra
Thanks for your help with RMMV Survivor R article.
Can you please advise as to how I can remove the "multiple issues" message that I have at the top of the page?
Thanks again for your time in sorting this.
Kind regards
Wolpat — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wolpat (talk • contribs) 15:05, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Start by cleaning up the references, see how I referenced the section I edited? Let me know when you get that part done. ♥ Solarra ♥ ♪ 話 ♪ ߷ ♀ 投稿 ♀ 15:09, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, would you kindly comment on a thread I've left on the talk page? Thanks! -- — Keithbob • Talk • 15:05, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Done ♥ Solarra ♥ ♪ 話 ♪ ߷ ♀ 投稿 ♀ 17:33, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
... who set up the socks NSH003 and NSH004, and who made some few hundred attacks on various editors this morning (using numerous other socks, as well as these two), while not many admins were active (North Americans all in bed, only a few European early risers around).
See my request at User talk:Avraham (Avi). Avi is a very experienced admin and bureaucrat, and I think it best to allow him to deal with it. Until that happens, I think it best to leave my simple message there, so that people can see I am not responsible for the sock's vandalism. --NSH001 (talk) 17:22, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Fine by me, I was just going after the userpages per WP:DENY ♥ Solarra ♥ ♪ 話 ♪ ߷ ♀ 投稿 ♀ 17:32, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Regarding this edit [1] of yours. Do you have any idea who the Hazara people are or are you just bullying me around? They DO NOT live all over Pakistan, that's an absurd claim and is UNSOURCED nonsense likely added by a Hazara editor. They are Shias and only live in the city of Quetta. That's the only safe place for them in Pakistan, and even there they are often massacred. Please learn about a subject before aggressively reverting good faith edits.--39.47.29.108 (talk) 20:59, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- First of all, I recommend reading WP:CIVIL, me reverting you had nothing to do with endorsing of material on the article versus what was submitted. I have restored what you added and put in a note for the need of citations needed. :-) ♥ Solarra ♥ ♪ 話 ♪ ߷ ♀ 投稿 ♀ 21:59, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Please explain how I can properly add the link to www.BatToExeConverter.com to the batch file page. My compiler is my lives work. It started a software category in 2003 and it adds many useful commands to batch files that cannot be found elseware.
It also allows users to hide their batch file code and add an icon. They can raise code to ADMIN level execution status and embed their company name and copyright/version information in the file properties.
I was also trying to remove the part of the article that contains malicious batch file code in order to prevent ignoarant people sharing malicious code to hard working people. This can cost time and money to thousands of people if it is not removed. Someone could potentionally lose their job or even worst. Why was I blocked from making these changes.
I am new to editing wiki articles but I feel my changes are necessary. Please help me make these changes.
Always here to help. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Onlywanttohelpeveryone4 (talk • contribs) 21:51, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- That link violates Wikipedia's policy on external links. ♥ Solarra ♥ ♪ 話 ♪ ߷ ♀ 投稿 ♀ 22:06, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Kenji Miyazawa. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Done ♥ Solarra ♥ ♪ 話 ♪ ߷ ♀ 投稿 ♀ 00:47, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Solara, the removal of all the contents from User:Emmanuel Adewole is due to the page being an old duplicate of the webpage (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emmanuel_Adewole). If you could go ahead and remove the contents on the web page again or possibly delete the user:Emmanuel Adewole account that would be helpful.
Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wonder6490 (talk • contribs) 11:54, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Done Tagged the page for CSD. In the future I recommend using an edit summary :-) ♥ Solarra ♥ ♪ 話 ♪ ߷ ♀ 投稿 ♀ 12:04, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
| The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.
|
|
My edit may not have had the proper citation, but it is NOT vandalism. If you doubt the truth of the story, check the news. IF you accuse me of "vandalism" one more time, YOU will be reported. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.158.147.133 (talk) 16:57, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- This edit is an unsourced negative contribution to a living person and as such it was reverted. If you source the edit feel free to re-add it. I would also recommend reading WP:CIVIL. ♥ Solarra ♥ ♪ 話 ♪ ߷ ♀ 投稿 ♀ 17:00, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Civil? YOU were the one who accused ME of "vandalism". The story has been reported by just about every reputable news agency. My edit may not have proper citation, but it was NOT vandalism. You are the one who leveled a false accusation and claimed the edit was "non-constructive". (Personal attack removed) If you accuse me of vandalism one more time, you will be reported. Have a nice day! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.158.147.133 (talk) 17:05, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
What exactly is wrong with you? Jose Vargas being detained may be "negative", but it is is a legitimate story. It would have taken you 5 seconds to confirm. Instead of threatening, how about INSTRUCTING me on the proper way to use citations on Wikipedia? I'm sorry, that would make too much sense. (Personal attack removed) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.158.147.133 (talk) 17:33, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- In the three messages you have been left regarding that edit, instructions are included on how to source content. Per the living persons biographies policy, all unsourced negative contributions can be reverted. Continuance to violate that policy will almost certainly result in a block. ♥ Solarra ♥ ♪ 話 ♪ ߷ ♀ 投稿 ♀ 17:38, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
You left me no instructions on how to cite sources. If you were truly on Wikipedia to help other users, you would offer help instead of leveling false accusations. By claiming to have left instructions on how to cite sources, you have also lied. (Personal attack removed) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.158.147.133 (talk) 17:43, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Removed various personal attacks from above ♥ Solarra ♥ ♪ 話 ♪ ߷ ♀ 投稿 ♀ 17:52, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- This link, left on your talk page twice, instructs on how to source content, what is a reliable source, and what is not a reliable source. ♥ Solarra ♥ ♪ 話 ♪ ߷ ♀ 投稿 ♀ 17:52, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The link you gave was irrelevant. It was about proper sources and reliability, not how to properly CITE sources. Thanks for your attempt to help, but I think I'll try someone who knows a little more about Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.158.147.133 (talk) 17:59, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
OMG! The article on Jose Antonio Vargas has been "vandalized" by someone editing in the FACT that he's been detained by immigration officials. Hurry! Stop this vandalism now! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.158.147.133 (talk) 20:20, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
|
Hi, I let you know about this last month (User talk:Solarra/Archive 5#dash fixing 2), though it archived without comment. Today, a script you applied to Barack Obama via this edit broke an image link, fixed by another user here. Is there something that can be done to this script so that it either skips altering dashes in File: links, or alerts the editor that an image needs to be renamed? Tarc (talk) 23:08, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- I reported the bug to the user who wrote the script. I have been manually checking to see if it has been breaking images and/or reference links, thanks for catching the booboo, appreciated :-) ♥ Solarra ♥ ♪ 話 ♪ ߷ ♀ 投稿 ♀ 23:19, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Sounds good, keep up the good work. :) Tarc (talk) 12:15, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Just letting you know—when you reverted an IP's recent edit to Cedar Point, you marked it as unexplained speedy deletion template removal, even though it didn't remove any speedy tag (the page didn't even have a speedy tag). I commented out the warning on their talk page. If you actually did mean to do this, feel free to revert me. Thanks! —LucasThoms 23:45, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- I think this was one of those where the wrong edit was reverted, while I do my best to take care before hitting that revert button, sometimes a bug or two happens :/ Thanks for catching it, I welcomed the user. ♥ Solarra ♥ ♪ 話 ♪ ߷ ♀ 投稿 ♀ 02:45, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Solarra. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Draft:Jumpstreet Tours, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not unambiguously promotional. Thank you. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 07:05, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- This was much more promotional when I tagged it, but I'm glad the author took the warning to heart and cleaned it up :-) ♥ Solarra ♥ ♪ 話 ♪ ߷ ♀ 投稿 ♀ 10:30, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The Controversies you have added are totally unfounded,
All these have accusations have been discarded by Greek courts and should not be used at any reason — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikidmedit (talk • contribs) 10:00, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- This edit gave me no reason why you removed the content, which is why the edit was reverted. However, I'll discuss it with you. The content is sourced from Reuters, Vice Magazine, and other strong secondary sources, can you point to somewhere that verifies what you claim? ♥ Solarra ♥ ♪ 話 ♪ ߷ ♀ 投稿 ♀ 10:36, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Dear Solarra,Can you or an admin add an edit line on the page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arvind_Iyer “ he currently resides in new York,N.Y and Residence New York
thanks (Suntug11 (talk) 12:09, 16 July 2014 (UTC))[reply]
Dear Solarra,I got it from here http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1069392/resume?ref_=nm_ov_res (Suntug11 (talk) 13:03, 16 July 2014 (UTC))[reply]
- Can you source this information? Information about living persons needs to be sourced (newspaper, magazine, etc) ♥ Solarra ♥ ♪ 話 ♪ ߷ ♀ 投稿 ♀ 12:27, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Understand.Thank You for the insight.(Suntug11 (talk) 11:40, 16 July 2014 (UTC))[reply]
Angel Solarra,
Is there any way to completely delete older versions from my Wiki History?
like this one..https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Arvind_Iyer&oldid=544630057
full of wrong information.The only one that needs to stay is the one that is currently live on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arvind_Iyer
The rest do not contribute to anything except database dumps on sites that never update and mass confusion with identity.If possible,kindly help me.only an Admin or Moderator can make these deletions i assume.
thanks (Suntug11 (talk) 11:27, 16 July 2014 (UTC))[reply]
- Administrators can delete revisions from article history (see this page's history for examples) but this is only done for egregious violations of WP:BLP, blatent personal attacks, etc. We keep article histories around because it shows where the article has been and who has contributed to the article, which is required under the CC-BY-SA license contributions are licensed under. If there is examples of information that does need to be deleted, see WP:REVDEL. ♥ Solarra ♥ ♪ 話 ♪ ߷ ♀ 投稿 ♀ 11:34, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Solarra, I was just wondering what you think needs to be better sourced for this article? Is there anything in particular? Are the current sources not good enough? Thanks a lot.
170.20.11.6 (talk) 14:38, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- I added where I believe citations should be to remove the tag, the goal is to try and cite as much as possible. Also you should try to not cite with bare URLs, see WP:CITE. ♥ Solarra ♥ ♪ 話 ♪ ߷ ♀ 投稿 ♀ 20:40, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Concerning the contribution
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Annika_Ström
Hi Solarra
Thanks for your input about the references. I think I have done it right now.
Best
Meet the family — Preceding unsigned comment added by Meet the family (talk • contribs) 14:19, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
You were recently recently offered a statement in a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Media Viewer RfC. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Media Viewer RfC/Evidence. Please add your evidence by July 26, 2014, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Media Viewer RfC/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. Before adding evidence please review the scope of the case. For the Arbitration Committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:10, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- This requires no action from me, my statement is already on record. ♥ Solarra ♥ ♪ 話 ♪ ߷ ♀ 投稿 ♀ 04:13, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Reason i have added color pencil in crayons because
1) lead of color pencil have same pigment as in crayons
2) Most of countries Germany , and Europe you will Crayons written on color pencil box
3) both are use for drawing by students
4) crayons definition in oxford dictionary also says color pencil — Preceding unsigned comment added by 120.56.211.120 (talk) 06:32, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Can you link me to where it lists colored pencils as crayons in the oxford dictionary. From what I understand and what the sources give, colored pencils have no wax in them. ♥ Solarra ♥ ♪ 話 ♪ ߷ ♀ 投稿 ♀ 06:35, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Solara,
I see so many external links for the same page, as given by me. Why? this partial moment by me. As I have given links for user information. There are three links on top which have done same job as I am doing. Why are other links not removed? Is it that you promote few and do not promote others? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gururaj11 (talk • contribs) 06:55, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- The other links listed are used to reference the article. This link is unambiguously advertising and an attempt to promote a product. Please read WP:NOTADVERTISING. ♥ Solarra ♥ ♪ 話 ♪ ߷ ♀ 投稿 ♀ 06:59, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Disagree on other links being reference to articles it is straight forward service page links This link This link This link is unambiguously advertising and an attempt to promote a product . You need to be more careful on what you mark for others. You are either paid or being used to simply penalize us for your probability in Wikipedia awards. You please do proper editorial and being partial to other users like us will lose interest on wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gururaj11 (talk • contribs) 08:06, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- I proposed deletion of the page. You are both right and wrong, those links are promotional (as is the entire article quite frankly), but so is the link you posted. The difference is that those links directly support content in the article. ♥ Solarra ♥ ♪ 話 ♪ ߷ ♀ 投稿 ♀ 08:30, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Dear Solara,
I just tried to add a link for Printed Circuit board Wikipedia page, and you have marked it as a spam.
Do please let me know weather http://www.ipc.org/default.aspx, http://www.ipcoutlook.org/, http://www.smtonline.com/pages/smtmagazine.cgi this link which is present on page not a spam ? Are those links are not vehicle for advertising or promotion. ?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chetansynergos (talk • contribs) 07:37, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- The links that are already there offer a trade magazine that offers issues free of charge. This link is to a company website offering to sell a product. That is the difference. ♥ Solarra ♥ ♪ 話 ♪ ߷ ♀ 投稿 ♀ 07:43, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I totally disagree on you. You mean to say that i am promoting information for paid ? Dear Solara, pleas be realistic before doing any changes as the Wikipedia. From any point of view this site don't look like a magazine http://www.ipcoutlook.org/ and that to its a straight home page of a website who provide other services also. You need to be more careful on what you mark for others. The link posted by me does not promote any thing promotional except the information of Importance of PCB.
You please do proper editorial or else I will lose interest on wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chetansynergos (talk • contribs) 08:27, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- I did not accuse you of promotion for them, I said the link added was promotional. I agree, the IPC website is promotional, which is why I removed it (a vandal had distracted me from doing so right away). Please read WP:EL ♥ Solarra ♥ ♪ 話 ♪ ߷ ♀ 投稿 ♀ 08:36, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Dear Solara, I appreciate the necessary changes made by you to maintain the quality of Wikipedia. Also I would be more appreciated if you rollback my link, as i am mot expecting any sort of promotion from Wikipedia nor I am expecting any links from Wikipedia, its a pure form of informative content which will be useful for visitors.
- Hear hear. By the way, I've reapplied page protection on this page to dissuade your pet bigot - let me know, obviously, if you'd like it lifted. Yunshui 雲水 08:06, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Thank you both, @Yunshui: if you wouldn't mind taking care of the WP:RPP I filed, I wasn't sure if you were still watching my talk page. ♥ Solarra ♥ ♪ 話 ♪ ߷ ♀ 投稿 ♀ 08:09, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Done and dusted. Hadn't realised you'd filed one - I have your talkpage on my watchlist, and spotted the revdels when I logged on this morning; figured I might as well pitch in since I'd protected your pages before. Chin up; getting a pet sockvandal is a badge of honour here! Yunshui 雲水 08:13, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- It's been ongoing for a bit now, makes me laugh. Having to log in to IRC to request the revdels, that is the only pain :-P ♥ Solarra ♥ ♪ 話 ♪ ߷ ♀ 投稿 ♀ 08:15, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Somewhere
